Alternative dispute resolution, Business Law and Ethics

"The liability of third party neutrals has been a topic of concern ever since the formalisation of dispute resolution in Australia.  Although there are no known cases in Australia of a third party neutral being sued for breach of contract, fiduciary duty or negligence, there is always the possibility that proceedings will be brought against a third party under such a cause of action.  This type of action needs to be distinguished from a mere failure to advise where the third party neutral is for example a lawyer, which would probably attract sanctions under the Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) for unprofessional conduct or professional misconduct."

1. What are origins of and the policy justifications for according immunity from suit to ADR neutrals?   Do you agree with these justifications?   Give reasons for your answer.

2. What are the possible sources of immunity from suit applicable to ADR neutrals and to what causes of action might such immunity apply?

Notes:

1. Each element of your answer should, in particular, discuss whether and, if so, how immunity may apply to both non-judicial and judicial ADR neutrals, in particular:

                (i) Mediators;

                (ii) Conciliators;

                (iii) Arbitrators; and

                (iv) Independent experts.

2. You should cite any relevant legislation, case law, policy documents and guidance issued by ADR institutions and institutional procedural rules in support of your answer.  Comparison with overseas jurisdictions would be appropriate.

3. For the avoidance of any doubt, your answer must discuss immunity from suit for ADR neutrals only.  You must not discuss the liability of third party legal advisers.

Posted Date: 2/22/2013 1:21:13 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Alternative dispute resolution, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Alternative dispute resolution, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Alternative dispute resolution Discussions

Write discussion on Alternative dispute resolution
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Determine the schemes of Michael Mandelbaum Michael Mandelbaum has offered a two fold scheme, the inside-out and outside-in approach. According to inside-out approach, a natio

ISSUE OF NON-STATE ACTORS The concept of Non-state actor is a recent political development, which has, so far, eluded a concise definition. There are no treaties or conventions

Substantive Law: Therefore this is concerned through the rules themselves as opposed to the procedure on how to affect them.  So it defines the rights and duties of parties an

QUESTION 1 (a) Why is it that businesses are increasingly exposed to scrutiny and criticisms? (b) Discuss four strategies which can be adopted to respond to these criticisms

Explain importance of Jurisdiction Jurisdiction is  an  important  and  extensive concept  referred  to  and  used  very  frequently in international law. It provides clear n

Throughout this course, you have analyzed and discussed case studies and issues on key ethical issues in information technology. Now it is time to consider how these theories apply

Companys Constitution: The constitution of a registered company consists of two  documents, namely, the memorandum of association and the articles of association. The contents

EXPLAIN THE KNGSTON COTTON MILL CASE

Question 1: (a) Define the term "Multimodal transport". (b) State the advantages of multimodal transport for forwarders. (c) Describe the different forms of multimodal trans

Exceptions - Authority of Partners The rule stated is a general rule, such there are a few exceptions for it.  Hence the chief of these exceptions are as follow: like; (a)