fighting for survival, Game Theory

Two animals are fighting over a prey. The prey is worth v to each animal. The cost of fighting is c1 for the first animal (player 1) and c2 for the second animal (player 2). If they both act aggressively (hawkish) and get into a fight, they split the prey in two equal parts but suffer the cost of fighting. If both act peacefully (dovish) then they also split the prey in two equal parts but without incurring any cost. If one acts dovish and the other hawkish, there is no fight and the hawkish gets the prey.
(2.1) Write down the normal form of the game (the bimatrix of strategies and payoffs).
(2.2) Find the Nash Equilibria for all possible parameter configurations and given the following restrictions: v > 0, c1 > c2 > 0, v ?= 2c1 and v ?= 2c2.
Posted Date: 10/15/2012 6:52:04 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- fighting for survival, Assignment Help, Ask Question on fighting for survival, Get Answer, Expert's Help, fighting for survival Discussions

Write discussion on fighting for survival
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
a) Define the term Nash equilibrium b) You are given the following pay-off matrix:   Strategies for player 1   Strategies for player 2

A game is one among complete data if all factors of the sport are common information. Specifically, every player is awake to all different players, the timing of the sport, and als

An auction during which many (more than one) things are offered for sale. Mechanisms for allocating multiple units embody discriminatory and uniform worth auctions.

Discussion in the preceding section suggests that if we want to measure a given hnction belonging to a simultaneous-equations model, the hnction must be fairly stable over the samp

Eighteenth century British mathematician who recognized a method for probabilistic mathematical inference. His Bayes Theorem, published posthumously, treats probability as a logic.

Please let me know if you can assist with the following assignment immediately. http://www.viewdocsonline.com/document/vkz2u6

This condition is based on a counting rule of the variables included and excluded from the particular equation. It is a necessary but no sufficient condition for the identi

Scenario Two conspirators are arrested and interrogated separately. If one implicates the opposite, he might go free whereas the opposite receives a life sentence. Yet, if each

Eighteenth century Dutch mathematician codified the notion of expected utility as a revolutionary approach to risk. He noted that folks don't maximize expected returns however expe

1  A, Explain how a person can be free to choose but his or her choices are casually determined by past event 2  B , Draw the casual tree for newcomb's problem when Eve can't pe