Acceptance - law of contract, Business Law and Ethics

Acceptance - Law of Contract

  • Conversely an offer made to the general public can be established through anybody who fulfil that performs then the conditions stated therein. So however Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. - whether as Mrs Carlill was held for have accepted the offer but it had not been made to her personally.
  • Therefore an offer made to a class of persons can be established only through a person of that class: as Wood v. Lectrik Ltd. - whether there an offer to "hair sufferers" that was held to have been properly accepted through Mr. Wood - a young man that whose hair was prematurely turning grey and then was regarded through the court as a "hair sufferer" during the terms of the offer.
  • However an offer made to a particular person can be acknowledged only through the particular person: as Boulton v. Jones - whether there it was held that an offer made through Jones to Brocklehurst could not be received through Boulton.
  • However the acceptance of an offer be obliged to be unconditional:as Hyde v. Wrench -whether there it was held such the "acceptance" to buy the house on £950 destroyed the offer to sell such the house with £1,000. Neale v Merrett. However offer terminated through a counter - offer cannot be invigorated through a subsequent tender of performance thereof.
  • Conversely an acceptance of an offer communicated for the offeror verbally with the offeree is effective from moment the offeror hears the offeree's words:as Entores Ltd. V. Miles Far East Corporation like obiter dictum through Lord Denning)
  • Whether the offeror and the offeree negotiate with telephone the acceptance is complete the moment for the offeror hears the offeree's words of acceptance: like Entores Ltd. V. Miles Far East Corporation (obiter dictum through Lord Denning).
  • Whether the offeror and the offeree negotiate with telex the acceptance will be effective beginning the instant that the telex message is received with the offeror: Entores Ltd. V. Miles Far East Corporation - whereas it was held that the contract was formed in the London whereas the offeror received the telex message from the Amsterdam.
  • Whether as the offeror expressly or impliedly authorised offeree for transmit his acceptance with post the acceptance will be effective on the moment the letter about acceptance is posted: as Byrne v. Van Tien Hoven - whenever it was held that the acceptance was effective whether the plaintiffs posted their letter on date October 11th in the New York but the defendants in Cardiff were not attentive of the posting.
Posted Date: 1/22/2013 1:57:41 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Acceptance - law of contract, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Acceptance - law of contract, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Acceptance - law of contract Discussions

Write discussion on Acceptance - law of contract
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
I am an executive being transferred from my home city on the west coast to one in the Midwest. I know nothing about the city I'm moving to, but I have to buy a house there. Realtor

Order of application of assets: The order of application of assets is therefore as follows: (a) secured creditors who have fixed charges are entitled to be paid out of thei

Appeals - Court-Martial In fact in Section 115 of the Armed Forces Act including a person who has been convicted through a court-martial to appeal to the High Court either aga

QUESTION 1 The proliferation of tribunals, enquiries and quasi-judicial bodies constitutes the risk of a new type of despotism in running public affairs. How do the courts ensu

Insanity and Rejection - Termination of an Offer Insanity Furthermore the unsoundness of mind about either party before acceptance terminates the offer.  Hence the offe

Stolen Goods - Sales of Goods Where goods have been stolen and had been the thief has been prosecuted and convicted, such the property in the goods revests in like original ow

When is an employer vicariously liable? An employer is vicariously liable when: a. When Employer authorised. b. When unauthorised procedure utilized when executing an aut

Analyze the differences between a proposal and an invitation to treat and discuss the rules to determine the point of time on which an agreement is reached. Using the latest Malays

Adequacy of consideration - Law of Contract Well provided that consideration is sufficient, or actual it necessitate not be adequate.  Hence the court will not compare the val

Companys debts: In case a company is unable to pay its debts the creditors, or a creditor, may petition the High Court for an order to wind it up. During the winding up the me