Current vs. historical costs, Business Economics

Accountants prepare income statements typically in terms of historical costs, in terms of the purchase price, rather than in terms of the current price. The reasons given for this practice are:

1.    Historical costs produce more accurate measurement of the income.

2.    Historical costs are less debatable and more objective than the calculated present replacement value, and

3.    Accountants' job is to record historical costs whether or not they may have relevance for further decision making. The accountants approach ignores certain important changes in earning and losses of the firms, (1) the value of assets presented in the books of accounts is understand in times of inflation and overstated at the time of the deflection, depreciation is understand during deflection. Historical cost recording does not reflect such changes in values of assets and profits. This problem assumes a critical importance in case of the inventories and stock. The problem is how to evaluate the inventory and the goods in the pipeline. There are three common techniques of inventory valuation: (1) first in first out (FIFO), (2) last in first out (LIFO), and (3) weighted average cost (WAC). Under FIFO method, material is taken out of the stock for further processing in the order in which they are acquired. The stocks, therefore appear in the firms balance sheet at their actual cost price. This method is suitable when price has a secular trend. However, this system exaggerates profits at the time of rising prices. The LIFO method assumes that stocks purchased most recently become the costs of the raw material in the current production. If inventory levels are stable the cost of the raw materials used at any point in the calculation of profits is always close to market or replacement value. But when inventory levels fluctuate this method loses its advantages. The WAC method takes the weighted average of the costs of materials purchased at different prices and different points of time to evaluate the inventory. All these methods have their own weaknesses and do not reflect the true profit of business. So the problem of evaluating inventories so as to yield a true profit figure remains there.

Posted Date: 8/4/2012 7:46:02 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Current vs. historical costs, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Current vs. historical costs, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Current vs. historical costs Discussions

Write discussion on Current vs. historical costs
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
is indian companies running a risk by not giving attention to cost cutting?

PRICE ED OF DOVE SOAP IS GRATER THAN BATHING SOAP IN GENERAL.. GIVE REASON. AN WHAT U ANALYIS

I thought I was getting an automatic answer

Distribution of benefits for transferring drivers to transit during a congested morning commute A residential suburb has N = 30,000 commuters who drive alone to jobs in a cen

What is the success effectiveness of multi-national companies (transnationals) in the promotion of development? TNC FDI success into promoting development: • Introduces mode

Evaluation of perfect competition arguing the effect on stakeholders, priorities and SR/LR

Explain about the characteristics required in a risk owner. To be effective within their role, a risk owner’ requirements are as follows: a. Adequate information regarding a

Growth in Private Capital Flows is explained below: There has been a extraordinary growth in private capital flows since the 1990s. For instance, the value of capital flow tran

How do we identify if an institution or development policy works? Institutions and policies have goals. Successful policies and institutions meet stated objectives in a specif