Criticism against hechscher-ohlin type trade theories, International Economics

Criticism against Hechscher-Ohlin type trade theories is explained below:

The foremost criticism leveled against Hechscher-Ohlin type trade theories are that they views comparative advantage in the essentially static sense; that is if Pakistan is better at producing cotton and Japan better is at producing, then this situation will always exist. Critics argued that the comparative advantage can and should be viewed in a dynamic (time-varying) sense, and that it was not wise at all to rule out the possibility of Pakistan developing comparative advantage in cars in future.

Of course,  the  policy  advice  of  such  dynamic  comparative advantage theorists  was  very different from the above 6. These people argued that the countries build comparative advantage in the capital-intensive goods by protecting their domestic industries against the cheap industry manufactured imports from abroad. The protection is operationalised through tariffs which mean tax on imports or the outright quota restrictions. The output from the local infant industries then is used to substitute the imports of the manufactures. Various LICs (such as Mexico, India) consistently followed this policy prescription in the mid-20th century, but with the mixed results.

While it is true that number of countries pursued, fully or partly, the policy prescription suggested by the dynamic comparative advantage theories, only some of them were genuinely successful in changing their comparative advantage: Korea developed its comparative advantage in the auto industry, Malaysia in shipbuilding and consumer electronics, Taiwan in microchips, Brazil in light aircraft. Of these, most of the countries (like the East Asian tigers) had the marked export orientation in their industrialization and trade policies. This is what keeps them apart from the failures, which had a much more import-substituting approach to the industrialization..

Posted Date: 7/19/2012 4:17:32 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Criticism against hechscher-ohlin type trade theories, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Criticism against hechscher-ohlin type trade theories, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Criticism against hechscher-ohlin type trade theories Discussions

Write discussion on Criticism against hechscher-ohlin type trade theories
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
What can explain the failure of relative PPP to hold in reality? Answer: Government procedures of the price level differ from country to country. One cause for these differe

Q. What are the factors affecting the demand for foreign currency? Answer: Three factors that affect the demand for foreign currency are risk, expected return, and liquidity.



organistion and style of writing the research report

Q. Using 4 different figures, plot the time paths showing the effects of a permanent increase in the United States money supply on: A. U.S. money supply. B.

Assess the supply and demand of international reserves. Discuss the major determinants of the demand for international reserves: 1.) the monetary value of international transaction

Q. Illustrate the reasons for the economic "miracle" of the East Asian countries between 1960 and 1997. Is it only due to the common Asian practice of industrial policy and busin

i need to do term paper international economics related. the paper have to be empirical paper. Writing an Empirical Paper in APA Style 1- Title Page 2- Abstract 3- Introduction 4-

Q. Explain why the European Union's current combination of rapid capital migration with limited labor migration may actually raise the cost of adjusting to product market shocks wi