Consideration must move from the promise - law of contract, Business Law and Ethics

Consideration must move from the promise - Law of Contract

Conversely the rule that "consideration must move from the promisee" means such only a person who has personally given consideration to a promise can sue for breach to the promise.  Well a person who has not given consideration about a promise cannot sue the promisor with the simple reason such he cannot expect to get something for nothing. Hence the common law regards a contract like a bargain between the parties to a commercial transaction thus each of whom has bought the promise to the other with his own promise or like act. 

Actually this is illustrated through the case of Dunlop v Selfridge in whereas the appellants were motor tyre manufacturers and sold tyres to Messrs Dew & Co. That who were motor accessory dealers.  Hence under the terms of the contract Dew & Co. agreed not to sell the tyres below the Dunlop's list prices, and as the Dunlop's agents, to obtain from other retailers a related undertaking.  Well in return for this undertaking Dew & Co. were to obtain discounts, some of that they could pass on to retailers who bought tyres.  But Selfridge & Co. accepted two orders from customers to Dunlop covers at a lower price.  Whether they obtained the covers through Dew & Co. and signed an agreement just not to sell or offer the tyres below list price. 

Further it was further agreed that by £5 per tyre so sold should be paid to Dunlop through way of liquidated damages.  Through Selfridge's supplied one of the two tyres ordered below list price.  Though they did not actually supply the other, although informed the customer such they could only supply it at list price.  Well the appellants claimed an injunction and damages against the respondents to breach of the agreement completed with Dew & Co., claiming such Dew & Co. were their agents in the matter. Actually it was held that there was no contract made between the parties.  Thus Dunlop could not enforce the contract made between the respondents and Dew & Co. since they had not supplied the consideration.  Smooth if Dunlop were undisclosed principals, such there was no consideration moving between them and the respondents.  Moreover The discount received through Selfridge was part of that given through Dunlop to Dew & Co. since Dew & Co. were not bound to confer any part of their discount for retailers the discount received through Selfridge operated only like consideration between themselves and Dew & Co. and could not be claimed through Dunlop as consideration to support a promise not for sell below list price.

Posted Date: 1/22/2013 3:00:28 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Consideration must move from the promise - law of contract, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Consideration must move from the promise - law of contract, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Consideration must move from the promise - law of contract Discussions

Write discussion on Consideration must move from the promise - law of contract
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Express and Implied terms of contract Express terms However the terms of a contract are said to like "express terms" whether the parties themselves adverted to them on

MSc Finance and Management 2012-13 Ethics in Finance Ethics in Finance, Assessment Answer ALL THREE questions. This should be your own unaided work (this is an ethics assessmen

Powers and Duties:  The powers and duties of the secretary depend on the size and nature of the company and the personal contractual arrangements that it makes with him. Howev

What are types of segments required for decision? A judge’s decision is made up of two segments, which are given below: a. Obiter dicta: Things said through the way on

The MV unfortunate was talking passengers to Lyme Cay when it receive a distress signal from a vessel nearby the master started to proceed towards the vessel but stop when he reali

I am  Lauren Garcia, I have an order my assignment, please answer me back here Describe what parts of business law are involved in the following scenario. What issues are invo

England Judicial System Moreover the current England judicial system is prearranged in the form of a pyramid, along with the Court of Appeal at the apex there the High Court i

QUESTION 1 The Financial Services Commission (FSC) is the licensing authority for businesses operating in the Global Business sector. By referring to the Global Business Catego

Method of Service: Article 131 provides that a notice may be given by the company to any member either personally or by sending it by post to him at his registered address or

Every person is having different set of knowledge and skill with them which is different from other individual, this difference in skill and knowledge factor among various individu