Explain strategic bidding problem, Microeconomics

Two firms, A and B, are planning to bid for a contract of Motorway extension in Mauritius. Suppose: (1) firm B is a newly established company and has already incurred a start-up cost of $25 million; (2) A and B simultaneously choose to quote either a high or low price; (3) if both A and B quote the same price, the contract is awarded to A because it has been in the market for a long period of time; (4) if both firms submit a high price, A nets $300 million; (5) if both firms submit a low price, A nets $100 million; (6) if A prices high and B prices low, B nets $100 million (after the initial investment) and A nets $0.

(a) Construct the strategic-form game for the above strategic bidding problem.

(b) Explain the dominant strategy and the Nash equilibrium of the game.

(c) The government is the big winner in this case. Explain why.

Posted Date: 10/23/2013 4:03:18 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Explain strategic bidding problem, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Explain strategic bidding problem, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Explain strategic bidding problem Discussions

Write discussion on Explain strategic bidding problem
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Q. Explain about Capacity Utilization? Capacity Utilization: A company or economy's capacity represents maximum amount of output it can produce. Rate of capacity utilization, h

Consider the following insurance market. There are two states of the world, B and G, and two types of consumers, H and L, who have probabilities pH =0.5 and pL =0.25 (high and low

Long run equilibrium - Perfect competition: In the long-run, on the other hand, the firm in perfect competition is making normal profit or zero economic profit as shown in Fig

if the inverse demand curve is p=120-Qand the marginal cost is constant at 10, how does charging the monopoly a specific tax of 10 per unit affect the monopoly optimum and the welf

Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

illustrate a long-run equilbrium using diagrams for the gold market and for a representative gold mine


How is the wrong conclusion result in necessary condition not in the sufficient condition? This is often heard that the market institution must not be used based onto the fact

how microeconomic issues maybe represented using production posibility curve