Expenditure trends and pattern, Microeconomics

Expenditure Trends and Pattern:

Total expenditure of the Centre has risen twice as fast as total revenue, although much of this reflects rising interest payments. Revenue expenditure consists of  interest payments, subsidies, public administration, and defence expenditure. The non-plan expenditure of the Central Government forms almost three-fourths of the aggregate expenditure, with the revenue component constituting a significant proportion. The principal non-plan components are  interest payments, defence, subsidies and non-plan grants to States and Union Territories (UTs) on the revenue side, and non-plan loans to States and UTs on the capital side. While the rates of growth in defence and subsidies were contained substantially, the interest expenditure continues to strain Central finances.  

Furthermore, interest expenditure, on an average, absorbed 28.6 per cent of the revenue receipts during the eighties as compared with 46.4 per cent in the nineties. This reflects the mounting pressure on Centre's finances arising out of debt accumulation. Another major item of expenditure which exerted pressure on the Centre's finances is the non-plan loans to States and UTs against small savings. Thus, the earmarking of an increasing proportion of Centre's resources towards meeting non-plan expenditure has resulted in reducing the leverage of the Central Government in directing financial flows towards developmental needs. The inability on the part of the Government to raise larger revenue receipts in view of the growing expenditure commitments constituted yet another structural weakness of the Central finances.  

A rigid distinction between developmental and non-developmental expenditure with regard to their contribution to growth is somewhat difficult since certain non-developmental expenditure items such as expenditure on administrative services also exercise some influence, although of an indirect nature, on economic development. Within the developmental expenditure, the relative importance of social services has increased even though its share in total expenditure has been broadly stable. This outcome is due to a steady decline in the share of expenditure on economic services in total expenditure. There is little doubt that the country's infrastructure remains woefully inadequate. Even then, the Central Government's expenditure on infrastructure as a percentage of total expenditure is on the decline. Expenditure on infrastructure gets broadly classified under the head of capital expenditure. For the Centre, capital expenditure accounted for as little as 23.5 per cent of its overall expenditure, with the rest of the expenditure getting covered under revenue expenditure, accounting for 76.5 per cent of total expenditure. There was a large drop in the Centre's capital expenditure from 2000-2003. From 24 per cent during the early 1990s, it dropped by ten percentage points during 2000-2003. But it has now recovered to its original levels. As far as the Centre goes, 13 per cent of the total share of 17 per cent in GDP goes as revenue expenditure while the remaining 4 per cent gets counted as capital expenditure.   

There is probably little room to cut capital expenditures. Of course, in the future, the private sector rather than the Government should meet most of the enormous infrastructure needs of a growing economy. Further progress is needed in reductions in each of the four main areas of current spending.  

Posted Date: 11/15/2012 1:59:28 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Expenditure trends and pattern, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Expenditure trends and pattern, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Expenditure trends and pattern Discussions

Write discussion on Expenditure trends and pattern
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions

You are considering whether or not to go to graduate school. Well… there are many things to consider, of course, such as the type of job you would thus get, the opportunity to live

What is main difference between capital intensive goods and primary products?  Primary product means the major product in which the firm is dealing. Capital intensive good mea

Question 1: i) Derive and explain Harberger's (1954) welfare loss estimates of monopolizing a perfectly competitive firm. ii) What are the roles of advertising? Can it lead

Janet decides to play a game with her children, Jay and Jill (who are fraternal twins) and Mo. Each child is in their own room and cannot communicate with each other. Suppose Jill

2) Proctor & Gamble (P&G) and the Lever Co. decide to form a laundry detergent cartel for future sales in Europe. Lever is more efficient than P&G. a)illustrate graphically how the

what is histogram?

ref article :http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21587795-if-congress-fails-lift-limit-americas-debts-consequences-are   a.assume that the debt ceiling crisis

what is money? functions

Mamun has a weakly income of 600 dollars. Price of chocolate is 5 dollar and price of potato is taka 10. Both are normal goods. Show the income and substitution effect for each of