Closure properties to prove regularity, Theory of Computation

The fact that regular languages are closed under Boolean operations simpli?es the process of establishing regularity of languages; in essence we can augment the regular operations with intersection and complement (as well as any other operations we can show preserve regularity). All one need do to prove a language is regular, then, is to show how to construct it from "obviously" regular languages using any of these operations. (A little care is needed about what constitutes "obvious". The safest thing to do is to take the language back all the way to ∅, {ε}, and the singleton languages of unit strings.)

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 1:27:16 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Closure properties to prove regularity, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Closure properties to prove regularity, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Closure properties to prove regularity Discussions

Write discussion on Closure properties to prove regularity
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
De?nition Deterministic Finite State Automaton: For any state set Q and alphabet Σ, both ?nite, a ?nite state automaton (FSA) over Q and Σ is a ?ve-tuple (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F), w

For example, the question of whether a given regular language is positive (does not include the empty string) is algorithmically decidable. "Positiveness Problem". Note that

One might assume that non-closure under concatenation would imply non closure under both Kleene- and positive closure, since the concatenation of a language with itself is included

The Last Stop Boutique is having a five-day sale. Each day, starting on Monday, the price will drop 10% of the previous day’s price. For example, if the original price of a product

design an automata for strings having exactly four 1''s

Construct a PDA that accepts { x#y | x, y in {a, b}* such that x ? y and xi = yi for some i, 1 = i = min(|x|, |y|) }. For your PDA to work correctly it will need to be non-determin

Suppose G = (N, Σ, P, S) is a reduced grammar (we can certainly reduce G if we haven't already). Our algorithm is as follows: 1. Define maxrhs(G) to be the maximum length of the

spam messages h= 98%, m= 90%, l= 80% non spam h=12%, m = 8%, l= 5% The organization estimates that 75% of all messages it receives are spam messages. If the cost of not blocking a

s->0A0|1B1|BB A->C B->S|A C->S|null find useless symbol?

And what this money. Invovle who it involves and the fact of,how we got itself identified candidate and not withstanding time date location. That shouts me media And answers who''v