Find the perfect sub game nash equilibrium, Game Theory

Suppose that the incumbent monopolist, in the previous question, can decide (before anything else happens) to make an irreversible investment in extra Capacity (C), or Not (N). If it does so invest, there is an additional fixed cost of $4m to the incumbent monopolist, whether or not the extra capacity is used. The only time that the extra capacity would get used is if the monopolist decides to fight the entrant: it will then make a profit of £2m (which is inclusive of the cost of the extra capacity), instead of £0m because the existence of the extra capacity will make it cheaper to flood the market. Player P's payoffs remain unchanged. In this case, denote the strategy set for P as {E, S} and that for M as {C, N, A, F} : Find the perfect sub game Nash Equilibrium, now, typing your answer as either (C, S) , (C,E, F) , (C,E,A) , (N, S) , (N,E, F) or (N;E;A) ; but remember the brackets, commas, upper case letters, AND no spaces.

Posted Date: 3/9/2013 5:46:04 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Find the perfect sub game nash equilibrium, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Find the perfect sub game nash equilibrium, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Find the perfect sub game nash equilibrium Discussions

Write discussion on Find the perfect sub game nash equilibrium
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Game Theory: (prisoner's dilemma) Consider the following 2 x 2 pricing game, where rms choose whether to price High or Low simultaneously. Find the equilibrium in dominant s

Rollback equilibrium       (b) In the rollback equilibrium, A and B vote For while C and D vote Against; this leads to payoffs of (3, 4, 3, 4). The complete equil

Paired Prisoners' Dilemma Students can be paired off and instructed to play several ver-sions of a particular game with a prisoners' dilemma structure.Provide each pair with a

Any participant in a very game who (i)  contains a nontrivial set of methods (more than one) and (ii) Selects among the methods primarily based on payoffs. If a player is non

A strategy is weakly dominant if, no matter what the other players do, the strategy earns a player a payoff a minimum of as high as the other strategy, and, the strategy earns a st

One charm of evolutionary game theory is that it permits for relaxation of the normal fully-informed rational actor assumption. People, or agents, are assumed to be myopic, within

The following is a payoff matrix for a non-cooperative simultaneous move game between 2 players. The payoffs are in the order (Player 1; Player 2): What is the Dominant Strat

The notion that those that don't contribute to some project might nevertheless get pleasure from it (free riders), evidenced in games like the tragedy of the commons and public pro

A strategy is dominated if, no matter what the other players do, the strategy earns a player a smaller payoff than another strategy. Hence, a method is dominated if it's invariably

saaaaaaasfffffffffffffffffffaaaczzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz