Cost minimizing input choice, Microeconomics

The Cost Minimizing Input Choice

- Assumptions

  • Two Inputs: Labor (L) & capital (K)
  • Price of labor: wage rate (w)
  • The capital price

- R = depreciation rate + interest rate

- Question

  • If capital was rented, would it change the value of r?

* The Isocost Line

- C = wL + rK

- Isocost: A line which shows all the combinations of L & K which can be purchased for same cost

- Rewriting C as linear:

  • K = C/r - (w/r)L
  • Slope of the Isocost:

                  1222_isocost.png

is the ratio of wage rate to rental cost of capital.

* This shows the rate at which capital can be substituted for labor with no change in cost.

Posted Date: 10/12/2012 2:54:46 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Cost minimizing input choice, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Cost minimizing input choice, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Cost minimizing input choice Discussions

Write discussion on Cost minimizing input choice
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
why does the quantity of salt tend to be unresponsive to changes in its price


What are the basic analytical frameworks of modern economics? The fundamental analytical framework of modern economics: The fundamental analytical framework for an econom

DIMENSIONS OF UNEMPLOYMENT: What is the level of unemployment in the country? According to the 1999-2000 Survey of NSSO, the number of unemployed has increased from 20.13 mill

compare marginal rate of technical substitution and marginal rate of substitution

A spherical wave is reflected from a planar mirror sufficiently far from the wave origin so that the Fresnel approximation is satisfied. By regarding the spherical wave locally as

Use a graphical illustration to describe briefly what the influence of each of the following would be on the market supply of labor:(a) an increase in immigration (b) more women en

Performance of Public Sector Enterprises: Data reveal that the performance of the much-maligned public enterprises has shown a distinct improvement during the last 9 years. Gr

1. The figure below is historical production data from the Kuparuk River field. The OOIP is 5,332,979 Mstb and cumulative recovery through 12/31/2004 is 1,971,200,654 stb.

Suppose there are two countries (home and foreign) and that two goods can be produced within those countries: machinery (M) and bread (B). Marginal product of labor (MPL) is given