case, Business Law and Ethics

Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'''' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'''' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'''' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'''' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.
Posted Date: 10/16/2016 8:06:39 PM | Location :







Related Discussions:- case, Assignment Help, Ask Question on case, Get Answer, Expert's Help, case Discussions

Write discussion on case
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
1. a.  Read this summary of a journal article about education and the recent uprisings in the Middle b.    Model the decision whether to participate in a rally like our two peri

Right to sell - Terms used in Contract With S.14 (a) provides that there is an implied condition such seller has a right for sell the goods and, like in the case of an agreeme

LEGAL PROTECTION OF MINORITIES: According to decisions of English courts, companies are democratic organisations whose affairs are to be managed by the directors according to

RULE IN FOSS v HARBOTTLE:  What has come to be recognized in company law as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle" is the decision of Vice-Chancellor Wigram in the case of Foss v Harb

Illegality - Law of Contract Therefore an agreement to constitute a legally enforceable contract then it must have been entered into to a lawful purpose.  But an agreement to

QUESTION (a) Mr Raj owns a plot of land and wishes to invest in the tourism industry and seeks your advice as to whether he needs to apply for a tourist enterprise licence and

Can general jurisdiction be obtained? Explain why/why not.  The Company has paid for three (3) trips for Patty to attend Prop 65 conferences in CA.  You discover that she did no

Illustrate the principle of authority or power Authorities are delegated by the Principal to agents and it is the characteristic of all the governments. This delegation of auth

Delays: However certain standard defences knows as "essoins" caused considerable delay earlier than a case could be heard.  Now for a certain condition like the hearing of a c

Identify two firms with similar problems but from different countries. Conduct a comparative analysis of the firms.Analyze political, social, ethical, and legal differences facing