Empirical claim, Business Law and Ethics

One of the critical tasks we have as empirical political scientists is to assess the validity of the comments people around us make about the socio-political world. For this assignment, you are asked to assess whether there is truth to an empirical claim by analyzing data from the Canadian Election Studies of 2011.

You can choose to write your paper on one of the following five empirical claims:

1. Most Ontarians would not want to see big changes in welfare spending.

2. The average immigrant to Canada arrived before 1970.

3. Canadians considered health care by far the most important issue in the 2011 Canadian elections.

4. The average Canadian man does not like feminists. 

5. More than a third of all Canadians over 50 would like to see the gun registry scrapped entirely.

Guidelines for the data analysis  

In order to conduct a systematic investigation of the empirical claim you are analyzing, make sure to take the following steps:  

- Find appropriate variables

(Which of the questions in the Canadian Election Studies will be of most use to you? What kind of variables are they? Are there other questions that might be of use?)

- Groom your data

(Is it necessary to recode your variables? Are you sure missing data are coded as missing?)

- Select the right cases

(Is it necessary to employ a filter? Are you sure you are including all the cases you are interested in, and nothing more?)

- Visualize the data

(What does a first view at the data tell you? Is it necessary to combine some answer categories to get a better overview? Can you already make an estimated guess of whether there is support for the empirical claim?)

- Calculate the appropriate measures of central tendency and dispersion

(Taking into account the level of measurement, what are the most appropriate measures of central tendency and dispersion?)

- Calculate a confidence interval for a 95 percent confidence level (Are you calculating a confidence interval for a proportion or a mean?  Knowing that a confidence interval with a confidence level of 95 percent ranges from your point estimate plus and minus 1.96 standard errors, what is your confidence interval?)

Posted Date: 2/22/2013 2:28:06 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Empirical claim, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Empirical claim, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Empirical claim Discussions

Write discussion on Empirical claim
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
I am Lauren Garcia, I have an order my assignment, please answer me back here Describe what parts of business law are involved in the following scenario. What issues are involve

I will provide a cases from the media that have ethical implications. Please prepare a ppt presentation that: a) describes the issue/story (Clearly identify which case you ar

Explain the Nuclear law Nuclear law Nuclear Law is a branch of International Law that surrounds, regulates and administers issues regarding nuclear weapons. It is also ass

Length of Notice - Meetings and resolutions: S.133(1) provides that any provision of a company's articles shall be void in so far as it provides for the called of a meeting of

You are a Graduate Legal Officer employed in the Constitutional Policy Unit of the Australian Attorney-General's Department. Until this point, your supervisor, Rodger Dodger, has p

Ways which affect the behaviour of the policy maker There may be at least three ways this uncertainty may affect the behaviour of the policy maker. a) He may chose mainly th

RESERVE CAPITAL: The reserve capital is defined by S.62 of the Act as the portion of the issued but uncalled capital of a limited company which the company's members, by speci

Deadlock in the management: The company existed only to "work a particular patent" and as it could not do so it should be wound up. But if there are two or more alternative

Statutory safeguard - Non-accepting shareholders: The non-accepting shareholders have a further statutory safeguard.  Company A is not obliged to serve notice of intention to

Formation of Contract - Law of Contract However a legally binding agreement prepared between two or persons or more parties.  Whereas it has also been explained as a promise o