Differences members and creditors voluntary wind up, Business Law and Ethics

Differences members and creditors voluntary wind up:

main differences between a members' and a creditors' voluntary winding up are that:

(a) in a creditors' voluntary winding up the liquidator, although responsible to members as well as creditors, is selected by the creditors.  In a members' voluntary winding up he is appointed by the members;

(b) in a creditors' voluntary winding up the liquidator must obtain the approval (usually) of the committee of inspection for the exercise of certain statutory powers.  In a members' voluntary winding up he obtains approval from the members in general meeting;

(c) there is a committee of inspection in a creditors' voluntary winding up with up to five members, a majority of whom being appointed by the creditors: s.288(1).  There is no committee in a members' voluntary winding up.

The effect is that the creditors have a decisive influence on the conduct of the liquidation.  This is reasonable since it is assumed (in the absence of a statutory declaration of solvency) that the company is unable to pay its debts in full.  The remaining assets will therefore be realized for the benefit of the creditors and the members get nothing (unless the company proves to be solvent after all).

Meetings are held in the same sequence as in a members' voluntary winding up but the meetings of creditors are called at the same intervals as the meetings of members and for similar purposes.

Posted Date: 1/15/2013 5:06:19 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Differences members and creditors voluntary wind up, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Differences members and creditors voluntary wind up, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Differences members and creditors voluntary wind up Discussions

Write discussion on Differences members and creditors voluntary wind up
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Main advantages - mergers and winding up: A scheme of arrangement under s.207 offers three main advantages: (a)     it can be used in circumstances to which s.210 and s.280

Function and Powers of Chairman: In the case of National Dwellings Society v Sykes Chitty, J. stated: "It is the duty of the chairman, and his function, to preserve order,

Question: Consider the following formulation of Kant's Categorical Imperative: ‘Act only to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal

Describe in detail about the European Monetary Union The experimental lab for international policy coordination has been the European Union where monetary unification of member

Games nations play Game analogy can be used to get the idea because the principal players, states reject any higher authority. Each state, take any player in a competitive game

State Article 30 of international law Article 30 further states that his or her private residence and papers, correspondence and property are all inviolable.

Explain the Causation, Remoteness and Contributory Negligence in short. Causation: When the accident was going to occur anyway then causation is not proved, which is a third

Irene walked into a store carrying a bottle of soda she had purchased a few days earlier. While in the store, she opened the bottle of soda and was drinking it while she

Had France adopted OECD convention on bribery ahead of these transactions would the firm''s behavior have differed?why?

What is the way of acquiring rights over a territory The way of acquiring rights over a territory is adjudication . It is a process in which the States consult an internation