Contracts illegal at the common law, Business Law and Ethics

Contracts illegal at the common law

However a contract which is prohibited through the common law is frequently described as being as "contrary to public policy" as i.e. the court is of the view like it is in the public interest such the contract should not be enforced.  Whether such a contract may be one that as:

1. Tends to promote corruption during the public service, as demonstrated through Parkinson v. College of Ambulance Ltd. (1925),

2. Tends to promote sexual immorality that as in Pearce v. Brooks (1866)

3. Tends to interfere with the sanctity of marriage that then as Wilson v. Carnley (1908). Conversely, in Fender v. St. John - Mildmay (1938) the House of Lords held such a contract made between decree nisi and decree absolute, to marriage after the dissolution of the existing marriage is legitimate as despite the fact like it rendered reconciliation between parties for the divorce proceedings approximately impossible.

4. Tends to fetter the freedom of marriage.

5. Tends to prejudice the administration of justice that as follow:

  • Champerty: therein Trendex Trading Corporation v. Credit Suisse (1982),
  • Maintenance

 

6. Which is tends to prejudice the administration of justice.

  • Champerty agreement
  • Maintenance: Trendex Trading Co-or-operation v Credit suise.
Posted Date: 1/22/2013 4:15:20 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Contracts illegal at the common law, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Contracts illegal at the common law, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Contracts illegal at the common law Discussions

Write discussion on Contracts illegal at the common law
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
A landowner has a duty to protect a person that enters his/her property from injury.  If the person is a guest or licensee, then it is a higher duty of care.  However, the landowne

What is the difference between the plain meaning and the liberal approaches to the interpretation of contracts? Provide me with an example of each to show me you understand the dif

QUESTION 1 The doctrine laid down in Salomon v Salomon & Co. Ltd has to be watched very carefully. The Courts can and often do draw aside the veil. Discuss QUESTION 2 (

Rules Relating to an Offer - Law of Contract However the case law relating to an offer has established the following rules: 1. Such offer may be oral plus written or may be

Fraudulent Preference: Under s.312, any disposition of the company's property and any creation of a charge, fixed or floating, effected during the period of six months before

Patrick works in the same office as Marian and they do not work well together. One day, Marian got credit for a job well done and Patrick got angry over it. He walked int

Types of Authority - Agency Law Further there are three types of authority namely like:; (a) Real or factual However this is the authority that in fact is given to the

Mr. Hellerstein is a professor at Tahoe Law School located in Tahoe California. He lives in Nevada and commutes to Tahoe Law School, which is only a 50-mile, commute one way.  Duri

Common law rule - meetings and resolutions: The common law rule applies irrespective of whether the failure to give notice of the meeting was deliberate or unintentional.  How

Termination of Arbitral Proceeding Although the Arbitral proceedings may be terminated in any of the giving ways as; Through the final award of the arbitrator Whether