Analysis of ethics issues case, Business Law and Ethics

Purpose: To enable course registrants to apply their knowledge of ethical principles, skills in ethical analysis, and use of introspection to analyze an actual case that contains administrative and clinical ethics issues.

Method: Successfully completing this analysis will require that course registrants: 1. Write a case that is based on professional or personal experience (or from the literature) that contains administrative and clinical ethics issues-the case may be single spaced and should take no more than a half page; 2. State the ethics issues present in the case; 3. Analyze the ethics issues using the moral philosophies and principles enunciated in Chapter 1 of the textbook; 4. Develop solutions that will solve the ethical problems identified; and 5. Suggest means by which similar ethical issues/problems could be prevented in the future.All elements mustbeincluded.Use headings to demark sections.

Step #1: This is the gem of the paper: your personal or professional experience with an ethical dilemma. You do not have to be a practitioner to deal with a clinical case. For example, you may have been a family member involved in making a decision regarding the care of someone. Write of how you struggled with that. As a last resort, go to the literature. And if you must go there, please pick a case that has not been written about repeatedly (e.g., Karen Ann Quinlan). Reminder: the case portion (only) may be single spaced and limited to one-half page.

Step #2: Should be self explanatory. Just cite the issues. Don't overlap with step #3.

Step #3: This is the one that can be confusing. Keep in mind that the moral philosophies and principles are NOT the same thing. There are at least seven philosophies described and five principles. To say how each philosophy and principle relates to your case leads to a shallow understanding of all of them and a trite rendition in the writing. Not good. Be parsimonious in your reference to the concepts in Chapter 1. You can develop and argument, e.g., for truth-telling (or beneficence, or autonomy, and so on) based upon a personal deontological or utilitarian (or any of the other moral philosophies) philosophical point of view. So, pick a line of reasoning and follow it. Above all, do not over-simplify the terms, especially deontology and utilitarianism. Read additional material if need be to enhance your understanding.

Grading criteria: Meeting the elements listed in Method, above. In addition, the quality of analysis, organization, clarity of presentation, and correct use of English will be considered in awarding a grade.

 ETHICAL CASE BEING ANALYZED

Oliver Harris is 82 years old and has been a resident at Five Oaks Nursing Home for 7 years.  When he first sought admission, Harris had been evaluated and found to be only marginally in need of the care provided at Five Oaks.  Because he was a private-pay patient, management decided to admit him.  For 5 years his health was such that he needed minimal nursing care.  In the sixth year, he began to show evidence of dementia.  Medical evaluation found that he had experienced several small strokes.  Harris likes to visit with other residents as he walks around the facility.  His declining physical condition has resulted in several falls, which caused cuts and bruises but no broken bones. 

           Harris's case was discussed at a staff conference.  It was the consensus to physically restrain him so that he could not ambulate independently.  Under federal guidelines, this was possible only with an order from Harris's physician.  Staff doubted the physician would agree, but they believed that if Harris continued to walk unassisted, it was only a matter of time before he fell and sustained a fracture.  Staff also believed that even if his physician ordered restraints, Harris would fight them.  When the issue was discussed with Harris, he was adamant that he not be restrained.  His daughter, however, agreed that physical restraint was wise.

Posted Date: 3/6/2013 5:40:50 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Analysis of ethics issues case, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Analysis of ethics issues case, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Analysis of ethics issues case Discussions

Write discussion on Analysis of ethics issues case
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
(a)  In Malaysia, there are many sources of written and unwritten law. Discuss the sources of unwritten law.      (b)  What are the different methods used in interpretation of s

Q. Approaches to defining phoenix activity? There are a number of approaches to defining phoenix activity that could be used. These approaches are summarised below. It should b

COMMENCEMENT: However section 46(4) of the constitution offers that like, a law made through Parliament shall not come in operation whether it has been published in the Englan

Jack has operated a house building business as a sole trader for a number of years. Now, his accountant has recommended that he should consider registering as a company in order to

Determine the policy process point of view Viewing from the policy process point of view, we find that while voting for legislature, the rational candidates and voters have inf

QUESTION 1 (a) By referring to the features documentary credits, explain how such an instrument can enhance and facilitate business activities (b) Discuss the applicability

DISADVANTAGES: Whether delegated or subsidiary legislation has been criticised just to a variety of reasons, the main ones being that it is:as; (a)   Less democratic Whe

Helen Brown's husband Mark was recently charged with an offence under the Welfare of the Community Act 1962 (Qld).  It is likely that Helen will be called as a witness against hi

Explain whether Mike should be excused from not performing under the contract with Jim: Facts Mike ran an excavation business whereby he was contracted by builders to use his exca

CONDITIONS FOR RELIEF: In H.R. Harmer Ltd (1959) Jenkins L.J. summarised the conditions which must be met before relief under the section can be granted by the court when he s