Comparison between marginal and absorption costing, Cost Accounting

Comparison between Marginal Costing and Absorption Costing

There are accountants who favour all costing method.

Arguments in favour about absorption costing are specified as:

  1. To make output fixed production costs are incurred; consequently it is 'fair' to charge all output along with a share of these costs.
  2. Closing stock values via involving a share of fixed production overhead will be valued on the principle required for the financial accounting valuation of stocks via Standard accounting practice' statement on stocks and long-term contracts as SSAP 9.
  3. A problem along with calculating the contribution of various products made via a company is such it may not be clear whether the contribution earned via each product is sufficient to cover fixed costs, whereas via charging fixed overhead to a product it is probable to ascertain if it is profitable or not.

Arguments in favour about marginal costing are specified as:

  1. It is easy to operate
  2. There are no apportionments that are frequently done on the arbitrary basis, of fixed costs. Many costs, as like the managing director's salary, are indivisible along with nature.
  3. Fixed costs will be the similar regardless of the volume of output, since they are period costs. It makes as hence, to charge them in full like a cost to the period.
  4. The cost to make an extra unit is the variable production cost. It is realistic to value closing stock items at its directly attributable cost.
  5. Beneath or over absorption of overheads is avoided.
  6. Marginal costing information can be required for decision-making however absorption costing information is not appropriate for decision-making.
  7. Fixed costs as like depreciation, rent and salaries concern to a period of time and must be charged against the revenues of the period whether they are incurred.

Obviously, the choice of method does not have to be between marginal costing and absorption costing. Now we looked at ABC like an alternative to absorption costing.  Attributable contribution costing is one more alternative. This includes attributing certain fixed costs to the activities that cause them and then utilizing marginal costing to compute a contribution for every activity, the surplus of contribution over attributable fixed costs being known like attributable contribution.

Posted Date: 2/7/2013 12:13:54 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Comparison between marginal and absorption costing, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Comparison between marginal and absorption costing, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Comparison between marginal and absorption costing Discussions

Write discussion on Comparison between marginal and absorption costing
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Service Cost Centres Since no production cost units pass via the service cost centers, it is essential to apportion the service department costs; to the production cost center


KIW Ltd currently orders Material B in batches of 2,500 kgs. Material B is consumed at a steady, known rate over the company's planning horizon of one year. The current usage is 40

XYZ Corporation recieves $100,000 from investors for issuing them shares of its stock. XYZ's journal entry to record this transaction would include a a debit to investment b

A listed entity, had 3,000,000 $1 ordinary shares in issue, On 1 January 2009 CSA.CSA made a bonus issue of 1 for 3, On 1 May 2009. CSA issued 2,000,000 $1 ordinary shares for $3.2

Atkinson's Reliable Tools makes two products that use similar raw materials: #587Q and #253X. Estimated production needs for a unit of each product follows. #587Q #253X Steel (in p

conard transfered 10000 from her account to the business

Seventeen new bathing suit stores enter the Santa Barbara market, joining the seven that already existed. As a consequence, the demand schedule facing Swim N Style (and all other s

Accrued liabilities show expenses or obligations incurred in the earlier accounting period but the payment for similar will be made in the subsequent period. In several cases where

In Lowe's Companies, Inc. 2012 Annual Report (Form 10-K) 1. Evaluate Lowe's investment in property, plant and equipment. Determine the following amounts as reported by Lowe's on it