Criticism against hechscher-ohlin type trade theories, International Economics

Criticism against Hechscher-Ohlin type trade theories is explained below:

The foremost criticism leveled against Hechscher-Ohlin type trade theories are that they views comparative advantage in the essentially static sense; that is if Pakistan is better at producing cotton and Japan better is at producing, then this situation will always exist. Critics argued that the comparative advantage can and should be viewed in a dynamic (time-varying) sense, and that it was not wise at all to rule out the possibility of Pakistan developing comparative advantage in cars in future.

Of course,  the  policy  advice  of  such  dynamic  comparative advantage theorists  was  very different from the above 6. These people argued that the countries build comparative advantage in the capital-intensive goods by protecting their domestic industries against the cheap industry manufactured imports from abroad. The protection is operationalised through tariffs which mean tax on imports or the outright quota restrictions. The output from the local infant industries then is used to substitute the imports of the manufactures. Various LICs (such as Mexico, India) consistently followed this policy prescription in the mid-20th century, but with the mixed results.

While it is true that number of countries pursued, fully or partly, the policy prescription suggested by the dynamic comparative advantage theories, only some of them were genuinely successful in changing their comparative advantage: Korea developed its comparative advantage in the auto industry, Malaysia in shipbuilding and consumer electronics, Taiwan in microchips, Brazil in light aircraft. Of these, most of the countries (like the East Asian tigers) had the marked export orientation in their industrialization and trade policies. This is what keeps them apart from the failures, which had a much more import-substituting approach to the industrialization..

Posted Date: 7/19/2012 4:17:32 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Criticism against hechscher-ohlin type trade theories, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Criticism against hechscher-ohlin type trade theories, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Criticism against hechscher-ohlin type trade theories Discussions

Write discussion on Criticism against hechscher-ohlin type trade theories
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
suppose that France has a trade surplus with the united kingdom, what would you expect to happen to price,wages, and commodity price in France? why? what would happen to the terms

Q. Explain the purpose of the following figure. Show the effects of German unification on Germany's interest rate. Answer: The major purpose is to show that different i

Q. Explain why the distinction between debt and equity finance is useful in analyzing the response of developing countries to unforeseen events such as recession or terms of trade

Explain about International economic integration. EU

Q. Now, consider that the relative price of A is actually not higher than Albania's autarkic level of 1, but quite the opposite (e.g. PA/PB = 0.5). Could Albania still be able t

What exactly is IMF and why is it so important in helping Europe? How exactly does it help Europe and what effects does its help have on rest of the world?

if the US dollar depreciates dramatically relative to the Chinese yuan, what effect would this have on consumers and businesses in each country? When is a falling dollar good or ba


Describe the important benefits enjoyed by indian companies through TRIPs. Elaborate the main objective of WTO in global ecomommy

Q. What do you think about international? Answer: A prescribed procedure whereby a country is able to seek international legal authorization to temporarily stop paying i