Alternative dispute resolution, Business Law and Ethics

"The liability of third party neutrals has been a topic of concern ever since the formalisation of dispute resolution in Australia.  Although there are no known cases in Australia of a third party neutral being sued for breach of contract, fiduciary duty or negligence, there is always the possibility that proceedings will be brought against a third party under such a cause of action.  This type of action needs to be distinguished from a mere failure to advise where the third party neutral is for example a lawyer, which would probably attract sanctions under the Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) for unprofessional conduct or professional misconduct."

1. What are origins of and the policy justifications for according immunity from suit to ADR neutrals?   Do you agree with these justifications?   Give reasons for your answer.

2. What are the possible sources of immunity from suit applicable to ADR neutrals and to what causes of action might such immunity apply?

Notes:

1. Each element of your answer should, in particular, discuss whether and, if so, how immunity may apply to both non-judicial and judicial ADR neutrals, in particular:

                (i) Mediators;

                (ii) Conciliators;

                (iii) Arbitrators; and

                (iv) Independent experts.

2. You should cite any relevant legislation, case law, policy documents and guidance issued by ADR institutions and institutional procedural rules in support of your answer.  Comparison with overseas jurisdictions would be appropriate.

3. For the avoidance of any doubt, your answer must discuss immunity from suit for ADR neutrals only.  You must not discuss the liability of third party legal advisers.

Posted Date: 2/22/2013 1:21:13 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Alternative dispute resolution, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Alternative dispute resolution, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Alternative dispute resolution Discussions

Write discussion on Alternative dispute resolution
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Describe the policy making realities Rational models simply do not describe policy making realities. As policy actors seldom evaluate very many alternatives for action or compa

QUESTION 1 Explain the composition and functions of the following institutions- (i) Employment Relations Tribunal (ii) Commission for Conciliation and Mediation QUEST

Both Sudan and the US are signatories to the "New York Convention."  A Sudanese company has won its case in a Sudanese arbitration panel.  The U.S. company has declined to pay this

Question 1: Mr Ben is the director of ABC Ltd. He wishes to know whether he has any responsibility under the OSHA regarding the presence of the following in his enterprise:

Rule in Turquands case: This statement can be reduced to two propositions which constitute what is compositely known as "the rule in Turquand's case", namely:; i. A person

Appointment of Arbitrators However under sec 12(1) the parties are free just for agree on the procedure of appointing arbitrators. Therefore under sec 31(1) the parties are

Equity: Moreover the word "equity" ordinarily means "fairness" or "justice".  In fact as a source of England law there the phrase "doctrines of equity" denotes the body of Eng

Intention - Element of Contract Moreover to an agreement to constitute a contract then the parties thereto must have intended it for have legal consequences.  Subsequently an

General principles of Calls on contributories: If it is necessary to make calls on contributories the liquidator draws up a list "A" of contributories who were members at th

Sub: Filing Divorce and Issue of Restraining order services Dear Kimberly Frederick Bumfree, Warm Greetings from Donald & Matthews Law firm, This letter is for your imme