Fraudulent trading, Business Law and Ethics

Fraudulent Trading:

Section 323 provides that if, in the course of the  winding up of a company, it appears that any business of the company has been carried on with intent to defraud creditors of the company or creditors of any other  person, or for any fraudulent purpose, the court, on the application of the official receiver or the liquidator or any creditor or contributory of the company may, if it thinks proper so to do, declare that any persons who were knowingly parties to the carrying on of the business in manner aforesaid shall be personally responsible,  without any limitation of liability, for all or any of the debts or other liabilities of the company as the  court may direct.

The personal liability of the person concerned for the company's debts is what constitutes, in an extremely loose sense, an instance of lifting the veil of incorporation. The corresponding section of the English Companies Act is invariably cited in English company law text-books as an instance of lifting the veil. The citation, though hallowed by English academic tradition, is logically  untenable.

No Kenya case appears to have been decided under the  section. However, the relevant English cases do suggest that to be "knowingly parties" to fraudulent trading  under the section some positive step must have been taken by those concerned: Re: Maidstone Building Provisions   Ltd (10).

It should be noted that, on its literal construction,  s.323 appears to be wider than s.33 because it also  covers liabilities other than debts, such as liability in tort, or damages for breach of contract. It can also be invoked against directors, members or anybody else who participated in the fraudulent trading. However, the  obvious limitations of the section is that it can only be invoked on a winding up and the applicant must prove fraud.

If the liquidator applies to the court any money received is distributed to creditors generally and forms part of the general assets of the company: Re William C Leitch Ltd (No 2) (II). However, if a creditor applies the  court may award him his actual loss or, alternatively, order the defendants to pay his actual debt: Re: Cyona Distributors Ltd (12).

Posted Date: 1/12/2013 2:08:02 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Fraudulent trading, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Fraudulent trading, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Fraudulent trading Discussions

Write discussion on Fraudulent trading
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Select a manufacturing organization and find out the ethical issues of the organization in the following areas: Production: Marketing & sales: Human Resources & employee relatio

Question 1: The question of morality of Public Servants has become a public issue nowadays. What according to you are the factors that have contributed to such a situation?

Myra, another student, was very unhappy with her grade on the midterm. The following week, she arrived at the class about 20 minutes early and waited for the instructor t

What is vicarious liability? Liability of the employer and employee: An employer may be liable like a result of a negligent action executed through the employee. It is term

Implied Powers:                                     The statement of Lord Cairns in 1875 in Ashbury Rail Co Ltd v Riche (22) to the effect that a contract beyond the objects o

Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of thes

State about the Stages in the policy process Stages in the policy process are generally conceptualized within a broader environment governed by constitutional rules, political

Rights of Guarantor Against Creditor Consequently the rights of the guarantor are: like (a) Further at any time after that the guaranteed debt such has become due and such prev

Question 1: " One of those general precepts of our law of contract is that covenants legally entered into cannot be revoked except by the mutual consent of the parties theret

American citizens can utilize their Courts only under certain conditions and circumstances. That is, there are both formal and informal "barriers" to access the legal system.