Current vs. historical costs, Business Economics

Accountants prepare income statements typically in terms of historical costs, in terms of the purchase price, rather than in terms of the current price. The reasons given for this practice are:

1.    Historical costs produce more accurate measurement of the income.

2.    Historical costs are less debatable and more objective than the calculated present replacement value, and

3.    Accountants' job is to record historical costs whether or not they may have relevance for further decision making. The accountants approach ignores certain important changes in earning and losses of the firms, (1) the value of assets presented in the books of accounts is understand in times of inflation and overstated at the time of the deflection, depreciation is understand during deflection. Historical cost recording does not reflect such changes in values of assets and profits. This problem assumes a critical importance in case of the inventories and stock. The problem is how to evaluate the inventory and the goods in the pipeline. There are three common techniques of inventory valuation: (1) first in first out (FIFO), (2) last in first out (LIFO), and (3) weighted average cost (WAC). Under FIFO method, material is taken out of the stock for further processing in the order in which they are acquired. The stocks, therefore appear in the firms balance sheet at their actual cost price. This method is suitable when price has a secular trend. However, this system exaggerates profits at the time of rising prices. The LIFO method assumes that stocks purchased most recently become the costs of the raw material in the current production. If inventory levels are stable the cost of the raw materials used at any point in the calculation of profits is always close to market or replacement value. But when inventory levels fluctuate this method loses its advantages. The WAC method takes the weighted average of the costs of materials purchased at different prices and different points of time to evaluate the inventory. All these methods have their own weaknesses and do not reflect the true profit of business. So the problem of evaluating inventories so as to yield a true profit figure remains there.

Posted Date: 8/4/2012 7:46:02 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Current vs. historical costs, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Current vs. historical costs, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Current vs. historical costs Discussions

Write discussion on Current vs. historical costs
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
What are factor endowment implications? Implications of factor endowment: • Less Developed Countries to specialise and export labour intensive goods, agriculture or commodit

QUESTION (a) Analyse the activist and non-activist policy makers' choice between implementing a policy rule or a discretionary monetary policy. (b) Explain why the policy ru

EXPLAIN WHY INTERDEPENDENCE IN OLIGOPOLY RESULTS IN A TENSION BETWEEN COOPERATION AND COMPETITION.

The Wallpaper Shop, Inc., is a rapidly growing chain of wallpaper shops that caters to the do-it-yourself home remodeling market. During the past year, 15 stores were operated in s

Calculate point elasticity of demand for demand function Q=10-2p for decrease in price from Rs 3 to Rs 2

How did foreign debt arise? Evaluation: Borrowing shows an injection of new resources in the domestic economy and also an opportunity for development. • When borrowed re

How is supply related to opportunity cost?

Analyse the effectiveness of market approaches into promoting development. Assessing the effectiveness of some system, planned, market or mixed depends onto the choice of displ

Can national income figures be used to make comparisons of standard of living among countries? National income measures the Gross Domestic Product of country and therefore can

Are the terms of trade (ToT) a problem? Problem : The terms of trade (ToT) of a country fall when its import prices rise quicker than the price of its exports. Less Developed