Current vs. historical costs, Business Economics

Accountants prepare income statements typically in terms of historical costs, in terms of the purchase price, rather than in terms of the current price. The reasons given for this practice are:

1.    Historical costs produce more accurate measurement of the income.

2.    Historical costs are less debatable and more objective than the calculated present replacement value, and

3.    Accountants' job is to record historical costs whether or not they may have relevance for further decision making. The accountants approach ignores certain important changes in earning and losses of the firms, (1) the value of assets presented in the books of accounts is understand in times of inflation and overstated at the time of the deflection, depreciation is understand during deflection. Historical cost recording does not reflect such changes in values of assets and profits. This problem assumes a critical importance in case of the inventories and stock. The problem is how to evaluate the inventory and the goods in the pipeline. There are three common techniques of inventory valuation: (1) first in first out (FIFO), (2) last in first out (LIFO), and (3) weighted average cost (WAC). Under FIFO method, material is taken out of the stock for further processing in the order in which they are acquired. The stocks, therefore appear in the firms balance sheet at their actual cost price. This method is suitable when price has a secular trend. However, this system exaggerates profits at the time of rising prices. The LIFO method assumes that stocks purchased most recently become the costs of the raw material in the current production. If inventory levels are stable the cost of the raw materials used at any point in the calculation of profits is always close to market or replacement value. But when inventory levels fluctuate this method loses its advantages. The WAC method takes the weighted average of the costs of materials purchased at different prices and different points of time to evaluate the inventory. All these methods have their own weaknesses and do not reflect the true profit of business. So the problem of evaluating inventories so as to yield a true profit figure remains there.

Posted Date: 8/4/2012 7:46:02 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Current vs. historical costs, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Current vs. historical costs, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Current vs. historical costs Discussions

Write discussion on Current vs. historical costs
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Question 1 ‘The consumer is always king in the market place'. Critically examine this statement, highlighting the existence of market imperfections. Question 2 (a) Dis

How can trade agreements assist development? A trade agreement is while two or more countries to by decrease or abolish tariffs, non-trade and quotas barriers which are establ

An underwriter guarantees to increase a fixed amount of capital through an initial public offering (IPO).

#question.During the 1990s, technological advance reduced the cost of computer chips. Explain, with the use supply and demand diagrams, how the following markets are affected in t

Assume the firms cost function is: C(Q)= 100+10Q+Q^2 , Determine whether this industry is a natural monopoly when the demand function is: 1) D(P)= 100-3P 2) D(P)= 90-3P 3) D(P)= 10

The word double-dip is a negative -situation .This scenario has economically shall move back and switch in to a deeper and longer worse situation. A double dip recession states to

A manufacturing company has determined from an analysis of its accounting and production data for a certain part that : a. Its demand is 9000 units per annum and is uniform

you are appointed secretary of the treasury of recently indepent country called rugaria

What is the main danger in placing countries together in the same grouping? It is useful to classify countries by groupings for identification of common problems and policy pu

different types of firms