The case of the sole remaining supplier

Assignment Help Other Subject
Reference no: EM1378681

The heart pacemaker is a modern wonder. The device has a timer that resets itself every time the patient's heart beats. If the heart does not beat on schedule (say, within 1.2 seconds), the pacemaker gives a stimulus that causes a heartbeat.

But the technology was not always so sophisticated, and its early limitations form the background of this true story, told to Markkula Center for Applied Ethics Director Thomas Shanks, S.J., by one of the participants. Although the events happened 20 years ago, the ethical issues they raise are still relevant.

It's 1975, and you are on the board of directors of a company that makes transistors. Among the many companies with whom you have a contract is one that makes heart pacemakers.

Pacemaker technology is in its infancy. When doctors implant a pacemaker, the patient's normal heartbeat is disabled, and he or she relies entirely on the device. If it fails, the patient's heart stops. Doctors are not very adept at installing the pacemakers, which are extremely delicate; there is even a story of a person yawning deeply, pulling the pacemaker wire in his chest, and dying.

After that and many similar incidents, the board begins to reconsider whether your company should sell to the pacemaker company. Members of the board feel this situation is a major lawsuit just waiting to happen and your company, as well as the company you supply, will be liable. In addition, you feel the specs the pacemaker company uses to test the transistors are not very strong.

You and the board decide to get out of the business before it's too late. You tell the pacemaker company representatives about your conclusion, and they respond, "You can't stop selling us the transistors. You are the sole remaining supplier for us. Everyone else has backed out for the same reasons you're giving. If you don't sell us the product, we'll go out of business. Pretty soon, no one will be making heart pacemakers, and many people need them. Without the pacemaker, people don't even have a chance."

You take that information back to the board. People around the table have different opinions. One person says, "This is a bad deal, and it isn't our problem. We don't make enough on this sale to make the risk worthwhile." Another person says, "We don't know how other companies use the transistors we sell them; why should we be concerned about this one? What about that baby who died when the transistor in the incubator failed? We didn't know how that company was using the transistor." Another person says, "I think we're missing the real issue here. Don't we have an ethical obligation to sell the product to the pacemaker company? What will happen if we don't sell to them?" Another person says, "Give me a break. Our only obligation is to our shareholders. And how did we get so stupid that we're the last source? I'm telling you, we don't need this." Finally, the chair of the board says, "OK. Let's make a decision."

What do you do?

This case was written by Thomas Shanks, S.J., Executive Director of the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics.
What Really Happened? Author Thomas Shanks comments.
Fall 1996

Commentary on the Case of the Sole Remaining Supplier
by Thomas Shanks

As the story of the Sole Remaining Supplier was told to me, the Board conversation went pretty much the way the case describes it. Legal was saying, "This is a time bomb waiting to happen. Why are we even talking about this?" Engineering was bemoaning the lack of standards for testing the electronics of pacemakers, and the majority of the Board understood that they had a problem with no easy solution.

One of the people on the Board told me later that the founders of Silicon Valley were the sons (and a few daughters) of blue-collar parents. Their fathers were plumbers, electricians, and carpenters, who had passed on a core set of values to their children. This was the Valley before greed and early retirement (at the age of 30) had swept through it. So they took seriously their responsibility and duty to protect the rights of people who needed pacemakers at the same time as they balanced their fiduciary responsibility to the current company. They understood that "doing the right thing" did not have to be stupid, and that they could both do the right thing and do well for the company ("DO RIGHT" AND "DO WELL," rather than having to choose one or the other.)

So, they continued to sell to the pacemaker company. But they also instructed their engineers to develop more rigorous testing and technical standards they could hold the other company to. They reserved the right to stop selling if the other company did not improve its technical standards. They took steps to be sure they did not have a legal liability down the line and then turned it over to the other company to improve the quality of its products.

In these ways they felt they were reducing harms and maximizing utility. They felt it fair to single out the industry because it was new and standards were developing, an equal way of treating start-up industries. They felt they were showing compassion without sacrificing business, and were living out their parents' other virtues. In this way they felt that they were serving the common good, protecting people's rights to a promising new medical technology, the pacemaker.

Task: I need to explain the utilitarian ethics that apply to the following business problem (there is one attachment which describes the history of utilitarianism). In doing so, I will have to apply the Utility Test and five additional tests in a critical analysis of the organizational problem. Finally, I need to compare and contrast which of the tests I have chosen (if any) that are most responsive to the business problem.

I am not too sure how to approach this. Any help would be appreciated.

Questions:
1) Specifically, what are the utilitarian ethics issues in this Case?

2) What would Jeremy Bentham, the father of utilitarianism, have said about this Case? How might Bentham's suggestion that "We seek pleasure and the avoidance of pain..." apply here? Was Bentham right?

3) Apply Steps A through D of the Utility Test to the above case. Be sure that you carefully document each step in the process.

4) Choose one of the following five tests: Rights Test, Exceptions Test, Choices Test, Justice Test, or the Common Good Test. Click here: https://ethicsops.com/EthicsTestsLinks.aspx. Now, apply the test you've chosen to the above case.

5) Compare and contrast the results you have obtained from the Utility Test (#1 above) and your choice of the five tests (#2 above). Which of the two tests do you believe is most informative, and why?

 

Reference no: EM1378681

Questions Cloud

Understanding the facets of worldview discern : Alexander Hill and Joseph Badaracco both have written guides they hope will help practitioner act in ethical ways within practice of leadership in company.
Integration of personal worldview and business leadership : Ethics is the most critical of leadership skills. There is a straight correlation in the ethical insights and behavior of a leader and that leader's character.
Plot the swing curve for the machine : Calculate the critical clearing angle and plot the swing curve for the machine - What is the power angle at the end of the 10 cycles?
Recognize ten relevant significant peer reviewed papers : Recognize an ethical issue from a volunteering experience in a hospital and Recognize ten relevant significant peer reviewed papers
The case of the sole remaining supplier : The heart pacemaker is a modern wonder. The device has a timer that resets itself every time the patient's heart beats. If the heart does not beat on schedule, the pacemaker gives a stimulus that reasons a heartbeat.
Decorating and christmas enjoyment : Calculate the correlation between decorating and Christmas enjoyment - Maximize Wayne's studying effectiveness.
Development of morality : Take a position for or against the effectiveness and relevancy of Kohlberg's Moral Stages for working with criminals. Describe a reason so few reach Stage six.
Review the claim of consequences : Review the claim of consequentialism that actions are right to extent they have beneficial consequences. Explain a condition in which a judge might apply principle that the end justifies the means.
Practice of planting evidence or holding back evidence : Suppose you are a police officer appointed to the drug task force. Planning the principle of ethical egoism take a position for or against practice of planting evidence or holding back evidence to help ensure the conviction of a known drug trafficker..

Reviews

Write a Review

 

Other Subject Questions & Answers

  Practicing input-output psychologist

Compare and contrast the role of an I/O professor with that of a practicing I/O psychologist. What activities do they share in common? What distinguishes the two professions from each other?

  National labor relations act and board

Define "concerted action" under the NLRA. Do you think it could apply to non-union employees and non-unionized workforces?

  Society and culture in the development of eating disorders

Discuss the relevance of society and culture in the development of eating disorders. What methods might you use to assess the role of sociocultural factors in eating disorders?

  Public health and clinical medicine

The relationship between the public health and clinical medicine is a significant one, however it has often been a contentious one via the years.

  Comparison of socialism and capitalism

Explain what would be the best combined features of the economic systems of capitalism and socialism while minimizing the disadvantages of each.

  Culture play in defining intelligence

What is intelligence? What role does culture play in defining intelligence?

  Outdoor recreation

Recreation Opportunity Spectrum, contribution of outdoor recreation to the local community, nature-based recreation site, natural environment of the site,

  Legal and ethical concerns in the case

As the supervisor of this counselor trainee, what are your immediate legal and ethical concerns in this case?

  Developments in the cognitive psychology

Describe how the developments contribute to the field of psychology.

  Test of mechanical aptitude

Todd scored very high on his test of mechanical aptitude before accepting a job offer from Superior Mechanics Corp.

  Mood and perception

In addition, what would you suggest are the implications of one's mood -- either negative or positive -- on your ability to be objective and unbiased in perceiving aspects of a phenomenon?

  Basic pre-test or post-test experimental design

In your own words, briefly describe the basic pre-test/post-test experimental design, and illustrate how you could use this method to answer your hypothetical research question(s).

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd