Discuss the ethical issues, Business Law and Ethics

An employee at the supermarket you manage mopped one of the aisles in the store and placed signs at the ends of the aisle to warn people not to use the aisle until the floor dried.  One customer walked around the sign, slipped, fell, and suffered serious injuries.  Her lawyer comes to you with the following story.  She says that she is going to sue the store for the negligence that led to the customer's injuries. However, she says that she doubts that she can win, since case law in the state makes it clear that the sign is considered a reasonable warning so that contributory negligence by the customer would eliminate the liability of the store.  This means that the customer will get nothing, but one can never be completely sure.  The worst part is that the customer has no insurance, has incurred large hospital bills, cannot work for several months, and has no source of support.

          The lawyer makes the following deal.  She will forgo any fee for the case and will sue only for an amount equal to the medical costs incurred and the wages lost, if you will agree to testify that there was no sign in place to warn that the floor was wet.  The payment will be made by the insurance company.  This will not affect your position with the insurance company, and you will save attorney's fees.  Should you make such a deal?  What if you knew that the law in most states would provide an award because their laws hold that warning signs are insufficient and a complete physical barrier has to be in place?  Discuss the ethical issues.

Posted Date: 3/1/2013 6:21:03 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Discuss the ethical issues, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Discuss the ethical issues, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Discuss the ethical issues Discussions

Write discussion on Discuss the ethical issues
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Statutory safeguard - Non-accepting shareholders: The non-accepting shareholders have a further statutory safeguard.  Company A is not obliged to serve notice of intention to

steeple analysis about setting up a buisiness

Explain The criminal jurisdiction The criminal jurisdiction is exercised on the basis of the following: 1. Nationality 2. Territory 3. Universal jurisdiction and 4. Specifi

Functions of Law: we discuss like, how can be utilized Functions of Law:;- are (i)         For Rules of law facilitate administration of justice.  It is an instrument used

Dennis and his brother, Otis, are charged with murdering Johnson. Eyewitnesses had seen the two defendants fighting with the victim outside a bar after midnight. Shortly afterwards

1. Each country in the world is a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO). 2. A federal court of the United States and a state court can both "hear," i.e., listen to the cl

Types of Precedents There a precedent may be as; A binding precedent here judge must tag along whereas he approves of it or not. Hence it is excludes his judicial discr

Reconstruction Under S.280: The essential features of this type of reconstruction have been described at 8.2.1(b).  It is subject to several disadvantages and is little used.

Determine the reasons of policy perspective The term system is needed for two reasons: i) It encompasses all sovereign states and therefore possesses the virtue of being com

Qualification Shares: S.183(1) provides that it shall be the duty of every director who is by the articles of the company required to hold a specified qualification, and who i