Higher normal risk, Auditing

Higher  normal risk

Several audit assignments involve high audit risk and usually in any client there will always be at least one high risk area.  Indications that an audit has an element of higher than normal audit risk include:

(1) Poor management with lack of control and poor book-keeping;

(2) Liquidity problems and high gearing;

(3) The opposite of all the factors mentioned in the normal risk above;

(4) Recent changes in ownership, control or key staff;

(5) Changes in accounting policies or procedures;

(6) Future plans to seek quotation on the Nairobi Stock Exchange;

(7) Over-reliance on a few products, customers, suppliers and investments in new ventures or products;

(8) Problems inherent in the nature of the business for example difficulties in stock counting or valuation, difficulties in determining the extent of claims and provisions and cut-off problems;

(9) The existence of put upon enquiry situations, dominance by the single person and lack of involvement of directors or proprietors.  In such a situation, the auditor approaches his audit in a manner that is:

    •    Sceptical, relying on high calibre staff
    •    Collection of audit evidence in each area from a wide range of sources
    •    Taking extreme care in the preparation of audit working papers
    •    Investigating thoroughly high risk and problematic areas
    •    Exercising extreme care in drafting the audit report

In addition to normal risk and higher than normal risk discussed above, the auditor can also be exposed by sub-standard work such as:

i. His failure to recognise put upon enquiry situation
ii. His failure to draw correct inferences from audit evidence and the analytical review
iii. His use of wrong procedures in a particular situation
iv. His failure to perform necessary audit work because of time and cost consideration
v. His failure to detect errors or fraud because of poor sampling methods or the selection of inadequate sample sizes

It is essential that an audit firm should organize itself in such a way that it can minimise the risk of suffering any damage.  We can look at these measures from two points of view.  Broad measures taken by the profession as a whole and measures to be taken by the individual auditor in minimising this audit risk.

Posted Date: 12/3/2012 5:53:00 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Higher normal risk, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Higher normal risk, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Higher normal risk Discussions

Write discussion on Higher normal risk
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions

Prepayments - Audit Process Prepayments similar to accruals are not mostly checked through the double entry system. This creates them susceptible to mistake. The auditor's pro

Plant and Machinery - Valuation and Authorization Valuation Valuation is at depreciated historic costs.  Auditor's duty is to make sure that the accounting policy for dep

Reserves - Audit Process Movements in reserves need disclosure in the balance sheet, the loss and profit account, the director's reports or in the notices to the accounts. The

why are the figures presented to an auditor not sufficient for absolute reliance

Presentation and Disclosure - Audit of Accounting Estimates An enterprise should involve the following information relating to a discontinuing operation in its financial state

oversee commission staff to ensure individuals are properly trained and monitored probable risks, controls and audit tests

Advantages and Disadvantages of Joint Audits The general disadvantages and advantages of joint audits as: Advantages 1. All fees and work are welcome to audit firms. 2. A

Advantages and Disadvantages of a Continuous Audit Advantages: The regular or continual attendance of the auditor might act as a deterrent to scam; Weaknesses in the

Forms of evidence a) Observation: is usually witnessing internal control and book-keeping procedures. It includes attendance at wages pay out. Observation of stock-take, open