Defining strictly local automata, Theory of Computation

One of the first issues to resolve, when exploring any mechanism for defining languages is the question of how to go about constructing instances of the mechanism which define particular, given languages. Towards that end, note that a strictly 2-local automaton can require a particular symbol to appear at the beginning or end of the string and it can permit particular pairs of symbols to occur in the interior of the string but, in general, it can't require an arbitrary pair of symbols to occur in the interior of the string. Consider, for example the language:

639_De?ning Strictly Local Automata.png

This is just the set of all strings over {a, b} in which the sequence ‘ab' occurs at least once. Since the string aabaa is in L1, any strictly 2-local automaton will have to include at least the pairs:

fia, aa, ab, ba, afi.

But then the string aaaaa will also be accepted, using just the first two and the last one of these pairs. Roughly, as long as we have to permit other pairs starting with ‘a' we cannot require ‘ab' to occur.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 5:51:00 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Defining strictly local automata, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Defining strictly local automata, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Defining strictly local automata Discussions

Write discussion on Defining strictly local automata
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Computer has a single FIFO queue of ?xed precision unsigned integers with the length of the queue unbounded. You can use access methods similar to those in the third model. In this

Generate 100 random numbers with the exponential distribution lambda=5.0.What is the probability that the largest of them is less than 1.0?

Ask queyystion #Minimum 100 words accepted#

Question 2 (10 pt): In this question we look at an extension to DFAs. A composable-reset DFA (CR-DFA) is a five-tuple, (Q,S,d,q0,F) where: – Q is the set of states, – S is the alph

How useful is production function in production planning?


how to convert a grammar into GNF

Rubber shortnote

Theorem (Myhill-Nerode) A language L ⊆ Σ is recognizable iff ≡L partitions Σ* into ?nitely many Nerode equivalence classes. Proof: For the "only if" direction (that every recogn

All that distinguishes the de?nition of the class of Regular languages from that of the class of Star-Free languages is that the former is closed under Kleene closure while the lat