Ascertainment bias, Advanced Statistics

Ascertainment bias: A feasible form of bias, particularly in the retrospective studies, which arises from the relationship between the exposure to the risk factor and the probability of detecting an event of interest. In the research comparing women with cervical cancer and the control group, for instance, an excess of oral contraceptive use with the cases might possibly be due to more often screening for the disease among the women known to be taking the pill.

 

975_ascertainment bias.png

A diagram illustrating the feed-forward network.

Posted Date: 7/26/2012 4:31:56 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Ascertainment bias, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Ascertainment bias, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Ascertainment bias Discussions

Write discussion on Ascertainment bias
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Point scoring is an easy distribution free method which can be used for the prediction of a response which is a binary variable from the observations on several explanatory variab

Hanging rootogram is   he diagram comparing the observed rootogram with the ?tted curve, in which dissimilarities between the two are displayed in relation to the horizontal axis,

Bayesian confidence interval : An interval of the posterior distribution which is so that the density of it at any point inside the interval is greater than that of the density at

Multiple imputation : The Monte Carlo technique in which missing values in the data set are replaced by m> 1 simulated versions, where m is usually small (say 3-10). Each of simula

The approach of controlling the error rate in an exploratory analysis where number of hypotheses are tested, but where the strict control which is provided by multiple comparison p

I need help solving a problem using excel.

Censored observations : An observation xi on some variable of interest is consired to be censored if it is known that xi Li (left-censored)or xi Ui (right-censored) where Li and Ui

Given: There are 4 jobs and 4 persons. The cost incurred for each person and each job is as follows: Persons Job 1 Job 2 Job 3 Job 4 A 10 9 21 11 B 15 12 25 17 C 12 10 20 12 D 17

The Null Hypothesis - H0:  γ 1 = γ 2 = ...  =  0  i.e.  there is no heteroscedasticity in the model The Alternative Hypothesis - H1:  at least one of the γ i 's are not equal

Formal graphical representation of the "causal diagrams" or the "path diagrams" where the  relationships are directed but acyclic (that is no feedback relations allowed). Plays an