Research and support your answer with two appellate level

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics
Reference no: EM13769703

SCENARIO:
Virginia Pollard worked as a cashier and clerk for Teddy's Supplies, a family-owned chain of film production equipment supply stores in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. During a routine performance evaluation, Virginia's supervisor at Teddy's complained that she made too many personal phone calls when she worked in the West Orange store. The supervisor noted this on Virginia's annual review, and warned her to keep personal calls to a bare minimum while at work. Soon thereafter, Teddy transferred Pollard to guard film equipment in the main warehouse behind the storefront; Virginia couldn't make personal calls there, and her work became exemplary. Her performance evaluation three months after her transfer was "meeting expectations" with no negative comments.
Virginia Pollard was the only woman working in the warehouse, and she was often the victim of pranks perpetrated by her six male colleagues. Her co-workers taped her drawers shut, locked her out of the guard shack she sat in to watch the inventory, filled the guard shack with trash, and backed a forklift up to the door and made it backfire in her ear. One day a Teddy delivery driver sat in Pollard's chair and, when she tried to push him out of it, he bent her over his lap and spanked her. Pollard's new supervisor, Steve King, rarely enforced Teddy's rules against smoking, horseplay, foul language, and sexual harassment, and often indulged in such behaviors himself. Teddy's had a written sexual harassment policy which included a method for employees to report sexual harassment - the method included filing a complaint with the direct supervisor unless the direct supervisor was the perpetrator. In that event, the employee was to file the complaint online at www.ReportTeddysafely.com. The form for reporting was a one page document. A copy of the policy which Virginia Pollard signed is located here. The policy specifically states, "In the event of a violation of this policy, employees should report the violation to their direct supervisor, unless doing so would put the employee at risk of further discrimination or harassment. In that case, the employee should report using the company website form which will submit the incident to Human Resources."
Pollard never filed a complaint with Steve King, her supervisor; she also did not file a complaint at the website, although she claimed she told King in July 2008 that she felt she was being "picked on" by the guys she worked with. She claims Steve King told her to "grow some balls" and to "get over herself." She testified during the NJ Human Rights Commission hearing that she tried to file an anonymous complaint but the website wasn't working the day she tried to do so.
In August of 2008, King and the other warehouse workers put a sign on a truck that read "HARDHAT REQUIRED/BRA OPTIONAL." King and another employee called Pollard over to look at the sign and encouraged her to do as it said. She refused and tried to walk away. King promised not to report her to management, whereupon she lifted one side of her shirt in the back and exposed part of her bra on her backside. Upper management learned of the incident that October by a co-worker who filed an anonymous complaint online. After a brief investigation, Pollard was fired for exposing her bra. None of the men were disciplined. A man replaced Pollard in the guard shack.
That November, Pollard filed a charge of sex discrimination with the New Jersey Commission on Human Rights. The Commission found that Pollard had been the victim of sex discrimination and that Teddy's reasons for firing her were pretext, and awarded her back wages and damages. Teddy's appealed to the circuit court, including in their case that Pollard had committed several infractions, including participating in the spanking incident. They reported that Pollard had failed to report any sexual harassment and included a copy of their sexual harassment policy as part of their defense case. The Circuit Court found that Teddy did have good reason to discipline Pollard but that firing her was in fact disparate treatment when compared with the utter lack of discipline given to King. The circuit court reversed the Commission's award of damages because it believed that Teddy had been right to discipline Pollard, but they ordered Teddy's to reinstate Pollard to her old position. Pollard appealed to the New Jersey Court of Appeals and refused to accept her job back.

ROLE: 
You are an independent Human Resources Consultant that was hired by Teddy's Supplies to consult on this case during the appeal.

PLAYERS:
1. Francena Phillips: Cashier
2. Ted Moore: CEO and founder
3. Ms. Wilson: Systems Inc. President


Q1. Write a memo to the Teddy's Supplies CEO advising him of the following:

a. The case facts
b. The decisions/proceedings to date
c. The company's potential for liability, and under what laws.
d. The worst-case damages that could be imposed. 
Q2. How does Title VII apply to this fact scenario? 
Q3. Research and support your answer with two appellate level (including Supreme Court) U.S. cases that discuss sexual harassment and Title VII, and pertain to this case. Provide the case names, citations, facts, and decisions of those cases. 
Q4. Review Teddy's sexual harassment policy that Virginia Pollard signed. Virginia tried to make an anonymous complaint, but the website was down that day. During the Human Rights Commission case, a review of the website statistics showed that Virginia accessed the website for downloading dental coverage forms at least three times during the time-frame of the alleged discrimination, but did not try to access the complaint area. The commission determined that Teddy's ability to track employees' website use violated privacy rights, and refused to consider this information. Provide three recommendations to the CEO for a way to ensure that future employees cannot claim "technical issues" for not filing a complaint. Explain, in your recommendations, the legal consequences to an employee if they do not utilize the complaint mechanism of the sexual harassment policy. Support these recommendations with current case law.
Q5. Would Pollard's case be affected if her replacement was female? If so, how? If not, why not? Explain. (10 points) 

Reference no: EM13769703

Questions Cloud

Mcphearson v. buick motors : Prior to the 1935 Case of "McPhearson v. Buick Motors", manufacturers had little or no liability exposure for malfunctions of their products that lead to injuries or death to individuals from said product failure. What was the specific problem associ..
Contributing factors that caused the disaster : Identify the contributing factors that caused the disaster. Why is this disaster a focusing event?
Why is the role of the systems analyst : Why is the role of the systems analyst so critical in a systems development project? Explain what skills and knowledge are required to be effective.
Assignment on imc and satisfaction : 1. Discuss the company's advertising strategy and how it aligns with its marketing goals. 2. Determine how the effectiveness of the advertising will be measured.
Research and support your answer with two appellate level : Research and support your answer with two appellate level (including Supreme Court) U.S. cases that discuss sexual harassment and Title VII, and pertain to this case. Provide the case names, citations, facts, and decisions of those cases.
Define and describe the category of crime : Define and describe the category of crime, its characteristics, typical offenders, and the theoretical perspectives attributed to it. Identify and describe your chosen individual or group that perpetrated this type of crime
Explain the differences in agile and waterfall methodologies : Explain the main differences between the agile and waterfall methodologies.
Real-world example for perfect competition : A large city, a good, real-world example for perfect competition - firm under monopolistic competition - Real-world example for perfect competition.
Explains the benefits to the company : Write a 1,050- to 1,200-word paper that explains the benefits to the company. Include the following:

Reviews

Write a Review

 

Business Law and Ethics Questions & Answers

  What is beautifulis beauty truly in the eye of the beholder

there are certain big questions that philosophers have been puzzling over for millennia. amazingly many people ask

  The greatest risks in the u.s with a minimum

The Greatest Risks in the U.S with a minimum of 2250 words in APA format with properly cited sources.

  Which has its principal place of business in malaysia

Rahim Trading, which has its principal place of business in Malaysia, agreed to buy, from Acme, which has its principal place of business in Australia, 500 metric tonnes of Grade 1 Jasmine rice CIF (Singapore) Incoterms 2010, payment to be made..

  Explain what is private nuisance and public nuisance

Explain what is private nuisance and public nuisance and give examples of each type of nuisance and what loss may Rihannanre cover from Tuff developers and why.

  Legal issue briefs and presentations

Legal Issue Briefs and Presentations: Each student will select a legal topic of interest to the student and produce a paper reviewing the issue

  Essay on why mock trials are important

Write 500-700 wird essay on why mock trials are important and what the benefits are of having mock trials. It's due at 11 am New York time

  Case studyfind and read the judgment in p j mccarthy amp

case studyfind and read the judgment in p j mccarthy amp sons pty ltd v q paint pty ltd 2013 qsc 39 and answer the

  Ethical issues relating to marketing and advertising

Research three to five (3-5) ethical issues relating to marketing and advertising, intellectual property, and regulation of product safety and examine whether PharmaCARE violated any of the issues in question

  Compare and contrast gangs and non-traditional gangs

Compare and contrast gangs and non-traditional gangs

  Anticipatory repudiation may be used when a party has

1. tf restitution is classified as an equitable remedy2. tf when an assignment is made the assignee has the right

  The article in which you analyze the requirements for

write a 350- to 1050-word summary of the article in which you analyze the requirements for search and arrest warrants

  You have been advised by thenbspwarden that thenbspagency

you have been advised by thenbspwarden that thenbspagency is going to seek nationalnbspaccreditation by the

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd