Evaluating capital-expenditure, Business Management

Evaluating Capital-Expenditure Proposals at Biotechnique Chemicals

In submitting a project for senior-management approval, the proposers had to identify it as belonging to one of four possible categories: (1) new product or market, (2) product or market extension, (3) engineering efficiency, or (4) safety or environment. The first three categories of proposals were subject to a system of four performance "hurdles", of which at least three had to be met for the proposal to be considered. The Glenlines project would be in the engineering efficiency category. The performance hurdles are:

1. Impact on earnings per share. For engineering-efficiency projects, the contribution to net income from contemplated projects had to be positive. This criterion was calculated as the average annual EPS contribution of the project over its entire economic life, using the number of outstanding shares at the most recent financial year-end used as the basis for the calculation. (At financial year end 1991, Biotechnique Chemicals had 92,891,240 shares outstanding.)

2. Payback. This criterion was defined as the number of years necessary for free cash flow of the project to amortize the initial project outlay completely. For engineering-efficiency projects, the maximum payback period was six years.

3. Discounted cash flow. DCF was defined as the present value of future cash flows of the project (at the discount rate of 13 percent for engineering-efficiency proposals), less the present value of the initial investment outlay. This net present value of free cash flows had to be positive.

4. Internal rate of return. IRR was defined as being that discount rate at which the present value of future free cash flows just equaled the initial outlay (in other words, the rate at which the NPV was 0). The IRR of engineering-efficiency projects had to be greater than 13 percent.

Posted Date: 2/16/2013 6:06:22 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Evaluating capital-expenditure, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Evaluating capital-expenditure, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Evaluating capital-expenditure Discussions

Write discussion on Evaluating capital-expenditure
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Question : (i) With the growth of the tourism industry, coastal development projects have the potential to cause significant negative environmental impacts. Using appropriate

Estimate the Contribution of an E-Strategy to the Achievement of an Organisation''s Objectives

QUESTION 1 The process of delivering a presentation is a systematic one that involves thorough planning along with preparation and one of the main phases is developing the pre

QUESTION (a) What is Business Process Re-engineering (BPR)? (b) List down any four factors that contribute to the difficulties in implementing BPR (c) Explain the differe

Tourism development places additional pressure on the environmental resources upon which it is based, compromising the future prospects of the local population and, indeed, the ex

QUESTION (a) Communication flows up, down and across the chain of command. Explain the major differences between vertical and horizontal communication channels. (b) Identify

QUESTION Your Managing Director has asked you to prepare a presentation for the staff of the Human Resources Department who have no experience in interpersonal skills and how t

Most people do not have any comprehension of the magnitude of the total costs to the firm resulting from a new hire. This assignment will provide the student with an understanding

Question: The Twin Peaks Hotel is a mountain lodge with 200 rooms, 3 restaurants, 4 bars, and a 24 hour room service. The hotel has an urgent need to review its Beverage and Fo

Setting Different Levels and Recorder point : Just to avoid the chances of over and under investment as well as running short of an item during the course of production m