Evaluating capital-expenditure, Business Management

Evaluating Capital-Expenditure Proposals at Biotechnique Chemicals

In submitting a project for senior-management approval, the proposers had to identify it as belonging to one of four possible categories: (1) new product or market, (2) product or market extension, (3) engineering efficiency, or (4) safety or environment. The first three categories of proposals were subject to a system of four performance "hurdles", of which at least three had to be met for the proposal to be considered. The Glenlines project would be in the engineering efficiency category. The performance hurdles are:

1. Impact on earnings per share. For engineering-efficiency projects, the contribution to net income from contemplated projects had to be positive. This criterion was calculated as the average annual EPS contribution of the project over its entire economic life, using the number of outstanding shares at the most recent financial year-end used as the basis for the calculation. (At financial year end 1991, Biotechnique Chemicals had 92,891,240 shares outstanding.)

2. Payback. This criterion was defined as the number of years necessary for free cash flow of the project to amortize the initial project outlay completely. For engineering-efficiency projects, the maximum payback period was six years.

3. Discounted cash flow. DCF was defined as the present value of future cash flows of the project (at the discount rate of 13 percent for engineering-efficiency proposals), less the present value of the initial investment outlay. This net present value of free cash flows had to be positive.

4. Internal rate of return. IRR was defined as being that discount rate at which the present value of future free cash flows just equaled the initial outlay (in other words, the rate at which the NPV was 0). The IRR of engineering-efficiency projects had to be greater than 13 percent.

Posted Date: 2/16/2013 6:06:22 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Evaluating capital-expenditure, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Evaluating capital-expenditure, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Evaluating capital-expenditure Discussions

Write discussion on Evaluating capital-expenditure
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
The product which is rejected in final inspection represents a direct loss to the manufacturer. Therefore most companies have a system of review of the rejected product. This

During the course of the module you were asked to study the targeted market of three local brands. You have now been employed by an Apparel industry as Merchandiser, and you have b

Explain the different delivery styles that speakers can select for their presentation.

QUESTION The financial crisis in America reminded business organizations about the difficulty to plan in a very dynamic business environment. Many organizations were unprepared

How are Internet technologies affecting the structure and work roles of modern organizations? For example, will middle management wither away? Will companies consist primarily of s

QUESTION 1 Using examples from the local context, illustrate the arguments for and against the assumption of social responsibility by profit-making organisations QUESTIO

QUESTION a) The process of developing a presentation is a systematic one comprising three distinct phases. Describe in detail each one of these phases and explain their importa

Sales is about generating prospects, evaluating them for business opportunities, getting the requirement from them and giving adequate solutions so that it gets changed into Revenu

Identify and explain what you think Levi Strauss & Co. did well and did poorly in implementing its team reorganization. Be sure to relate your observations to Hackman''s research

Question 1: According to the instrumentality theory of motivation, money is the main motivating factor at work. This can explain the existence of performance related pay in man