Comparison between marginal and absorption costing, Cost Accounting

Comparison between Marginal Costing and Absorption Costing

There are accountants who favour all costing method.

Arguments in favour about absorption costing are specified as:

  1. To make output fixed production costs are incurred; consequently it is 'fair' to charge all output along with a share of these costs.
  2. Closing stock values via involving a share of fixed production overhead will be valued on the principle required for the financial accounting valuation of stocks via Standard accounting practice' statement on stocks and long-term contracts as SSAP 9.
  3. A problem along with calculating the contribution of various products made via a company is such it may not be clear whether the contribution earned via each product is sufficient to cover fixed costs, whereas via charging fixed overhead to a product it is probable to ascertain if it is profitable or not.

Arguments in favour about marginal costing are specified as:

  1. It is easy to operate
  2. There are no apportionments that are frequently done on the arbitrary basis, of fixed costs. Many costs, as like the managing director's salary, are indivisible along with nature.
  3. Fixed costs will be the similar regardless of the volume of output, since they are period costs. It makes as hence, to charge them in full like a cost to the period.
  4. The cost to make an extra unit is the variable production cost. It is realistic to value closing stock items at its directly attributable cost.
  5. Beneath or over absorption of overheads is avoided.
  6. Marginal costing information can be required for decision-making however absorption costing information is not appropriate for decision-making.
  7. Fixed costs as like depreciation, rent and salaries concern to a period of time and must be charged against the revenues of the period whether they are incurred.

Obviously, the choice of method does not have to be between marginal costing and absorption costing. Now we looked at ABC like an alternative to absorption costing.  Attributable contribution costing is one more alternative. This includes attributing certain fixed costs to the activities that cause them and then utilizing marginal costing to compute a contribution for every activity, the surplus of contribution over attributable fixed costs being known like attributable contribution.

Posted Date: 2/7/2013 12:13:54 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Comparison between marginal and absorption costing, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Comparison between marginal and absorption costing, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Comparison between marginal and absorption costing Discussions

Write discussion on Comparison between marginal and absorption costing
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Assume your grandparents have just given you $20,000 on the condition that you invest the money in the stock market. As you contemplate making your investment choices, what accoun

Xander Harris is considering whether to buy a corn and soybean farm in Iowa. The farm will cost $800,000, and Xander will be able to pay this from profits his recently deceased mot

Ass ume that during April, the job cost sheet for Job 206 showed the following:                                                          Dept. A                   Dept. B M

A listed entity, had 3,000,000 $1 ordinary shares in issue, On 1 January 2009 CSA.CSA made a bonus issue of 1 for 3, On 1 May 2009. CSA issued 2,000,000 $1 ordinary shares for $3.2

The Bloomington Electric Company operates in a stable industry and therefore has predictable dividend growth of 8% per year. The most recent annual dividend was paid yesterday in t

Consider as Illustration. Profit and loss account of TIL demonstrates, that, operations have given gross addition of Rs. 360 million to funds throughout the period. These funds sho

Unrecaptured Sec. 1250 Gain and 1231. Mr. Briggs purchased an apartment complex on January 10, 2011, for $2 million with 10% of the price allocated to land. He sells the complex on

Estimate the manufacturing cost for a bearing housing following the Formula Student Costing Scheme.  Dimensions and materials of the bearing housing will depend on your student

1.  Prepare a cash flow forecast for the proposal to launch SafeCus in 2010 for a three-year period from 1 January 2010 using the data in the body of the Case Study and discount at

Now assume that it is possible to distinguish consumer types one and two and there are no consumers of type three and the firm can charge a two part tariff. What would the optimal