User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'''' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'''' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'''' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'''' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

McDonald''s VS Tim Horton''s sustainability report 2011, 1. set outs the di...

1. set outs the differences between the reports in terms of range of issues dealt with in the report and the depth of the coverage. 2. Explain the differences between the two repor

Explain the united nations convention on the law of the sea, United Nations...

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea The rights over the sea were extended by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) adopted in 1982. The UNCLO

Explain the case clipperton island, Explain the Case Clipperton Island ...

Explain the Case Clipperton Island In Clipperton Island Case , an award was made in the arbitration which resolved a dispute between France and Mexico, in 1887, on the subjec

How to calculate capacity of the system, David wants to open a restaurant i...

David wants to open a restaurant in Melbourne. He engages Robert Boyd Pty Ltd, an architectural firm, to design the restaurant interior and exterior including the layout and positi

The acts of non-state actor, The acts of non-state actor More important...

The acts of non-state actor More importantly, the concept of non-state actor needs be discussed by the concept of state responsibility, that is to say how and to what extent a

What is phoenix-like activities, Q. What is phoenix-like activities? Ph...

Q. What is phoenix-like activities? Phoenix activity and phoenix-like activities Many activities are referred to as "phoenixing" which do display phoenix-like characteristic

Issuing shares at a discount - allotment of shares, Issuing shares at a dis...

Issuing shares at a discount: In Ooregum Gold Mining Co of India Ltd v Roper (45) the House of Lords held that it is illegal for a limited company to issue its shares at a dis

Golden rule - presumptions of construction, Golden rule: Conversely th...

Golden rule: Conversely the so-called 'golden' rule will be utilized through the court in order to avoid arriving on an absurd decision under the literal rule of construction.

State the linkages among policy research and policy decision, State the lin...

State the linkages between policy research and policy decisions The linkages between policy research and analysis and policy decisions are complex and, often, problematic but t

Misfeasance - winding up, Misfeasance: Under s.324, misfeasance procee...

Misfeasance: Under s.324, misfeasance proceedings may be instituted against a director, promoter, manager, liquidator or "officer" (including an auditor) of a company in liqui

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521

Phone: +1-415-670-9521

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd