Good faith - meetings and resolutions, Business Law and Ethics

Good Faith - meetings and resolutions:

The directors must act in good faith when calling a meeting,.  Thus, in Cannon v Tasks, the directors called the annual general meeting at an earlier date than was usual for the company to hold it.  Their intention in doing so was to ensure that transfers of shares to certain persons who were likely to oppose some of their proposals would not be registered in time so that they would be unable to vote.  An injunction stopping the meeting from being held was granted.  However, once the directors have called the meeting they cannot postpone or cancel it.  For example, in Smith v Paringa Mines Ltd, a notice was issued purporting to postpone the holding of a general meeting of shareholders which had previously been duly convened.  One of the directors of the company who was in disagreement with the remainder of the board attended the meeting together with several shareholders.  It was held that resolutions passed at the meeting were valid and effective.  The purported postponement of the meeting was inoperative since the articles pursuant to which the meeting had ben convened did not give specific power to postpone a convened meeting.  The proper course is for the meeting to be held and, with the consent of the majority of those present and voting, adjourned.

Posted Date: 1/12/2013 5:29:59 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Good faith - meetings and resolutions, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Good faith - meetings and resolutions, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Good faith - meetings and resolutions Discussions

Write discussion on Good faith - meetings and resolutions
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Types of General Meeting: The Statutory Meeting           By section 130 every public company limited by shares and every public company limited by guarantee and having a

QUESTION 1 Corruption is the cancer eating at the heart of good governance of public institutions. Discuss QUESTION 2 The Prevention of Corruption Act 2002 is dangerous

Contracts of Guarantee There the Law of Contract Act, 1961, S.3 (1) provides as follow: Actually "No suit shall be brought whereby to charge the defendant upon any type of

Legal Protection  - significant instances: There are however a few but significant instances in which the Companies Act and the general law prescribe certain legal limits on t

Provisions Which Prevent Capital Going Out Of The Company: In Trevor v Whitworth (1887) Lord Watson stated: "Paid-up capital may be diminished or lost in the course of the

The impact of behaviour on the policy agenda To see the impact of behaviour, on the policy agenda and outcomes, which is generally not apparent, one way is to focus on the basi

Question 1: Mr Ben is the director of ABC Ltd. He wishes to know whether he has any responsibility under the OSHA regarding the presence of the following in his enterprise:

Forms of action: A minority of shareholders or an individual shareholder suing under one of the above exceptions may institute one of the following actions i) A personal ac

What is volenti non fit injury? Volenti: Consent specified by a claimant to the defendant is this implicitly, through explicitly or action to be negligent will not succee

DISADVANTAGES: Whether delegated or subsidiary legislation has been criticised just to a variety of reasons, the main ones being that it is:as; (a)   Less democratic Whe