Discuss the ethical issues, Business Law and Ethics

An employee at the supermarket you manage mopped one of the aisles in the store and placed signs at the ends of the aisle to warn people not to use the aisle until the floor dried.  One customer walked around the sign, slipped, fell, and suffered serious injuries.  Her lawyer comes to you with the following story.  She says that she is going to sue the store for the negligence that led to the customer's injuries. However, she says that she doubts that she can win, since case law in the state makes it clear that the sign is considered a reasonable warning so that contributory negligence by the customer would eliminate the liability of the store.  This means that the customer will get nothing, but one can never be completely sure.  The worst part is that the customer has no insurance, has incurred large hospital bills, cannot work for several months, and has no source of support.

          The lawyer makes the following deal.  She will forgo any fee for the case and will sue only for an amount equal to the medical costs incurred and the wages lost, if you will agree to testify that there was no sign in place to warn that the floor was wet.  The payment will be made by the insurance company.  This will not affect your position with the insurance company, and you will save attorney's fees.  Should you make such a deal?  What if you knew that the law in most states would provide an award because their laws hold that warning signs are insufficient and a complete physical barrier has to be in place?  Discuss the ethical issues.

Posted Date: 3/1/2013 6:21:03 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Discuss the ethical issues, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Discuss the ethical issues, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Discuss the ethical issues Discussions

Write discussion on Discuss the ethical issues
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
QUESTION Albert approaches the National Transport Authority to have a taxi's license. The Chairman of the Authority, Mr. Smith, agrees to give him a license provided that Albert

Question 1: Critically analyse the major changes brought to Industrial Relations by the Employment Relations Act 2008? Question 2: Write short notes on the followings:

Alien Tort Claims Act Problem: You work at a New York law firm and have been invited by the partner you work for to attend a meeting with Mrs. Esther Kiobel and a dozen

Declaration and Payment: There is no provision in the Act dealing with payment of dividends. It is therefore governed by the provisions of the company's articles, failing whic

Calls On Contributories:                                       Every person who is a member of the company at the commencement of winding up and every past member is in princi

It has been estimated that about 6,000 phoenix companies operate in Australia, costing government and the community hundreds of millions of dollars per year and impacting on indi


Illegal Partnerships - Number of Partners However a partnership will be illegal in the following state of affairs: like;; (a)   Whether it is formed for an illegal purpose

Defects in Appointment: S.181 provides that a director's acts shall be valid despite any defect that may afterwards be discovered in his appointment or qualification. This pro

QUESTION1 Compare and contrast the Securities Act with the Insurance Act QUESTION 2 (a) What are the main stages of money laundering? (b) Explain the legal framework