Decision making regarding treatment vs non-treatment, Business Law and Ethics

In relation to the scenario below, discuss relevant ethical and legal issues that relate to decision making regarding treatment vs non-treatment.  

Please note, you are not being asked to take a particular viewpoint/position here, but rather to discuss key issues relevant to the scenario. This is not a discussion about pathophysiology, nor about euthanasia.

Scenario background:

Mr GB is a 67 year old male with hypertension, chronic renal failure and Type 2 diabetes. He was originally admitted to hospital following a dense cardiovascular accident (CVA or 'stroke') which has left him with unilateral weakness and aphasia (inability to speak). Four weeks later GB now has a non-functioning kidney and to survive, will need haemodialysis three times per week. His family is divided about whether he should undergo such treatment and are unable to reach agreement.

 

Using the ethical principles of beneficence/non-maleficence, discuss issues of treatment vs non-treatment relevant to the above scenario.  You could consider issues such as: 

  • futility of treatment
  • quality of life
  • the decision making process (e.g. competence and consent)
  • the law as it relates to this case study (depending on which state or territoryyou live in).

An exhaustive list of arguments is not required, rather, you should address a fewer number of points in depth.

Your arguments/discussion points should be logical and objective, and address relevant issues. To achieve this, avoid "I feel" or "I believe" statements. This is different to the Journal. Write in the third person using formal academic writing.

Referencing:

  • Your reference list should contain aminimumof eight quality references that are not more than 5-10 years old, unless you can validate the use of older sources.
  • This doesnotinclude Wikipedia or dictionaries.
  • Information gained from Internet sites varies greatly in depth and quality of content. Limit internet sites to no more than one, unless additional references are from reputable, on-line refereed journals

Writing

  • Write in the third person; avoid personal pronouns such as 'I' and 'you'.
  • Avoid long, confusing sentences and check that your tenses (past, present and future) are consistent within the same sentence.
  • Avoid posing questions; these detract from the strengths of your discussion.
  • Use plain English. It is essential you demonstrate that you understand the nature of the topic.
Posted Date: 2/19/2013 12:03:47 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Decision making regarding treatment vs non-treatment, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Decision making regarding treatment vs non-treatment, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Decision making regarding treatment vs non-treatment Discussions

Write discussion on Decision making regarding treatment vs non-treatment
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Describe the principal-agent framework In standard principal-agent framework an agent may be directed to maximize an objective function which may or may not be different from

Judicial Control: Conversely the courts can declare any law made as subsidiary legislation to be invalid or unacceptable under the ultra vires doctrine. Thus the law may be de

Prospectus Issue: Under a prospectus issue the company sells the shares directly to the public rather than selling them through intermediaries.

What are the organisations made up by United Nations? The United Nations was set up to make international public law after the Second World War. This is represented by nearly e

State Article 29 of international law Article 29 states that a member of a diplomatic mission enjoys immunity from arrest or prosecution.

Holder or Other Holder in Due Course The holder of a bill of exchange who that does not come within the statutory definition of such a holder in due course holds that the bill

Ratified - pre-incorporation contract: If the agreement is a written one and it shows that the proposed company was the contracting party the promoters will not be allowed to

STATUTE LAW: There this is an Act of Parliament.  Whether this is law made through parliament directly in exercise of legislative power conferred upon it through the constitut

Separate meetings of each group - mergers and winding up: The first ground of objection was valid, ie. if within a single class of shareholders there are groups whose inte

Q. Publication of list of repeat offenders ? As a part of the joint education campaign option, or separate to the education campaign, a ‘naming and shaming' approach could also