Analyse ethical and legal issues , Business Law and Ethics

Fran is a 68 year old female patient with a history of diabetes.  Fran separated from her husband, Derek, 3 years ago (although they are not divorced) and over the past few years they have seen each other rarely. Fran now lives in the downstairs self-contained 'granny flat' of her daughter, June. Her son, Marcus, lives a 1 hour drive away. They talk on the telephone at least once a week and Marcus often visits his sister and Mum.

Although Fran has suffered from peripheral vascular disease over a number of years, she has continued to maintain an independent lifestyle and regularly goes out with friends and enjoys weekly games of bowls at her local club.

Fran was recently admitted to hospital with arterial ulcers and sepsis. Due to septic shock, she was intubated and sent to the intensive care unit. Nursing staff on her treating team have been the main point of contact for the family during their daily visits. Fran is currently unconscious and is not expected to regain consciousness until the sepsis resolves.  The treating team advise Fran's family that due to the advanced stage of her condition, a decision needs to be made quickly about which treatment option should be chosen for Fran.  The treating team advises that the options are:

1)  Fran can have her leg amputated. This is seen to be the safest option as it minimises the risks of sepsis.  However, in order to regain mobility and independence a significant period of recovery and rehabilitation would be necessary.

2)  The treating team can attempt to revascularise her leg. This will potentially save the limb, but raises the risk of Fran's condition deteriorating if the sepsis does not resolve.

Marcus says that he wants what is best for his Mum and that means the safest option. He does not want his Mum to suffer any further complications and believes that the amputation should be carried out immediately.  Being the eldest child, Marcus feels that he should be the one who makes decisions for his Mum. Fran's husband, Derek, also agrees with Marcus.

However, June believes that what has been most important to Fran in the past few years has been her ability to live independently, including her weekly social interaction at the bowls club. June says that although nothing was ever put into writing her Mum often said that, if necessary, she wanted June to make decisions for her so that she is not, 'stuck in bed like those poor people in a nursing home who have no life'. Therefore, June wants the treating team to try revascularising Fran's leg.

Analyse the relevant ethical and legal issues in relation to this scenario by applying the ethical decision-making framework provided in this unit.

Posted Date: 2/25/2013 12:06:28 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Analyse ethical and legal issues , Assignment Help, Ask Question on Analyse ethical and legal issues , Get Answer, Expert's Help, Analyse ethical and legal issues Discussions

Write discussion on Analyse ethical and legal issues
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Question 1: (a) Explain the concept of Salomon Principle and critically analyse its importance in company Law. (b) Discuss why and in what circumstances the court will pierc

1. How does the Melian dialogue represent key concepts such as self-interest, the balance of power, alliance, capabilities, empires and justice? Athenian leaders arrive on the is

Determine the term - Fixed Exchange Rates With a fixed exchange rate adjustment toward long run equilibrium occurs via monetary effects. This effect is shown in Figure 9.1. At

Question 1: (a) Expliquez les conditions qui doivent être réunis pour la formation d'un contrat. (b) Expliquez les differentes modes selon lesquels un contrat peut prendre

Order of application of assets: The order of application of assets is therefore as follows: (a) secured creditors who have fixed charges are entitled to be paid out of thei

Maintenance Of Capital: The issued share capital of a company limited by shares is the primary security for the company's creditors. In Re: Exchange Banking Co (Flitcroft's Ca

Article 5 - State Responsibilty Article 5. Acts of persons authorized by a state to act on their behalf then the state is responsible for the actions of that person. For exampl

TAKE-OVER BID:                   If Company A ("the transferee company") offers to acquire shares of Company B ("the transferor") and the scheme or contract to which the off

Domicile of Dependence Moreover this is the domicile a person acquires by virtue of legal dependency. Hence it is determined through the domicile of the other person. Howev

QUESTION 1 Discuss the possible defences available to a trustee in proceedings for breach of trust QUESTION 2 Consider the legal differences between a custodian and a m