Critique of cost-benefit studies, Microeconomics

Critique of Cost-Benefit Studies

Numerous criticisms have been levelled against the approach of cost benefit studies. Many of these criticisms are centred on the assumptions underlying the cost benefit studies. For instance, assumption about the average span of working life in life time returns will vary from researcher to researcher. Some of the researchers do not take waiting time for employment into account or underestimate the same. Further, job in life need not be tied to the qualification of a person. Sometimes women are not considered for certain jobs even though they have the requisite qualifications.

Promotions within a career need not be based on additional qualifications or merit. There has been a long standing debate on the role of intelligence in success in life. Intelligence, defined as native ability, an inborn potential that is inherited from one’s parentage is considered as crucial for achievement and success in life. The environmentalists reason out that intelligence is a social construct. It has no meaning when it is divorced from social life. It is fashioned by the vicarious and rich quality of the social milieu in which one lives. The level of development of a society is dependent upon the levels to which a person’s abilities can blossom. Education, whether it is formal or informal or non formal, is one of these social determinants. Believers in inherited abilities discount the value of education in life time earnings. They consider that to a large extent the success of a person in a career or self employment or business or trade depends on his intelligence which is an inborn potential. Intelligence or innate abilities of a person, his personality structure, styles of work etc. may influence his chances of getting better jobs, promotions and higher earnings.


Keeping in view all these objections to the computation of returns wherein qualifications are given status as causal variables for life time earnings of a person, researchers in the area of cost benefit studies generally allow a correction factor, by way of a coefficient (or a constant), to take care of contributions to life time earnings from all the extraneous variables. The per centage of allowance credited to these variables ranges from 20 to 30 in studies on estimates of returns.

 

Posted Date: 12/17/2012 5:14:24 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Critique of cost-benefit studies, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Critique of cost-benefit studies, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Critique of cost-benefit studies Discussions

Write discussion on Critique of cost-benefit studies
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Income Elasticity of Demand is described below: Income elasticity of demand is the percentage change in the quantity demanded/required with respect to the percentage change in

The Money Multiplier is explained below: If you see carefully, the money multiplier is nothing but an inverse of a reserve ratio. Therefore, we can write MM = 1/rr, where rr is

What are the three major types of unemployment?   a) Frictional b) Structural and c) Cyclical unemployment. Cyclical unemployment is broadly spread by an economy durin

(a) Reasons of Urban Growth (b) Characteristics of Urban Growth (c) Economic Life of a Building (d) Zone of Transition (e) Location Theory (f) Patterns of Growth Theory (g) Growth

How would you convert from moles of iron(III) oxide to moles of carbon monoxide?

Participation Rate:Proportion of working-age individuals who decide to ‘participate' in the labour force, by either being employed or actively seeking work. Precise definition of w

Individual Assignment ECO101 - PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS electronic submission via Moodle 6 Questions 100 marks (15% of total course) All questions should be attempted. 30-50 w

Q. Describe Classical Economics? Classical Economics:Tradition of economics which began with Adam Smith and continued with other theorists including Thomas Malthus, David Ricar

negative slope on ppf represents what?

What is micro static analysis?