Closure properties to prove regularity, Theory of Computation

The fact that regular languages are closed under Boolean operations simpli?es the process of establishing regularity of languages; in essence we can augment the regular operations with intersection and complement (as well as any other operations we can show preserve regularity). All one need do to prove a language is regular, then, is to show how to construct it from "obviously" regular languages using any of these operations. (A little care is needed about what constitutes "obvious". The safest thing to do is to take the language back all the way to ∅, {ε}, and the singleton languages of unit strings.)

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 1:27:16 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Closure properties to prove regularity, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Closure properties to prove regularity, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Closure properties to prove regularity Discussions

Write discussion on Closure properties to prove regularity
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Can you say that B is decidable? If you somehow know that A is decidable, what can you say about B?

The fact that regular languages are closed under Boolean operations simpli?es the process of establishing regularity of languages; in essence we can augment the regular operations

The generalization of the interpretation of strictly local automata as generators is similar, in some respects, to the generalization of Myhill graphs. Again, the set of possible s

1. Simulate a TM with infinite tape on both ends using a two-track TM with finite storage 2. Prove the following language is non-Turing recognizable using the diagnolization

Question 2 (10 pt): In this question we look at an extension to DFAs. A composable-reset DFA (CR-DFA) is a five-tuple, (Q,S,d,q0,F) where: – Q is the set of states, – S is the alph

This was one of the ?rst substantial theorems of Formal Language Theory. It's maybe not too surprising to us, as we have already seen a similar equivalence between LTO and SF. But

De?nition Deterministic Finite State Automaton: For any state set Q and alphabet Σ, both ?nite, a ?nite state automaton (FSA) over Q and Σ is a ?ve-tuple (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F), w

proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand the meaning of distinguished position .

Differentiate between DFA and NFA. Convert the following Regular Expression into DFA. (0+1)*(01*+10*)*(0+1)*. Also write a regular grammar for this DFA.

The key thing about the Suffx Substitution Closure property is that it does not make any explicit reference to the automaton that recognizes the language. While the argument tha