Discuss the ethical issues, Business Law and Ethics

An employee at the supermarket you manage mopped one of the aisles in the store and placed signs at the ends of the aisle to warn people not to use the aisle until the floor dried.  One customer walked around the sign, slipped, fell, and suffered serious injuries.  Her lawyer comes to you with the following story.  She says that she is going to sue the store for the negligence that led to the customer's injuries. However, she says that she doubts that she can win, since case law in the state makes it clear that the sign is considered a reasonable warning so that contributory negligence by the customer would eliminate the liability of the store.  This means that the customer will get nothing, but one can never be completely sure.  The worst part is that the customer has no insurance, has incurred large hospital bills, cannot work for several months, and has no source of support.

          The lawyer makes the following deal.  She will forgo any fee for the case and will sue only for an amount equal to the medical costs incurred and the wages lost, if you will agree to testify that there was no sign in place to warn that the floor was wet.  The payment will be made by the insurance company.  This will not affect your position with the insurance company, and you will save attorney's fees.  Should you make such a deal?  What if you knew that the law in most states would provide an award because their laws hold that warning signs are insufficient and a complete physical barrier has to be in place?  Discuss the ethical issues.

Posted Date: 3/1/2013 6:21:03 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Discuss the ethical issues, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Discuss the ethical issues, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Discuss the ethical issues Discussions

Write discussion on Discuss the ethical issues
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Disadvantage of a scheme of arrangement: The disadvantage of a scheme of arrangement is that it requires the preparation of elaborate documents and the observance of a strict

Question 1: (a) "A tourist resort which does business in a single currency is not exposed to currency risk." Discuss (use example to support your answer). (b) Case: Hedging

Complaints made against the auditors: These are the most simple principles that such have to be applied to cases of this description. I protest, however, against the notion

As a senior HR officer in Catastrophe Concepts HR department, you have been asked by George Chapel to prepare a management briefing regarding the situation. Your report should:

Description of terrorism UNSC has successfully come up with laws to deal with terrorism and with the help of the theory of self determination, use of force and IHL, tried to re

QUESTION 1 Describe the Public Procurement Legal Framework of Mauritius QUESTION 2 Explain the following, within the meaning of the Competition Act: a. collusive agreem

Question 1: Constructive dismissal is inherently different from dismissal in the sense that it is the employee who necessarily takes the initiative in considering the contract

Different ways through which States create International law There are different ways through which States create International law. International conventions mentioned under a

DISCLAIMER OF ASSETS: The liquidator has a statutory right of disclaimer of assets: s.135.  The rules are: (a)     he must obtain leave of the court; (b)     the right o

State about the underlying process - Law institutions The underlying process forms the basis of our next subtitle. The first point is, that if an optimal policy has been adopt