Advanced monetary theory, Microeconomics

Consider a hypothetical ABC economy in which the narrowly-defined measure of the  money supply (M1), as defined in the Canadian sense, in existence is 1250$ million. Assuming the economy's banking system behavior may be characterized by the following simple broad money-multiplier model in which all the variables are as defined in class:

MB= C+RR+ER (equilibrium condition)

C=0.25D (currency holdings of the non-bank public)

RR=RRd+RRt

RRd=0.05D (required reserves against demand deposits)

RRt=0.02T (required reserves against term deposits)

T=0.8D (definition of term deposits)

ER=ERd+ERt

ERd=0.002D (ratio of excess reserves to demand deposits)

ERt=0.001T (ratio of excess reserves to term deposits)

Posted Date: 3/14/2013 5:34:21 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Advanced monetary theory, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Advanced monetary theory, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Advanced monetary theory Discussions

Write discussion on Advanced monetary theory
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Implications of Williams model of managerial discretion in Nepalese industries

compare and contrast adam smith''s theory of absolute advantage theory and david ricardo''s comparative advantage theory of international trade.

Meaning of absolute cost difference and comparative cost difference.

illustrate and discuss implications of various market structure(non competitive and competitive) for price determination

Cropping Pattern Over Time: The dominance of food crops and among food crops that of rice and wheat only states the existing cropping patterns. It is important to study the tr

Unemployment: Individuals who want to be employed, and are actively seeking work, but can't find a job, are considered ‘officially' unemployed. Individuals who aren't working, but

Q. What is Free Trade Agreements? Free Trade Agreements:It is an agreement between two or more countriesthat eliminates tariffs on trade between the countries, reduces non-tari

net preparation ranjna baghel

consumer=m with the help of indifference curve analyis

do you think that dimnishing returns to a factor are consistent with increasing returns to scale? explain with suitable diagram and reasoning.