Derivation of indifference curve, Macroeconomics

Derivation of Indifference Curve:

Consider any commodity bundle denoted by point A in the above figure which consist x01 and x02 amount of good I and good II respectively and from which consumer obtains particular level of utility, say U0. We compare the commodity bundle 'A' with other commodity bundle in the commodity space. For that we divide the entire commodity plane into four phases from 'A'.  Consider any point in phase I say β, where we have large quantity of both x1 and x2 compared to point 'A'. Again, if we consider any point say 'a' in horizontal line in phase I, we have larger quantity of x1 with same quantity of x2 compared to point 'A'. Similarly, for any point 'b' in vertical axis, we have larger x2 with same x1. That means in phase I including the borderlines, we have larger quantity of at least one commodity and no less quantity of any other commodity compared to 'A'. Thus, we have larger utility in phase I including the borderlines compared to 'A'. 

 

1565_Derivation of Indifference Curve.png

By similar logic, we have lower consumption of at least one good and no larger consumption of any other good in phase III including the borderlines compared to point 'A'. Hence, we have lower level of utility in phase III including the borderlines compared to 'A' by the axiom of non-satiation for all goods. 

Clearly, in phases I and III, including borderlines, utility is not constant between the commodity bundles compared to point 'A'. So, indifference curve (along which utility is constant) can't pass through phases I and III including their borderlines. 

Consider any point in phase IV excluding borderlines, say α. We have larger x1 (for which utility is larger) and lower x2 (for which utility is lower) compared to 'A'. Since both goods are non-satiated, utility of point α may be larger, lower or equal compared to point 'A'. Similarly, for any point in phase II excluding the borderlines, say  δ, we have larger consumption of x2 but lower of x1 compared to point 'A'. Therefore, by axiom of non-satiation in all goods, utility at point δ may be larger, lower or equal compared to 'A'. 

Clearly, only in phases II and IV excluding the borderlines, there is a possibility of the same level of utility between the bundles compared to point 'A'. So, indifference curve, along which utility remains unchanged, must pass through the phase II and phase IV, excluding their lines. Thus, indifference curve is necessarily downward sloping where all goods are non-satiated given that a consumer choice is continuous, reflexive and complete.  

 

Posted Date: 10/26/2012 2:42:16 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Derivation of indifference curve, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Derivation of indifference curve, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Derivation of indifference curve Discussions

Write discussion on Derivation of indifference curve
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Cd players are produced on an automated assembly line process. The standard cost of CD players is 150.00 per unit. The sales price is $300.00 per unit. To achieve a 10 percent mult

To analyze the effects of discrimination in labor markets, use supply and demand curves for labor, with the demand curves representing the value of the marginal product, show the e

how can a country maintain equilibrium GDP with foreign trade?

For a single nonprofit provider, describe an output-maximizing model to predict supplier behavior?

Analyze the ways in which managers could use the Federal Register to determine the single most significant challenge associated with its use, and how managers could address that ch

The Stop decay company sells an electric toothbrush for $25. Its sales have averaged 8,000 units per month over the past year. Recently, its closest competitor, Decay fighter, redu

Q. Aggregate demand in the IS-LM model? Aggregate demand Aggregate demand depends on Y and R in the IS-LM model As investments depend on R

Potatoes cost Janice $0.50 per pound, and she has $5.00 that she could possibly spend on potatoes or other items. Suppose she feels that the first pound of potatoes is worth $1.50,

Consider Gold-Bernstein's Integration roadmap (p. 18).  Construct two business examples, one that clearly calls for a strategic integration effort and the other that call

Which of the following statements regarding the heckscher-ohlin model and Ricardian trade theory is TRUE? a. Both the Heckscher-Ohlin and Ricardian models are current, relevant,