Comparison between marginal and absorption costing, Cost Accounting

Comparison between Marginal Costing and Absorption Costing

There are accountants who favour all costing method.

Arguments in favour about absorption costing are specified as:

  1. To make output fixed production costs are incurred; consequently it is 'fair' to charge all output along with a share of these costs.
  2. Closing stock values via involving a share of fixed production overhead will be valued on the principle required for the financial accounting valuation of stocks via Standard accounting practice' statement on stocks and long-term contracts as SSAP 9.
  3. A problem along with calculating the contribution of various products made via a company is such it may not be clear whether the contribution earned via each product is sufficient to cover fixed costs, whereas via charging fixed overhead to a product it is probable to ascertain if it is profitable or not.

Arguments in favour about marginal costing are specified as:

  1. It is easy to operate
  2. There are no apportionments that are frequently done on the arbitrary basis, of fixed costs. Many costs, as like the managing director's salary, are indivisible along with nature.
  3. Fixed costs will be the similar regardless of the volume of output, since they are period costs. It makes as hence, to charge them in full like a cost to the period.
  4. The cost to make an extra unit is the variable production cost. It is realistic to value closing stock items at its directly attributable cost.
  5. Beneath or over absorption of overheads is avoided.
  6. Marginal costing information can be required for decision-making however absorption costing information is not appropriate for decision-making.
  7. Fixed costs as like depreciation, rent and salaries concern to a period of time and must be charged against the revenues of the period whether they are incurred.

Obviously, the choice of method does not have to be between marginal costing and absorption costing. Now we looked at ABC like an alternative to absorption costing.  Attributable contribution costing is one more alternative. This includes attributing certain fixed costs to the activities that cause them and then utilizing marginal costing to compute a contribution for every activity, the surplus of contribution over attributable fixed costs being known like attributable contribution.

Posted Date: 2/7/2013 12:13:54 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Comparison between marginal and absorption costing, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Comparison between marginal and absorption costing, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Comparison between marginal and absorption costing Discussions

Write discussion on Comparison between marginal and absorption costing
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
The follow data relates ot year 20XX for Plano Manufacturing Company: Units produced - 2,000 Units sold - 1,800 Selling price - $200 / per unit Direct material costs - $80,000 Dir

1. The following three one-year "discount" loans are available toyou: Loan A: $120,000 at a 7 percent discount rate Loan B: $110,000 at a 6 percent discount rate Loan

Determine the Incremental Cost A company currently makes a component that has the given unit cost structure Direct Material Shs. 100

Wayne Company's beginning and ending inventories for the month of June were as follows: June 1 June 30 Work in progress $145,000 171,000 Finished Goods 85,000 78,000 Production

Usefulness of Variance Analysis Carefully note that while prices are being charged to production, it can be done at the actual or standard price. For purposes of making varian

Business Management Business Management includes planning and staffing, organizing, directing and controlling an organization's activities so like to meet a specified objectiv

Changes in Variable Cost and Selling Price per Unit The contribution sales ratio is affected by any change in variable cost or selling price per unit. This ratio is a mea

You want to save $40,000 for a down payment on a new home. You expect to save $7,000 per year, be in the 25% tax bracket and hope to earn 4% on your investments. How long (in mon

The following information pertains to Tudor Logistics Company: 200X Information: Sales                                      $4,875,000 Selling expense

Cost Account Ledger System A cost account ledger system is essential to analyze accounting information in order such costs may be accumulated for individual cost centers and c