Higher normal risk, Auditing

Higher  normal risk

Several audit assignments involve high audit risk and usually in any client there will always be at least one high risk area.  Indications that an audit has an element of higher than normal audit risk include:

(1) Poor management with lack of control and poor book-keeping;

(2) Liquidity problems and high gearing;

(3) The opposite of all the factors mentioned in the normal risk above;

(4) Recent changes in ownership, control or key staff;

(5) Changes in accounting policies or procedures;

(6) Future plans to seek quotation on the Nairobi Stock Exchange;

(7) Over-reliance on a few products, customers, suppliers and investments in new ventures or products;

(8) Problems inherent in the nature of the business for example difficulties in stock counting or valuation, difficulties in determining the extent of claims and provisions and cut-off problems;

(9) The existence of put upon enquiry situations, dominance by the single person and lack of involvement of directors or proprietors.  In such a situation, the auditor approaches his audit in a manner that is:

    •    Sceptical, relying on high calibre staff
    •    Collection of audit evidence in each area from a wide range of sources
    •    Taking extreme care in the preparation of audit working papers
    •    Investigating thoroughly high risk and problematic areas
    •    Exercising extreme care in drafting the audit report

In addition to normal risk and higher than normal risk discussed above, the auditor can also be exposed by sub-standard work such as:

i. His failure to recognise put upon enquiry situation
ii. His failure to draw correct inferences from audit evidence and the analytical review
iii. His use of wrong procedures in a particular situation
iv. His failure to perform necessary audit work because of time and cost consideration
v. His failure to detect errors or fraud because of poor sampling methods or the selection of inadequate sample sizes

It is essential that an audit firm should organize itself in such a way that it can minimise the risk of suffering any damage.  We can look at these measures from two points of view.  Broad measures taken by the profession as a whole and measures to be taken by the individual auditor in minimising this audit risk.

Posted Date: 12/3/2012 5:53:00 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Higher normal risk, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Higher normal risk, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Higher normal risk Discussions

Write discussion on Higher normal risk
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Insurance Companies Authoritative documents involved as: The Insurance Act The Companies Act IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts The major legislation governing insu



The assignment continues the research process by further exploring and defining the problem statement through the development of research objectives. These objectives will allow yo

Advantage and Disadvantage of Judgmental Sampling The advantages of judgment sampling The approach is understood as well and has been refined through experience o

Q. Which of the following represents the largest number of common shares? a. Treasury shares b. Issued shares c. Authorized shares d. Outstanding shares

WHAT ARE THE MAIN PURPOSE OF HAVING PUBLIC SECTOR AUDITING

Question : (a) Describe the following terms: 1) Forensic Accounting; 2) Forensic Investigation; 3) Forensic Auditing. (b) Explain the basic elements to consider for

Ownership and Existence - Verification Procedures Establishment of title and beneficial ownership of investments is not convincingly possible. Conversely, evidence is obtainab

Irregularities: Irregularities can be explained as intentional distortions of financial statements for whatever reason and also as misappropriation of possessions whether or no