Equivalence of nfas and dfas, Theory of Computation

In general non-determinism, by introducing a degree of parallelism, may increase the accepting power of a model of computation. But if we subject NFAs to the same sort of analysis as we have used in de?ning DFAs we shall see that to simulate an NFA one needs only track ?nitely much information about each string. Consider, again, the example in which we modeled the computation of the NFA as a set of automata processing the input synchronously. In order to determine if a string w is accepted by the NFA all we need to do is to track, at each stage of the computation (i.e., at each pre?x of the input), the states of those automata. Since there is never any reason to include more than one automaton for each state, this will just be some subset of Q-in fact, it is easy to see that the set of states after processing w will be just ˆ δ(q0,w). Since Q is ?nite, it has ?nitely many subsets. Thus we can simulate an NFA with state set Q with a DFA that has a state for each subset of Q. The process of constructing a deterministic analog of a non-deterministic machine is known as determinization.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 2:55:40 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Equivalence of nfas and dfas, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Equivalence of nfas and dfas, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Equivalence of nfas and dfas Discussions

Write discussion on Equivalence of nfas and dfas
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
The path function δ : Q × Σ* → P(Q) is the extension of δ to strings: This just says that the path labeled ε from any given state q goes only to q itself (or rather never l

Exercise Show, using Suffix Substitution Closure, that L 3 . L 3 ∈ SL 2 . Explain how it can be the case that L 3 . L 3 ∈ SL 2 , while L 3 . L 3 ⊆ L + 3 and L + 3 ∈ SL

1. Simulate a TM with infinite tape on both ends using a two-track TM with finite storage 2. Prove the following language is non-Turing recognizable using the diagnolization

Our primary concern is to obtain a clear characterization of which languages are recognizable by strictly local automata and which aren't. The view of SL2 automata as generators le

Suppose G = (N, Σ, P, S) is a reduced grammar (we can certainly reduce G if we haven't already). Our algorithm is as follows: 1. Define maxrhs(G) to be the maximum length of the

All that distinguishes the de?nition of the class of Regular languages from that of the class of Star-Free languages is that the former is closed under Kleene closure while the lat


In general non-determinism, by introducing a degree of parallelism, may increase the accepting power of a model of computation. But if we subject NFAs to the same sort of analysis

A common approach in solving problems is to transform them to different problems, solve the new ones, and derive the solutions for the original problems from those for the new ones

The key thing about the Suffx Substitution Closure property is that it does not make any explicit reference to the automaton that recognizes the language. While the argument tha