Alternative dispute resolution, Business Law and Ethics

"The liability of third party neutrals has been a topic of concern ever since the formalisation of dispute resolution in Australia.  Although there are no known cases in Australia of a third party neutral being sued for breach of contract, fiduciary duty or negligence, there is always the possibility that proceedings will be brought against a third party under such a cause of action.  This type of action needs to be distinguished from a mere failure to advise where the third party neutral is for example a lawyer, which would probably attract sanctions under the Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) for unprofessional conduct or professional misconduct."

1. What are origins of and the policy justifications for according immunity from suit to ADR neutrals?   Do you agree with these justifications?   Give reasons for your answer.

2. What are the possible sources of immunity from suit applicable to ADR neutrals and to what causes of action might such immunity apply?

Notes:

1. Each element of your answer should, in particular, discuss whether and, if so, how immunity may apply to both non-judicial and judicial ADR neutrals, in particular:

                (i) Mediators;

                (ii) Conciliators;

                (iii) Arbitrators; and

                (iv) Independent experts.

2. You should cite any relevant legislation, case law, policy documents and guidance issued by ADR institutions and institutional procedural rules in support of your answer.  Comparison with overseas jurisdictions would be appropriate.

3. For the avoidance of any doubt, your answer must discuss immunity from suit for ADR neutrals only.  You must not discuss the liability of third party legal advisers.

Posted Date: 2/22/2013 1:21:13 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Alternative dispute resolution, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Alternative dispute resolution, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Alternative dispute resolution Discussions

Write discussion on Alternative dispute resolution
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
State Montevideo Convention Montevideo Convention states : "The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by other States. Even before recognition the st

ADVANTAGES: Therefore some of the advantages or strong point of delegated legislation are:as; (a)   Compensation of lost Parliamentary time Conversely parliamentarians a

Completion of the Agreement However the hirer may give written notice about intention to complete the purchase through paying the owner on a specified day like the balance due

Vacation of Office: In addition to vacating office under the aforesaid provisions of Article 88 a person may cease to be a director for various reasons like as;-

DISCLAIMER OF ASSETS: The liquidator has a statutory right of disclaimer of assets: s.135.  The rules are: (a)     he must obtain leave of the court; (b)     the right o

1.(a) identify and give out the explanation of different categories of legal system. (b) How is legal system in bznz enforce

Question 1: How does Kelsen distinguish between the act of a gang of robbers and the act of a tax authority? Question 2: Referring to legal theorists you have studied,

Act defined a traffic indication: However in EVANS v CROSS, Evans was charged by ignoring namely, a traffic sign, a white line painted in the middle of a road, whether overtak

Nature of a Company: There is no precise legal definition of "a company". This is due to historical reasons which are too lengthy to be narrated in this text. Suffice it to sa

Deadlock in the management: The company existed only to "work a particular patent" and as it could not do so it should be wound up. But if there are two or more alternative