Give a strictly 2-local automaton, Theory of Computation

Let L3 = {aibcj | i, j ≥ 0}. Give a strictly 2-local automaton that recognizes L3. Use the construction of the proof to extend the automaton to one that recognizes L3. Give a path through your extended automaton corresponding to a string in L*3. and show how the argument of the proof splits it into paths through your original automaton.

Posted Date: 3/22/2013 1:04:34 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Give a strictly 2-local automaton, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Give a strictly 2-local automaton, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Give a strictly 2-local automaton Discussions

Write discussion on Give a strictly 2-local automaton
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Computations are deliberate for processing information. Computability theory was discovered in the 1930s, and extended in the 1950s and 1960s. Its basic ideas have become part of

The fact that regular languages are closed under Boolean operations simpli?es the process of establishing regularity of languages; in essence we can augment the regular operations

We now add an additional degree of non-determinism and allow transitions that can be taken independent of the input-ε-transitions. Here whenever the automaton is in state 1

Theorem The class of recognizable languages is closed under Boolean operations. The construction of the proof of Lemma 3 gives us a DFA that keeps track of whether or not a give

Normal forms are important because they give us a 'standard' way of rewriting and allow us to compare two apparently different grammars G1  and G2. The two grammars can be shown to

A problem is said to be unsolvable if no algorithm can solve it. The problem is said to be undecidable if it is a decision problem and no algorithm can decide it. It should be note

The fact that the Recognition Problem is decidable gives us another algorithm for deciding Emptiness. The pumping lemma tells us that if every string x ∈ L(A) which has length grea

Can you say that B is decidable? If you somehow know that A is decidable, what can you say about B?

The computation of an SL 2 automaton A = ( Σ, T) on a string w is the maximal sequence of IDs in which each sequential pair of IDs is related by |- A and which starts with the in