Equilibrium analysis, Macroeconomics

A vital question is whether the equilibrium we have identified in labor market (with a high unemployment rate) can remain in long run. Will there not be adjustments which will take us back to a point with no unemployment? Keynesian justification for why unemployment will persist is as below. 

Goods market is in equilibrium as firms will sell everything they produce and demand for finished goods is satisfied. Firms then have no reason to hire more labor (they will just increase L when YD increases). And as the goods market is in equilibrium so they have no reason to change prices. 

Anyhow we have involuntary unemployment in the diagram above which may create a downward pressure on wages. In the cross model, this won't happen for the below arguments: 

1. Nominal wages are sticky, principally downwards. We barely ever observe cuts in nominal wages. 

2. Nominal wage cuts wouldn't help. With lower wages, income would fall, decreasing aggregate demand even more hence making the situation worse. Lower nominal wages will allow firms to lower prices. Though if prices fall as much as nominal wages, real wages will no, and we had stayed in same paragraph. 

As with classical model, we study most of the check model characteristics in an exercise book. A couple of comments, however, may be of interest already here.

  • It is difficult to illustrate long periods of high unemployment in classic model with the model of labor used there.
  • During the Great Depression in early 1930s (the great depression), it became increasingly apparent that traditional model had flaws. Unemployment was very high for a long time and any adjustment to the balance of labor market wasn't.
  • In Keynesian model, can the economy to be in balance even with a high level of involuntary unemployment and model appeared to be a good explanation for depression.
  • I check the model, financial policy is a very significant role. By increasing G so, the government can increase GDP and hence reduce unemployment.
  • The classic dichotomy between nominal and real variables will disappear in all Keynesian models.


Posted Date: 8/16/2013 1:19:13 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Equilibrium analysis, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Equilibrium analysis, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Equilibrium analysis Discussions

Write discussion on Equilibrium analysis
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Properties of indifference curve:   Property I: Higher indifference curve gives higher utility.      Explanation: Since all goods are non-satiated, larger consumpti

What are the requirements for something to be considered money? Why does the dollar have value?

difference between gdp at market price and nnp at factor cost

Comparative if Person can make 15 wristbands and hour and 3 potholders. What is the comparative advantage? If same person works 20 hours a week graph the possible combinations sh

Do some research and find the inflation rate and the level of unemployment in the U.S. economy for the past 40 years. Is there a relationship between the two? If so, what type of r

What is the opportunity cost of economic growth? Opportunity cost measures the cost of an economic option within terms of the next best option foregone. The government of a

The demand for nominal balances rises with the price level. At the similar time inflation causes the real demand for money to fall. Describe how these two assertions can be both co

If the marginal disutility of labor increases, the equilibrium real wage increases and the equilibrium quantity of labor goes up. True or false?

MEC vs MEI in detail

Assume a competitive industry with two hospitals. The hospitals compete in price (such that P = MC ), face the inverse demand curve =10 - Q , and have a constant marginal cost of