Higher normal risk, Auditing

Higher  normal risk

Several audit assignments involve high audit risk and usually in any client there will always be at least one high risk area.  Indications that an audit has an element of higher than normal audit risk include:

(1) Poor management with lack of control and poor book-keeping;

(2) Liquidity problems and high gearing;

(3) The opposite of all the factors mentioned in the normal risk above;

(4) Recent changes in ownership, control or key staff;

(5) Changes in accounting policies or procedures;

(6) Future plans to seek quotation on the Nairobi Stock Exchange;

(7) Over-reliance on a few products, customers, suppliers and investments in new ventures or products;

(8) Problems inherent in the nature of the business for example difficulties in stock counting or valuation, difficulties in determining the extent of claims and provisions and cut-off problems;

(9) The existence of put upon enquiry situations, dominance by the single person and lack of involvement of directors or proprietors.  In such a situation, the auditor approaches his audit in a manner that is:

    •    Sceptical, relying on high calibre staff
    •    Collection of audit evidence in each area from a wide range of sources
    •    Taking extreme care in the preparation of audit working papers
    •    Investigating thoroughly high risk and problematic areas
    •    Exercising extreme care in drafting the audit report

In addition to normal risk and higher than normal risk discussed above, the auditor can also be exposed by sub-standard work such as:

i. His failure to recognise put upon enquiry situation
ii. His failure to draw correct inferences from audit evidence and the analytical review
iii. His use of wrong procedures in a particular situation
iv. His failure to perform necessary audit work because of time and cost consideration
v. His failure to detect errors or fraud because of poor sampling methods or the selection of inadequate sample sizes

It is essential that an audit firm should organize itself in such a way that it can minimise the risk of suffering any damage.  We can look at these measures from two points of view.  Broad measures taken by the profession as a whole and measures to be taken by the individual auditor in minimising this audit risk.

Posted Date: 12/3/2012 5:53:00 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Higher normal risk, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Higher normal risk, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Higher normal risk Discussions

Write discussion on Higher normal risk
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Assessment tasks: This assignment requires you to revisit the case of the collapse of US energy giant Enron Ltd. Your revisit starts with a reading of the excerpts from memos

why are the figures presented to an auditor not sufficient for absolute reliance

what are the things we need to check in statutory audit of bank?

With internal audit we always require to be careful of any manipulations within the company itself. Errors and frauds within the company cannot be denied /overlooked at any cost.

Co-operative Societies and Parastatals Co-operative Societies An audit in this case is carried out as a general audit except you should notice that the auditor is appoi

The Accounting System ISA 400 Risk Assessment and Internal Control accounting system are the sequence of tasks and records of an entity by which transactions are procedure as a

Issues for Finance Leases For the leases such have been categorize as finance leases, a model uses to be checked for the following issues: (i) Check technique used to split

Higher  normal risk Several audit assignments involve high audit risk and usually in any client there will always be at least one high risk area.  Indications that an audit has


Indications of inapplicability of Going Concern Unfortunately, Insolvency is a development industry as the economy suffers a down turn and consequently for a majority of enter