Common law rule - meetings and resolutions, Business Law and Ethics

Common law rule - meetings and resolutions:

The common law rule applies irrespective of whether the failure to give notice of the meeting was deliberate or unintentional.  However, it is competent for the company's members to reflect on the matter and, if they deem it appropriate, amend the company's articles by incorporation, therein of a suitable provision.  For example, Table A, Article 51 provides that "the accidental omission to give notice of a meeting to.... any person allowed to receive notice shall not invalidate the proceedings at that meeting".  Conversely in a case of like it, notice of the meeting would be deemed to have been given despite an "accidental omission" to give the notice:  Re: West Canadian Caollieries Ltd(90) commenting on the apparent attempt of the article to validate "the proceedings at" the meeting rather than the meeting itself, Plowman, J. stated:

"It must, I think, be implicit.. that a meeting, the proceedings of which  are to be taken to be valid notwithstanding the omission to be deemed to have been duly convened for the purposes of the articles... in the absence of such an implication, there would be no meeting the proceedings of which would be validated by the articles".

In Musselwhite v C. H. Musselwhite & Son Ltd (91) it was explained that a deliberate failure to give notice of a meeting to a member on the mistaken grounds that the member was not entitled to the notice would not be regarded as an "accidental omission" within the relevant article, since it was a mistake of the law.  The meeting was therefore declared null and void.

Table A, Article 134 provides that notice of every general meeting shall be given to -

a) every member of the company except those members who (having no registered address within Kenya have not supplied to the company an address within Kenya for the giving of notices to them;

b) the personal representation or trustee in bankruptcy of a member who, but therefore his death or bankruptcy, would be entitled to obtain notice of the meeting, and

c) such the auditor just for the time being of the company.

Posted Date: 1/12/2013 5:33:23 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Common law rule - meetings and resolutions, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Common law rule - meetings and resolutions, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Common law rule - meetings and resolutions Discussions

Write discussion on Common law rule - meetings and resolutions
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Question 1: (a) Explain what is meant by Subsidiary Legislation and the reasons for using such a Law. (b) Explain the ways in which Subsidiary Legislation is controlled.

Statutory Provisions:  i) Definition of "Prospectus" A prospectus is defined by S.2 as "any prospectus, notice, circular, advertisement or other invitation offering to the

Explain the principle of absolute immunity The absolute immunity principle gradually eroded and restrictive immunity approach was followed. However, many developing countries r

REGULATIONS REGARDING ELECTRICITY : You are aware that electricity is the most common and convenient source of power. You know that carelessness in handling or maintenance of elec

Hire-Purchase Law A person who wants to buy goods through does not have the like "money consideration" prescribed through the Sale of Goods Act like their price may enter in a

Effects of an Order for Compulsory Liquidation: The effects of the order are follows as are: (a) the Official Receiver (an Official of the High Court whose duties relate ma

Mode of Reduction: S.68 (1) expressly states that a company may reduce its capital "in any way". There is therefore no statutorily prescribed mode of reduction and the actual

Explain how you located the resource that addresses the question and cite that resource in proper Bluebook format: Spend & Save is claiming that our client lacks standing to s

Question 1: " One of those general precepts of our law of contract is that covenants legally entered into cannot be revoked except by the mutual consent of the parties theret

Part A Companies can raise finance by borrowing money and securing the debt by way of fixed or floating charge. Using case law in your answer explain what is the distinction b