Customer Service Chat
Get quote & make Payment
fighting for survival, Game Theory
Two animals are fighting over a prey. The prey is worth v to each animal. The cost of fighting is c1 for the first animal (player 1) and c2 for the second animal (player 2). If they both act aggressively (hawkish) and get into a fight, they split the prey in two equal parts but suffer the cost of fighting. If both act peacefully (dovish) then they also split the prey in two equal parts but without incurring any cost. If one acts dovish and the other hawkish, there is no fight and the hawkish gets the prey.
(2.1) Write down the normal form of the game (the bimatrix of strategies and payoffs).
(2.2) Find the Nash Equilibria for all possible parameter configurations and given the following restrictions: v > 0, c1 > c2 > 0, v ?= 2c1 and v ?= 2c2.
Posted Date: 10/15/2012 6:52:04 AM | Location : United States
Ask an Expert
fighting for survival, Assignment Help, Ask Question on fighting for survival, Get Answer, Expert's Help, fighting for survival Discussions
Write discussion on fighting for survival
Your posts are moderated
Write your message here..
Determine the pure strategy nash equilibria, a) Define the term Nash equili...
a) Define the term Nash equilibrium b) You are given the following pay-off matrix: Strategies for player 1 Strategies for player 2
Combination of sequential and simultanous game, To give Mom a day of rest,...
To give Mom a day of rest, Dad Plans to take his two children, Bart and Cassie, on an outing on Sunday.Bart prefers to go to the amusement park (A), Whereas Cassie prefers to go to
Order condition for identification, This condition is based on a counting ...
This condition is based on a counting rule of the variables included and excluded from the particular equation. It is a necessary but no sufficient condition for the identi
Equilibrium payoffs, Equilibrium payoffs a) The reward system changes...
Equilibrium payoffs a) The reward system changes payoffs for Player A, but does not change the equilibrium strategies in the game. Player A still takes the money at the fir
Trede cycle theory, what are the theories of financial crisis
what are the theories of financial crisis
Strategies against hostage takers, Strategies against Hostage Takers T...
Strategies against Hostage Takers T ypical Situations Terrorists: usually have several hostages, demands are polit- ical, may be fanatics, location may be public or sec
Backward induction, Backward induction is an iterative procedure for resolv...
Backward induction is an iterative procedure for resolving finite general form or sequential games. First, one decides the finest policy of the player who makes the last move of th
Positive add, In a positive add game, the combined payoffs of all players a...
In a positive add game, the combined payoffs of all players aren't identical in each outcome of the sport. This differs from constant add (or zero add) games during which all outco
Proxy bidder , A proxy bidder represents the interests of a bidder not phys...
A proxy bidder represents the interests of a bidder not physically gift at the auction. Typically, the bidder can inform his proxy of the most quantity he's willing to pay, and als
Finding Equilibrium in Game Theory, This is Case of Competitive Games. ...
This is Case of Competitive Games. Player 2 L R Player 1 L (60,40) (70,30) R (65,35) (60,40) Are either have dominant st
Accounting Assignment Help
Economics Assignment Help
Finance Assignment Help
Statistics Assignment Help
Physics Assignment Help
Chemistry Assignment Help
Math Assignment Help
Biology Assignment Help
English Assignment Help
Management Assignment Help
Engineering Assignment Help
Programming Assignment Help
Computer Science Assignment Help
Why Us ?
~24x7 hrs Support
~Quality of Work
~Time on Delivery
~Privacy of Work
Human Resource Management
Literature Review Writing Help
Follow Us |
T & C
Copyright by ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt. Ltd.