Fraud or improper conduct, Business Law and Ethics

Fraud or improper conduct:

English courts have intervened on numerous occasions and lifted the veil of incorporation in order to circumvent a fraudulent or improper design by a bunch of scheming promoters or shareholders. This is illustrated by the decisions in Jones and Another v Lipman and Another (13) and Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne (14). The court's order in the latter case is usually cited as an instance of  lifting the veil but it should be noted that the  defendant (Horne) was not a member of the company and, in principle, no veil existed between him and the company which would have been lifted by the court. It is rather an instance of the court regarding the company as Mr Horne in another form ("alter ego").

Enemy Character

A company may be regarded as an enemy if, inter alia, all or substantially all of its shares are held by alien  enemies. This is illustrated by Daimler Co Ltd v  Continental Tyre & Rubber Co (Great Britain) Ltd (15). Since there appears to be no Kenya case on the point, the principles summarised by Lord Parker may be useful guidance to a Kenyan who might have to determine, in a given case, whether a particular company is to be  regarded as a friend or enemy of Kenya.

Posted Date: 1/12/2013 2:10:04 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Fraud or improper conduct, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Fraud or improper conduct, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Fraud or improper conduct Discussions

Write discussion on Fraud or improper conduct
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Interpretation of Constitution - High Court After then under Section 67(1) of the Constitution gives that whether any question as to the interpretation of the constitution ari

Order of application of assets: The order of application of assets is therefore as follows: (a) secured creditors who have fixed charges are entitled to be paid out of thei

Question 1: ‘There has been considerable development from the time of the Industrial Associations Ordinance 1938 to the present time of the Employment Relations Act 200

Question 1: a) Explain the four principles of effective financial regulations. b) Describe briefly the various regulatory tools used to achieve objectives of financ

Duty of an auditor: The duty of an auditor generally was very carefully considered by this court in RE: LONDON AND GENERAL BANK (1895) and I cannot usefully add anything to wh

Jerry contracted with Sally to purchase Sally’s Restaurant for $50,000ion #Minimum 100 words accepted#

Houghland, a passenger in one of McAnn's buses, had his suitcase stored in a luggage comp of the bus for a trip from Brisbane to Cairns. The suitcase was lost during the course of

Remedies of the Buyer - Sales of Goods (a)Damages for non-delivery Section number 51 (1) provides that whether the seller wrongfully neglects or refuses to deliver the go

As part of this project, expert input was provided by employment law specialists Herbert Geer. Herbert Geer raised the possibility that the FWO could recover amounts lost by indivi

Question 1: (i) Explain clearly the difference between Individual Bargaining and Collective Bargaining highlighting with examples the contexts in which each of them applies.