case, Business Law and Ethics

Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'''' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'''' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'''' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'''' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.
Posted Date: 10/16/2016 8:06:39 PM | Location :







Related Discussions:- case, Assignment Help, Ask Question on case, Get Answer, Expert's Help, case Discussions

Write discussion on case
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Terms used in Contract However there are certain terms may identify conditions and warranties like are implied into every contract covered through the Sale of Goods Act where

Exceptions - Authority of Partners The rule stated is a general rule, such there are a few exceptions for it.  Hence the chief of these exceptions are as follow: like; (a)

Bailment – Negotiable Instrument Whether Sir William Jones has specified the subsequent definition of bailment: like "A delivery of goods on trust on a contract, such express

QUESTION 1 What are the duties of an Occupational, Safety and Health officer in an organization? QUESTION 2 Section 47 (1) of the Occupational, Safety and Health Act st

Define the Strategic Voting and Policy Process Now we take up an important issue with respect to policy process. In standard models, where a single vote is taken directly as re

Declaration and Payment: There is no provision in the Act dealing with payment of dividends. It is therefore governed by the provisions of the company's articles, failing whic

Q. Statutory task force on phoenix activity ? A long term option could be the establishment of a statutory task force on phoenix activity. This could be supported by all the re

Contractual Capacity of Drunken Persons Whether a person purported to enter with a contract at a time at what time he was too drunk to understand then what he was doing and th

Experience Law This is a law of marketing beginning that the unit cost of value added to a standard goods, calculated in constant currency, declines by a constant percentage ea

Division of company's Powers: Article 80 of Table A states: "The business of the company shall be managed by the directors one who may... exercise all the such powers of th