Abatement of legacies-executorship laws and accounts, Financial Accounting

ABATEMENT OF LEGACIES

(a) If the assets, after the payment of debts, necessary expenses and specific legacies, are not sufficient to pay all the general legacies in full, the latter abate in equal proportion, and the personal representative has no right to pay one legatee in preference to another nor to retain any money on account of a legacy to himself or to any other person for whom he is a trustee; however, if the personal representative is entitled to a priority in respect of his remuneration, that priority is upheld.

(b) For the purposes of abasement, a legacy for life, a sum appropriated by the will to produce an annuity, and the value of annuity when no sum has been  appropriated to produce it, shall be treated as general legacies.

(c) Where there is a specific legacy and the assets are sufficient for the payment of debts and necessary expenses, the thing specified must be delivered to the legatee without any abatement.

(d) Where there is a demonstrative legacy, and the assets are sufficient for the payment of debts and necessary expenses, the legatee shall have a preferential claim for payment of his legacy out of the fund from which the legacy is directed to be paid until the fund is exhausted, and if the fund is exhausted, but part of the legacy still remains unpaid, he shall be entitled to rank for the remainder against the general assets as for a legacy of the amount of the unpaid remainder.

(e) If the assets are not sufficient to answer the debts and the specific legacies, an abatement shall be made from the latter rateably in proportion to their respective amounts.

(f) Where personal representatives have given such notice as may be prescribed for creditors and others to send in their claims against the estate of the deceased, the personal representatives can distribute the assets of the estate at the expiration of the time stated; they shall not be liable for the assets so distributed to any person of whose claim they have not had notice at the time of distribution.  The creditor or claimant has the right to follow the asset in the hands or persons who received them.

(g) Where personal representatives have paid any legacy which, but for the payment, would have been liable to abatement as above, they shall be entitled to call upon the legatee to refund the amount by which the legacy should have abated only if:

  • The legacy was paid under any order of the court; or
  • If and so far as the abatement is rendered necessary by discovery of a debt of which the personal representative had no notice at the time of voluntary payment of the legacy.
Posted Date: 12/13/2012 4:48:00 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Abatement of legacies-executorship laws and accounts, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Abatement of legacies-executorship laws and accounts, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Abatement of legacies-executorship laws and accounts Discussions

Write discussion on Abatement of legacies-executorship laws and accounts
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Mr N. M. is lucky to have a lottery prize of Rs 20 million. He does not have any liability and does not have any claimant over this money. He has the following alternatives: (i)

Is goodwill a fictitious asset?

The Statement of Affairs The statement of affairs sets out: (a) The various assets of the debtor, at the values they are expected to realise; (b) The creditors, classified acc

1. Describe the approach Zetar Plc uses to determine goodwill impairment losses. How does this approach differ from US GAAP? 2. Zetar Plc does not report any research and develo

Suppose that the risk-free rate is 7% and that the market risk premium is 7%. What is the needed rate of return on a stock with a beta of 1.2? What is the needed rate of retu

sale of 430 to ramdas were credited in his account 340

Discuss the applicability of the operating cycle in poultry (consider broilers)

Types of temporary differences There are two main types of temporary differences; 1) Taxable temporary difference : If the carrying amount is more than the tax base then

What is the internal rate of return for a project that has a net investment of $76,000 and net cash flows of $20,507 per year for 7 years? What is the internal rate of return fo

In the NPV analysis, sunk cost is not relevant whereas opportunity cost is for project evaluation. Requirements: Describe and justify the above statement about sunk cost an