Criticism against hechscher-ohlin type trade theories, International Economics

Criticism against Hechscher-Ohlin type trade theories is explained below:

The foremost criticism leveled against Hechscher-Ohlin type trade theories are that they views comparative advantage in the essentially static sense; that is if Pakistan is better at producing cotton and Japan better is at producing, then this situation will always exist. Critics argued that the comparative advantage can and should be viewed in a dynamic (time-varying) sense, and that it was not wise at all to rule out the possibility of Pakistan developing comparative advantage in cars in future.

Of course,  the  policy  advice  of  such  dynamic  comparative advantage theorists  was  very different from the above 6. These people argued that the countries build comparative advantage in the capital-intensive goods by protecting their domestic industries against the cheap industry manufactured imports from abroad. The protection is operationalised through tariffs which mean tax on imports or the outright quota restrictions. The output from the local infant industries then is used to substitute the imports of the manufactures. Various LICs (such as Mexico, India) consistently followed this policy prescription in the mid-20th century, but with the mixed results.

While it is true that number of countries pursued, fully or partly, the policy prescription suggested by the dynamic comparative advantage theories, only some of them were genuinely successful in changing their comparative advantage: Korea developed its comparative advantage in the auto industry, Malaysia in shipbuilding and consumer electronics, Taiwan in microchips, Brazil in light aircraft. Of these, most of the countries (like the East Asian tigers) had the marked export orientation in their industrialization and trade policies. This is what keeps them apart from the failures, which had a much more import-substituting approach to the industrialization..

Posted Date: 7/19/2012 4:17:32 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Criticism against hechscher-ohlin type trade theories, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Criticism against hechscher-ohlin type trade theories, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Criticism against hechscher-ohlin type trade theories Discussions

Write discussion on Criticism against hechscher-ohlin type trade theories
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions

Question: (a) Illustrate the differences between inter and intra industry trade. (b) Foreign Investors generally tend to adopt a two-stage process when evaluating count

Critical evaluation of Adam Smith''s Theory. Outline of its purest form. What is its critism?

Why would interest rate parity hold better than Purchasing power parity overtime?

Development through stabilisation and reform can be understood as follows     The reasoning here was that the trade and resource transfer could not, by themselves, lift L

wate is the national incom of indi aims & objectives

Q. Discuss the differences between Absolute PPP and Relative PPP. Answer: Absolute Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) states that the exchange rate between two currencies e

Q. "It is in the interest of each depositor to withdraw her money from a bank if all other depositors are doing the same, even when the bank's assets are sound." Discuss. As par

discuss the superiority of haberler''s theory of opportuinity cost over mill''s theory reciprocal demand?

Q. Using 4 different figures, plot the time paths showing the effects of a permanent increase in the United States money supply on: A. U.S. money supply. B.