Critique of cost-benefit studies, Microeconomics

Critique of Cost-Benefit Studies

Numerous criticisms have been levelled against the approach of cost benefit studies. Many of these criticisms are centred on the assumptions underlying the cost benefit studies. For instance, assumption about the average span of working life in life time returns will vary from researcher to researcher. Some of the researchers do not take waiting time for employment into account or underestimate the same. Further, job in life need not be tied to the qualification of a person. Sometimes women are not considered for certain jobs even though they have the requisite qualifications.

Promotions within a career need not be based on additional qualifications or merit. There has been a long standing debate on the role of intelligence in success in life. Intelligence, defined as native ability, an inborn potential that is inherited from one’s parentage is considered as crucial for achievement and success in life. The environmentalists reason out that intelligence is a social construct. It has no meaning when it is divorced from social life. It is fashioned by the vicarious and rich quality of the social milieu in which one lives. The level of development of a society is dependent upon the levels to which a person’s abilities can blossom. Education, whether it is formal or informal or non formal, is one of these social determinants. Believers in inherited abilities discount the value of education in life time earnings. They consider that to a large extent the success of a person in a career or self employment or business or trade depends on his intelligence which is an inborn potential. Intelligence or innate abilities of a person, his personality structure, styles of work etc. may influence his chances of getting better jobs, promotions and higher earnings.


Keeping in view all these objections to the computation of returns wherein qualifications are given status as causal variables for life time earnings of a person, researchers in the area of cost benefit studies generally allow a correction factor, by way of a coefficient (or a constant), to take care of contributions to life time earnings from all the extraneous variables. The per centage of allowance credited to these variables ranges from 20 to 30 in studies on estimates of returns.

 

Posted Date: 12/17/2012 5:14:24 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Critique of cost-benefit studies, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Critique of cost-benefit studies, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Critique of cost-benefit studies Discussions

Write discussion on Critique of cost-benefit studies
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

Implications of Williams model of managerial discretion in Nepalese industries

Modern economy: It explored the role of money in every modern economy.The chapter also revealed that it is necessary for the government to ensure consistency between the quant

Why does a price index based on constant weights tend to overstate inflation in periods after the base year when the price of one good is rising quickly compared to other goods?

Mercantilism:It is an economic theory from pre-capitalist times which held that a country's prosperity depended on its ability to produce large and persistent surpluses in its fore

How might one assess if a country in experiencing both growth and development? This is a matter of explaining clearly both growth and development; growth is an enhance in GDP (

FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR POLICY FAILURES: It is the subject of many official and academic studies to try and find out the reasons for the inability of many, in fact, most of th

Which of the following statements is correct? a. Consumers have the ability to buy everything they desire. b. A consumer''s budget line shows the limits to what a consumer can buy.

Development Banks Banks that function as coordinating and intermediary industries to raise capital attract investment, and giving technical assistance for the economic develop