Fraudulent trading, Business Law and Ethics

Fraudulent Trading:

Section 323 provides that if, in the course of the  winding up of a company, it appears that any business of the company has been carried on with intent to defraud creditors of the company or creditors of any other  person, or for any fraudulent purpose, the court, on the application of the official receiver or the liquidator or any creditor or contributory of the company may, if it thinks proper so to do, declare that any persons who were knowingly parties to the carrying on of the business in manner aforesaid shall be personally responsible,  without any limitation of liability, for all or any of the debts or other liabilities of the company as the  court may direct.

The personal liability of the person concerned for the company's debts is what constitutes, in an extremely loose sense, an instance of lifting the veil of incorporation. The corresponding section of the English Companies Act is invariably cited in English company law text-books as an instance of lifting the veil. The citation, though hallowed by English academic tradition, is logically  untenable.

No Kenya case appears to have been decided under the  section. However, the relevant English cases do suggest that to be "knowingly parties" to fraudulent trading  under the section some positive step must have been taken by those concerned: Re: Maidstone Building Provisions   Ltd (10).

It should be noted that, on its literal construction,  s.323 appears to be wider than s.33 because it also  covers liabilities other than debts, such as liability in tort, or damages for breach of contract. It can also be invoked against directors, members or anybody else who participated in the fraudulent trading. However, the  obvious limitations of the section is that it can only be invoked on a winding up and the applicant must prove fraud.

If the liquidator applies to the court any money received is distributed to creditors generally and forms part of the general assets of the company: Re William C Leitch Ltd (No 2) (II). However, if a creditor applies the  court may award him his actual loss or, alternatively, order the defendants to pay his actual debt: Re: Cyona Distributors Ltd (12).

Posted Date: 1/12/2013 2:08:02 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Fraudulent trading, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Fraudulent trading, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Fraudulent trading Discussions

Write discussion on Fraudulent trading
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Eagle Sales Company owns a warehouse, subject to a mortgage obtained from First National Bank. Separately, Eagle and First National obtain insurance policies from Good Hands Insura

Define the Strategic Voting and Policy Process Now we take up an important issue with respect to policy process. In standard models, where a single vote is taken directly as re

Warranties - Terms used in Contract Conversely the following are the warranties implied by the Act like: (a) Quiet possession with (s.14 (b)). However this provision is int


(a) Section 63 of the Employment Relations Act provides as follows: "The parties to a labour dispute may jointly refer such dispute for voluntary arbitration to the Tribunal or

This project requires you to choose an organisation of your own choice and discuss on the following with respect to your chosen organisation: External Environment Mega

Q. Impact on businesses of phoenix activity? In 1996 the Australian Securities Commission (ASC), published a report on phoenix activity titled Phoenix Activities and Insolvent

Is there a demand for paralegals in the blackbelt area of alabama

Explain Self determination Self determination is actually the foundation of United Nations (UN) Charter. It is defined as a right of people to determine and to choose their ow

F.O.B. Contracts - Import and Export Trade Under an f.o.b. like free on board contract it is the duty of like the seller to put the goods on board a ship to the purpose of the