Alternative dispute resolution, Business Law and Ethics

"The liability of third party neutrals has been a topic of concern ever since the formalisation of dispute resolution in Australia.  Although there are no known cases in Australia of a third party neutral being sued for breach of contract, fiduciary duty or negligence, there is always the possibility that proceedings will be brought against a third party under such a cause of action.  This type of action needs to be distinguished from a mere failure to advise where the third party neutral is for example a lawyer, which would probably attract sanctions under the Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) for unprofessional conduct or professional misconduct."

1. What are origins of and the policy justifications for according immunity from suit to ADR neutrals?   Do you agree with these justifications?   Give reasons for your answer.

2. What are the possible sources of immunity from suit applicable to ADR neutrals and to what causes of action might such immunity apply?

Notes:

1. Each element of your answer should, in particular, discuss whether and, if so, how immunity may apply to both non-judicial and judicial ADR neutrals, in particular:

                (i) Mediators;

                (ii) Conciliators;

                (iii) Arbitrators; and

                (iv) Independent experts.

2. You should cite any relevant legislation, case law, policy documents and guidance issued by ADR institutions and institutional procedural rules in support of your answer.  Comparison with overseas jurisdictions would be appropriate.

3. For the avoidance of any doubt, your answer must discuss immunity from suit for ADR neutrals only.  You must not discuss the liability of third party legal advisers.

Posted Date: 2/22/2013 1:21:13 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Alternative dispute resolution, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Alternative dispute resolution, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Alternative dispute resolution Discussions

Write discussion on Alternative dispute resolution
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Presumptions: Therefore in their attempt to construe statutes that courts of law are guided through the subsequent assumptions or presumptions.; (a)   That the statute was

QUESTION (a) In scientific ethics, list four fundamental principles of scientific research? (b) Give five differences between law and ethics (c) When does a ‘Conflict of

Sale of Goods However in US Law relating to the sale and purchase of goods is such contained in the Sale of Goods Act like cap 31. Therefore the Act is a reproduction of Goods

International Competition Law -  Select a specific industry or corporation and analyse the factors that determine a competitive or anticompetitive outcome; - Factors such a

What is the neighbour rule? Duty of care: There is a duty of care by anyone to other where this can be reasonably foreseen which one’s action may injure another (negligen

Realization of Auditors: it is a mere truism to say that the value of loans and securities depends on their realization.  We were told that a statement to that effect, is so u

1. Maryland is one of a few states in which contributory negligence is a complete defense, barring the plaintiff from any recovery. What is contributory negligence? How does it com

QUESTION 1 (a) Compare and contrast the different rules and features governing the burden and standard of proof in both civil and criminal cases (b) The art of advocacy is n

Auditors: APPOINTMENT:           S.159 (1) provides that "every company shall at each annual general meeting appoint an auditor or auditors to hold office from the above

Resident Magistrate's Court Establishment Further Resident Magistrate's Court is constituted through S.3 (1) of the Magistrate's Courts Act that is provides that 'ther