Differences between registered companies and partnerships, Business Law and Ethics

Differences between registered companies and partnerships:

The basic differences between registered companies and partnerships are as follows:

(a) Formation

Registration is the legal pre-requisite for the formation of a registered company: Fort Hall Bakery Supply Co v Wangoe (1).

The Partnership Act does not prescribe registration   as a condition precedent to partnership formation.   A partnership may therefore be formed informally or,   if the partners deem it prudent, in writing under   a Partnership Deed or Articles.         

(b) Legal Status

A registered company enjoys the legal status of a body corporate which is conferred on it by the Companies Act.

A partnership is not a body corporate and is non-existent in the contemplation of the law. Such  business as appears to be carried on by it is in fact carried on by the individual partners.

(c) Number of Members

A registered private company must have at least two members under s.4 of the Companies Act and a maximum  of fifty members (excluding current and former  employees of the company who are also its members),  under s.30 of the Act. A public registered company must have at least seven members under s.4 of the Companies Act but without a prescribed upper limit. A partnership cannot consist of more than 20 partners.

(d) Transfer of Shares

Shares in a registered company are freely transferable unless the company's articles  incorporate restrictive provisions.

A partnership has no shares as such but a partner cannot transfer his interest in the firm to a third party unless all the partners have agreed to the   proposed transfer.                  

(e) Management

A company's members have no right to participate in the company's day to day management. Such  management is vested in the board of directors.

Partners have the right to participate in the firm's   day to day management since s.3 of the Partnership Act requires the business to be carried on "in  common". The right of participation in the firm's management is however not given to a partner who has limited his liability for the firm's debts.

 (f) Agency

A member is not, per se, an agent of the company: Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd (3). A partner is an  agent of the firm because the business is carried on "in common" by the partners themselves. The  Partnership Act, s.7 also expressly provides that every partner is an agent of the firm and his other partners for the purpose of the business of the  partnership.

(g) Liability of Members

A company's member is not personally liable for the company's debts because, legally, they are not his debts.

A partner is personally liable for the firm's debts. This rule has been codified by s.11 of the Partnership Act which provides that "every partner in a  firm is liable jointly with the other partners for all debts and obligations of the firm incurred while he is a partner", unless the partner is a limited partner.

Posted Date: 1/12/2013 2:13:44 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Differences between registered companies and partnerships, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Differences between registered companies and partnerships, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Differences between registered companies and partnerships Discussions

Write discussion on Differences between registered companies and partnerships
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

VOIDABLE ALLOTMENTS: An allotment of shares is voidable if it is made in breach of- a)      Section 49 (1): by having been made before the minimum subscription was raised o

Duty of an auditor: The duty of an auditor generally was very carefully considered by this court in RE: LONDON AND GENERAL BANK (1895) and I cannot usefully add anything to wh

State the theory of international antitrust A fourth approach is the allocation of jurisdiction over conduct with multijurisdictional effects to one agency by another agency th

QUESTION 1 What are the consequences of a unilateral modification of a contract of employment of indeterminate duration by an employer? QUESTION 2 (a) In what circumsta

Exceptions for Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet However the "nemo dat" rule is subject for the following exceptions such are provided by the Act: like; (a) Estoppel With S.23

Stare Decisis and Its Application by US Courts However there is so far no case decided through the US Court of Appeal regarding the application of "stare Decisis" through US C

Domestic or Family Agreements - Elements of Contract However there is a rebuttable presumption such the parties did not intend for create legal relations as: 1. Agreements

Determine the implications of the legislature Policy outcomes are the result of legislative bargaining. So policy becomes a compromise between the executive and the legislature

INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAWS The laws controlling and regulating International trade have become one of the fastest growing areas of international law. International trade laws conce