Allotment of shares, Business Law and Ethics

ALLOTMENT OF SHARES:

An allotment, legally, is the company's acceptance of an offer to buy its shares. Thus we can say it is governed by the following rules of the common law relating to contract.

a)      Where a company issues a prospectus, the issue is an invitation to treat but not an offer. It is not regarded as an offer because of practical reasons: if it was regarded as an offer where each application made pursuant thereto would constitute an acceptance and the company would be contractually bound to allot all the shares applied for. If the issue was oversubscribed, the company would be sued by the applicants who were not given the shares they had applied for. As this appears to be unjust the English courts have avoided the eventuality by regarding the issue of the prospectus merely as an invitation to treat. Where applications are made that they will constitute offers. The company would then find out how many shares had been applied for and, if the issue is oversubscribed, accept applications which equal the shares available and reject the others. The company would not be sued by those to whom shares have not been allotted because there would be no contract between them and the company. They made offers which were not accepted by the company - and the company could not accept the various offers because it did not have shares to sell.

b)      The company's acceptance must be unconditional. If, therefore, the application was for 10 shares and only 5 were allotted, the allotment would be a counter-offer which the allottee could reject. But this might be the only reasonable or just thing for the company to do if the issue was over-subscribed. In order to overcome the legal problem, companies invariably prepare application forms which contain a clause to the effect that the applicant "agrees to accept" such number of shares as the company in its absolute discretion may allot to him.

c)      The acceptance must be communicated to the applicant. This means that the allottee must actually receive the letter of allotment so that he is aware of the allotment. Whether the letter of allotment is lost in transit there would be no binding contract. However, it was explained in Household Fire Insurance Co. Ltd v Grant (46) that, if the applicant expressly or impliedly authorised the company to communicate the acceptance by post, there would be a binding contract the moment the letter of acceptance is posted. It is irrelevant that the letter was delayed or, as in that case, was lost in transit. In such a case the Post Office would be regarded as the applicant's agent and delivery of the letter of allotment to the post office would legally be equivalent to its delivery to the applicant himself-in accordance with the principles of the law of agency.

d)      The allotment must be made within a reasonable time: Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Co v Montefiore (47).

Posted Date: 1/12/2013 3:11:43 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Allotment of shares, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Allotment of shares, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Allotment of shares Discussions

Write discussion on Allotment of shares
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
State Article 16 of international law Article 16, states that a newly independent State is not bound to maintain in force, or to become a party to, any treaty by reason only of

phoenix activity involves "the evasion of tax and other liabilities, such as employee entitlements, through the deliberate, systematic and sometimes cyclic liquidation of related c

Who would think a documentary about the collapse of a mammoth corporation could play out like a drama with the emotional power of Greek tragedy? But that is the impact of enroll:th

Q. What is Zone Refining? This method is used to obtain metals of very high purity. The basic principle involved in this process is similar to fractional crystallisation. A sma

Remedies of the Buyer - Sales of Goods (a)Damages for non-delivery Section number 51 (1) provides that whether the seller wrongfully neglects or refuses to deliver the go

Question 1 Explain the sections 167 and 172 of the Indian penal code Question 2 Write a note on the Cyber Regulations Appellate Tribunal Question 3 Write a note on Digit

MEANING OF "OPPRESSION":                    The Section does not define the word "oppression" or what constitutes "oppressive conduct".  However, the Cohen Committee's Report

Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

Attorney General However the office of the Attorney simply is established through sec (i) of the constitution. In the public service it is an office.  Appointment of

Bailment – Negotiable Instrument Whether Sir William Jones has specified the subsequent definition of bailment: like "A delivery of goods on trust on a contract, such express