Alternative dispute resolution, Business Law and Ethics

"The liability of third party neutrals has been a topic of concern ever since the formalisation of dispute resolution in Australia.  Although there are no known cases in Australia of a third party neutral being sued for breach of contract, fiduciary duty or negligence, there is always the possibility that proceedings will be brought against a third party under such a cause of action.  This type of action needs to be distinguished from a mere failure to advise where the third party neutral is for example a lawyer, which would probably attract sanctions under the Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) for unprofessional conduct or professional misconduct."

1. What are origins of and the policy justifications for according immunity from suit to ADR neutrals?   Do you agree with these justifications?   Give reasons for your answer.

2. What are the possible sources of immunity from suit applicable to ADR neutrals and to what causes of action might such immunity apply?

Notes:

1. Each element of your answer should, in particular, discuss whether and, if so, how immunity may apply to both non-judicial and judicial ADR neutrals, in particular:

                (i) Mediators;

                (ii) Conciliators;

                (iii) Arbitrators; and

                (iv) Independent experts.

2. You should cite any relevant legislation, case law, policy documents and guidance issued by ADR institutions and institutional procedural rules in support of your answer.  Comparison with overseas jurisdictions would be appropriate.

3. For the avoidance of any doubt, your answer must discuss immunity from suit for ADR neutrals only.  You must not discuss the liability of third party legal advisers.

Posted Date: 2/22/2013 1:21:13 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Alternative dispute resolution, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Alternative dispute resolution, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Alternative dispute resolution Discussions

Write discussion on Alternative dispute resolution
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
State the theory of international antitrust A fourth approach is the allocation of jurisdiction over conduct with multijurisdictional effects to one agency by another agency th

Misfeasance: Under s.324, misfeasance proceedings may be instituted against a director, promoter, manager, liquidator or "officer" (including an auditor) of a company in liqui

QUESTION 1 The Bank of Mauritius has got various objects. It has therefore got various functions and powers in order to achieve the attainment of its objects. Discuss QUEST

Presentment for Acceptance - Rules Relating To Acceptance Even though a bill must be presented to with acceptance and be accepted through the drawee in order to render him lia

You act for Fred who is the secured lending manager of BigBank. He has a troublesome customer, Macs Tires Pty Ltd. This is a family run tire business with three directors. The prin

Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

Financial Assistance For Purchase Of Own Shares: i) Financial Assistance For Purchase Of Own Shares S.56 (1) of the Act renders it unlawful for a company to give there wher

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea The rights over the sea were extended by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) adopted in 1982. The UNCLO

What are the types of international law? Two main types of international laws are there, it is public international law and private international law. Public law is law th

Undischarged Bankrupts: S.188 provides that if an undischarged bankrupt acts as director of any company without leave of the court he shall be liable to imprisonment for a ter