The federal government in the us constitution

Assignment Help Management Theories
Reference no: EM131378378

In an attempt to deal with the problems associated with illegal immigration, the state of Arizona passed a new statute that empowered local law enforcement officials to inspect the identification papers of anyone who might be in the country illegally. The law caused a wave of protests across the nation, mostly from people who saw the statute as racially biased. Arizona state officials argued that they had been forced to act because the federal government had done a terrible job of policing the borders and that, as a result of this neglect, there had been an unprecedented rise in violence associated with illegal border crossings.

Many American citizens supported the Arizona law and encouraged their state governments to pass similar legislation. Despite the support for the state immigration statute, the federal government sued the State of Arizona in an attempt to block the administration of the law. The Justice Department, under the control of Attorney General Eric Holder, argued that federal law trumped state law in this case because the Constitution gave the power to control immigration to the national government.

The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution does in fact state that, "(t)his Constitution and the Laws of the United States . . . shall be the supreme Law of the Land."

Thus, it would seem that the federal government had a solid argument. Still it is strange that the government avoided the discrimination claim and chose, instead, to rely on the technical argument of federal supremacy. In essence, the Justice Department chose to challenge the law based on a minor "technicality," rather than on a more substantive civil rights claim.

As you read the chapter, see if you can determine if the federal government is right in its claim. Also, see if you can offer a few counter arguments to support Arizona's position. Finally, try to determine why the Justice Department decided to fight the law based on a technicality, rather than something more substantial.

(See "Immigration: Why Did Obama Sue Arizona?" The Week, July 23, 2010, p. 6.)

Opening Case Questions

1. What powers regarding citizenship were given to the federal government in the U.S. Constitution? Explain.

2. What powers regarding citizenship were given to the state governments in the U.S. Constitution? Explain .

3. In what article and section is the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution located and why did the Framers include such a clause? Explain.

Reference no: EM131378378

Would it be ethical for the judge to place mcmahon in jail

Would it be ethical for the judge to place McMahon in jail? What is the ethical course of action for McMahon? What is the ethical course of action for Bryant? Defend all of

Was it ethical for board of dragonfly to hire an outsider

Was it ethical for the board of Dragonfly to hire an outsider as president? Is Kellor's offer to Yurchak ethical? Would the offer be ethical if Kellor had not added the requ

How utilitarian principles might deteriorate into utility

Explain how the theory of utilitarianism might help clear up the ambiguity inherent in this situation. Now explain how utilitarian principles might deteriorate into utility

Determine which of the two positions you prefer

Now use rational ethics to construct an argument that upholds the judges' original ruling. Explain each argument and determine which of the two positions you prefer. Explain

Ethical theories would support position of oklahoma voters

Which of the three major ethical theories that we have examined would support the action of the federal judge? Explain.- Which of these ethical theories would support the posi

Discuss alternatives and duties mary has as a representative

How is top management supporting a culture of ethical or unethical behavior?- Discuss the alternatives and duties Mary has as a representative for both the buyer and seller.

Are bills actions an ethical issue or a legal issue

Describe the stakeholders involved in this ethical dilemma. What stake do they have in the situation?- Are Bill's actions an ethical issue, a legal issue, or both? Explain you

Describe the stakeholders involved in this ethical dilemma

Describe the stakeholders involved in this ethical dilemma. What stake do they have in the situation?- Are Bill's actions an ethical issue, a legal issue, or both? Explain you

Reviews

Write a Review

 
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd