Fraudulent trading, Business Law and Ethics

Fraudulent Trading:

Section 323 provides that if, in the course of the  winding up of a company, it appears that any business of the company has been carried on with intent to defraud creditors of the company or creditors of any other  person, or for any fraudulent purpose, the court, on the application of the official receiver or the liquidator or any creditor or contributory of the company may, if it thinks proper so to do, declare that any persons who were knowingly parties to the carrying on of the business in manner aforesaid shall be personally responsible,  without any limitation of liability, for all or any of the debts or other liabilities of the company as the  court may direct.

The personal liability of the person concerned for the company's debts is what constitutes, in an extremely loose sense, an instance of lifting the veil of incorporation. The corresponding section of the English Companies Act is invariably cited in English company law text-books as an instance of lifting the veil. The citation, though hallowed by English academic tradition, is logically  untenable.

No Kenya case appears to have been decided under the  section. However, the relevant English cases do suggest that to be "knowingly parties" to fraudulent trading  under the section some positive step must have been taken by those concerned: Re: Maidstone Building Provisions   Ltd (10).

It should be noted that, on its literal construction,  s.323 appears to be wider than s.33 because it also  covers liabilities other than debts, such as liability in tort, or damages for breach of contract. It can also be invoked against directors, members or anybody else who participated in the fraudulent trading. However, the  obvious limitations of the section is that it can only be invoked on a winding up and the applicant must prove fraud.

If the liquidator applies to the court any money received is distributed to creditors generally and forms part of the general assets of the company: Re William C Leitch Ltd (No 2) (II). However, if a creditor applies the  court may award him his actual loss or, alternatively, order the defendants to pay his actual debt: Re: Cyona Distributors Ltd (12).

Posted Date: 1/12/2013 2:08:02 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Fraudulent trading, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Fraudulent trading, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Fraudulent trading Discussions

Write discussion on Fraudulent trading
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Glenda has taken a household insurance on her classic Queenslander home in North Queensland.  At the time of application, the insurer "URINSURED" asked various questions regarding

Question: You are the manager of a restaurant and receive a letter from a customer complaining about the quality of service and the rudeness of one member of your staff. You ha

What are the main areas of case law? Case law: There are two main areas, as follows: • Common law: It is an amalgamation of past cases that are used to make decision

15 cases under sale of goods act within the year 2000- 2016?

QUESTION 1 The use made of decision-making bodies such as commissions, boards, tribunals and statutory bodies for the purpose of achieving celerity in public affairs opens the

Defects in Appointment: S.181 provides that a director's acts shall be valid despite any defect that may afterwards be discovered in his appointment or qualification. This pro

Question1 Clayton's case is considered to be one of the most essential legal decisions in banking laws that established the principle of the order of application of credits agains

Question 1: Constructive dismissal is inherently different from dismissal in the sense that it is the employee who necessarily takes the initiative in considering the contract

Article 4 - State Responsibilty Article 4. Under this Article a State shall be responsible for those territories in its jurisdiction which have different status under its domes

Explain United Nations General Assembly A treaty may also be referred to as a Convention, Protocol, Agreement and Declaration. There are no legal reasons for using different na