Chomsky-schutzenberger, Theory of Computation

The upper string r ∈ Q+ is the sequence of states visited by the automaton as it scans the lower string w ∈ Σ*. We will refer to this string over Q as the run of A on w. The automaton A accepts w iff the run of A on w ends in an accepting state. (If A is non-deterministic there will potentially be many runs with the automaton accepting if any one of them ends in an accepting state.) Note that the set of runs of an automaton is an SL2 language, recognized by the SL2 automaton (over Q) one gets by projecting away the third component of the triples of GA. Thus there is some kind of close relationship between the strictly local languages and the recognizable languages.

To get at this we will start by working in the other direction, extending our tiles to hold four symbols. The idea is to include, for each tile (q, p, σ) ∈ GA, a tile extended with σ′ for each σ′ ∈ Σ. (We don't actually need tiles for all such σ′ , only for those that occur on tiles (x, q, σ′) which might precede this one in a tiling, but including all of them will be harmless-the ones that do not occur on such tiles will just be useless.)

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 3:39:22 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Chomsky-schutzenberger, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Chomsky-schutzenberger, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Chomsky-schutzenberger Discussions

Write discussion on Chomsky-schutzenberger
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
LTO was the closure of LT under concatenation and Boolean operations which turned out to be identical to SF, the closure of the ?nite languages under union, concatenation and compl

prove following function is turing computable? f(m)={m-2,if m>2, {1,if

Explain Theory of Computation ,Overview of DFA,NFA, CFG, PDA, Turing Machine, Regular Language, Context Free Language, Pumping Lemma, Context Sensitive Language, Chomsky Normal For

To see this, note that if there are any cycles in the Myhill graph of A then L(A) will be infinite, since any such cycle can be repeated arbitrarily many times. Conversely, if the

Suppose G = (N, Σ, P, S) is a reduced grammar (we can certainly reduce G if we haven't already). Our algorithm is as follows: 1. Define maxrhs(G) to be the maximum length of the

i want to do projects for theory of computation subject what topics should be best.

We saw earlier that LT is not closed under concatenation. If we think in terms of the LT graphs, recognizing the concatenation of LT languages would seem to require knowing, while

Differentiate between DFA and NFA. Convert the following Regular Expression into DFA. (0+1)*(01*+10*)*(0+1)*. Also write a regular grammar for this DFA.

It is not hard to see that ε-transitions do not add to the accepting power of the model. The underlying idea is that whenever an ID (q, σ  v) directly computes another (p, v) via