Generalization of the interpretation of local automata, Theory of Computation

The generalization of the interpretation of strictly local automata as generators is similar, in some respects, to the generalization of Myhill graphs. Again, the set of possible symbols that may appear at any given point depends only on the previous k - 1 symbols. Here this is realized by taking the factors to be tiles and allowing a tile labeled σ2, . . . , σk, σk+1 to be placed over the last k-1 symbols of a tile labeled σ1, σ2, . . . , σk. Again, the process starts with a tile labeled 'x  ' and ends when a tile labeled '  x' is placed. Strings of length less than k - 1 are generated with a single tile.

Note that there is a sense in which this mechanism is the dual of the k-local Myhill graphs. In the graphs, the vertices are labeled with the pre?x of the factors in the automaton and the edges are labeled with the last symbol of the label of the node the edge is incident to. It is those edge labels that call out the string being recognized and the initial k - 1 positions of the string label the edges incident from ‘x'. Here it is the exposed symbols that call out the string being generated and these are the initial symbols of the tiles. And the ?nal k -1 symbols of the string are the symbols labeling the last tile, the one labeled with ‘x'.

Posted Date: 3/22/2013 1:29:55 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Generalization of the interpretation of local automata, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Generalization of the interpretation of local automata, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Generalization of the interpretation of local automata Discussions

Write discussion on Generalization of the interpretation of local automata
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
can you plz help with some project ideas relatede to DFA or NFA or anything

Both L 1 and L 2 are SL 2 . (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.) We claim that L 1 ∪ L 2 ∈ SL 2 . To see this, suppose, by way of con


proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand the meaning of distinguished position .

s-> AACD A-> aAb/e C->aC/a D-> aDa/bDb/e

Lemma 1 A string w ∈ Σ* is accepted by an LTk automaton iff w is the concatenation of the symbols labeling the edges of a path through the LTk transition graph of A from h?, ∅i to

Claim Under the assumptions above, if there is an algorithm for checking a problem then there is an algorithm for solving the problem. Before going on, you should think a bit about

how many pendulum swings will it take to walk across the classroom?

De?nition Deterministic Finite State Automaton: For any state set Q and alphabet Σ, both ?nite, a ?nite state automaton (FSA) over Q and Σ is a ?ve-tuple (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F), w

Myhill graphs also generalize to the SLk case. The k-factors, however, cannot simply denote edges. Rather the string σ 1 σ 2 ....... σ k-1 σ k asserts, in essence, that if we hav