Generalization of the interpretation of local automata, Theory of Computation

The generalization of the interpretation of strictly local automata as generators is similar, in some respects, to the generalization of Myhill graphs. Again, the set of possible symbols that may appear at any given point depends only on the previous k - 1 symbols. Here this is realized by taking the factors to be tiles and allowing a tile labeled σ2, . . . , σk, σk+1 to be placed over the last k-1 symbols of a tile labeled σ1, σ2, . . . , σk. Again, the process starts with a tile labeled 'x  ' and ends when a tile labeled '  x' is placed. Strings of length less than k - 1 are generated with a single tile.

Note that there is a sense in which this mechanism is the dual of the k-local Myhill graphs. In the graphs, the vertices are labeled with the pre?x of the factors in the automaton and the edges are labeled with the last symbol of the label of the node the edge is incident to. It is those edge labels that call out the string being recognized and the initial k - 1 positions of the string label the edges incident from ‘x'. Here it is the exposed symbols that call out the string being generated and these are the initial symbols of the tiles. And the ?nal k -1 symbols of the string are the symbols labeling the last tile, the one labeled with ‘x'.

Posted Date: 3/22/2013 1:29:55 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Generalization of the interpretation of local automata, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Generalization of the interpretation of local automata, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Generalization of the interpretation of local automata Discussions

Write discussion on Generalization of the interpretation of local automata
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
A finite, nonempty ordered set will be called an alphabet if its elements are symbols, or characters. A finite sequence of symbols from a given alphabet will be called a string ove

The project 2 involves completing and modifying the C++ program that evaluates statements of an expression language contained in the Expression Interpreter that interprets fully pa

Find the Regular Grammar for the following Regular Expression:                    a(a+b)*(ab*+ba*)b.

Theorem The class of recognizable languages is closed under Boolean operations. The construction of the proof of Lemma 3 gives us a DFA that keeps track of whether or not a give

Can v find the given number is palindrome or not using turing machine

What is the Best way to write algorithm and construct flow chart? What is Computer? How to construct web page and Designe it?

Let G be a graph with n > 2 vertices with (n2 - 3n + 4)/2 edges. Prove that G is connected.

One of the first issues to resolve, when exploring any mechanism for defining languages is the question of how to go about constructing instances of the mechanism which define part

As de?ned the powerset construction builds a DFA with many states that can never be reached from Q′ 0 . Since they cannot be reached from Q′ 0 there is no path from Q′ 0 to a sta

s->0A0|1B1|BB A->C B->S|A C->S|null find useless symbol?