Comparison between marginal and absorption costing, Cost Accounting

Comparison between Marginal Costing and Absorption Costing

There are accountants who favour all costing method.

Arguments in favour about absorption costing are specified as:

  1. To make output fixed production costs are incurred; consequently it is 'fair' to charge all output along with a share of these costs.
  2. Closing stock values via involving a share of fixed production overhead will be valued on the principle required for the financial accounting valuation of stocks via Standard accounting practice' statement on stocks and long-term contracts as SSAP 9.
  3. A problem along with calculating the contribution of various products made via a company is such it may not be clear whether the contribution earned via each product is sufficient to cover fixed costs, whereas via charging fixed overhead to a product it is probable to ascertain if it is profitable or not.

Arguments in favour about marginal costing are specified as:

  1. It is easy to operate
  2. There are no apportionments that are frequently done on the arbitrary basis, of fixed costs. Many costs, as like the managing director's salary, are indivisible along with nature.
  3. Fixed costs will be the similar regardless of the volume of output, since they are period costs. It makes as hence, to charge them in full like a cost to the period.
  4. The cost to make an extra unit is the variable production cost. It is realistic to value closing stock items at its directly attributable cost.
  5. Beneath or over absorption of overheads is avoided.
  6. Marginal costing information can be required for decision-making however absorption costing information is not appropriate for decision-making.
  7. Fixed costs as like depreciation, rent and salaries concern to a period of time and must be charged against the revenues of the period whether they are incurred.

Obviously, the choice of method does not have to be between marginal costing and absorption costing. Now we looked at ABC like an alternative to absorption costing.  Attributable contribution costing is one more alternative. This includes attributing certain fixed costs to the activities that cause them and then utilizing marginal costing to compute a contribution for every activity, the surplus of contribution over attributable fixed costs being known like attributable contribution.

Posted Date: 2/7/2013 12:13:54 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Comparison between marginal and absorption costing, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Comparison between marginal and absorption costing, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Comparison between marginal and absorption costing Discussions

Write discussion on Comparison between marginal and absorption costing
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Methods of Cost Estimation We will consider given cost estimation methods commonly employed, namely as: a. High Low Activity method b. Engineering Analysis c. Account

Identify the individual cost components and the total cost of delivering the product from supplier to retailer.   Identify each cost in terms of the incremental addition to the pro

Evaluate the discounted mean term (DMT) of a bond redeemable at $120 nominal in 15 years time with annual coupons of 7% (based on a nominal bond of $100) at interest rates of 6% ,

(a) Calculate Mexico's producer surplus and consumer surplus in autarky. (b) Calculate the number of Mexican imports with as well as without the Tarriff. (c) Calculate Mexico

Mr. Marley is a wholesaler who buys and sells a wide range of products, one of which is the Laker. Mr. Marley sells 24,000 units of the Laker each year at a unit price $20. Sales o

MARGINAL COSTING AND DIFFERENTIAL COSTING 1.     Differential costing can be used both in case of marginal costing and absorption costing. 2.     In case of marginal costing

what are the legal distinctions between a business combination, a merger, and a consolidation.

The next year's budget for Benny, Inc., is given below: Product 1 & 2 Sales $945,000 & 688500 Variable costs 459,900 & 297,000 Fixed costs 300

The following are three independent situations where the reporting entity for which financial statements are being prepared are underlined. Every company has a December 31, 2012 ye

The Cutting Department of the Rock Island Custom Cabinetry Corporation (a process costing production) had no work in process at the beginning of the period, 12,000 units were compl