Chomsky-schutzenberger, Theory of Computation

The upper string r ∈ Q+ is the sequence of states visited by the automaton as it scans the lower string w ∈ Σ*. We will refer to this string over Q as the run of A on w. The automaton A accepts w iff the run of A on w ends in an accepting state. (If A is non-deterministic there will potentially be many runs with the automaton accepting if any one of them ends in an accepting state.) Note that the set of runs of an automaton is an SL2 language, recognized by the SL2 automaton (over Q) one gets by projecting away the third component of the triples of GA. Thus there is some kind of close relationship between the strictly local languages and the recognizable languages.

To get at this we will start by working in the other direction, extending our tiles to hold four symbols. The idea is to include, for each tile (q, p, σ) ∈ GA, a tile extended with σ′ for each σ′ ∈ Σ. (We don't actually need tiles for all such σ′ , only for those that occur on tiles (x, q, σ′) which might precede this one in a tiling, but including all of them will be harmless-the ones that do not occur on such tiles will just be useless.)

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 3:39:22 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Chomsky-schutzenberger, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Chomsky-schutzenberger, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Chomsky-schutzenberger Discussions

Write discussion on Chomsky-schutzenberger
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
When we say "solved algorithmically" we are not asking about a speci?c programming language, in fact one of the theorems in computability is that essentially all reasonable program

prove following function is turing computable? f(m)={m-2,if m>2, {1,if

Application of the general suffix substitution closure theorem is slightly more complicated than application of the specific k-local versions. In the specific versions, all we had

Both L 1 and L 2 are SL 2 . (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.) We claim that L 1 ∪ L 2 ∈ SL 2 . To see this, suppose, by way of con


What are the benefits of using work breakdown structure, Project Management

We developed the idea of FSA by generalizing LTk transition graphs. Not surprisingly, then, every LTk transition graph is also the transition graph of a FSA (in fact a DFA)-the one

shell script to print table in given range

matlab v matlab

We got the class LT by taking the class SL and closing it under Boolean operations. We have observed that LT ⊆ Recog, so certainly any Boolean combination of LT languages will also