Reference no: EM131230940

Read the following and answer the questions below

Real-Life Ethical Dilemma Exercise

In December 2011, Sarah Fielder’s company was preparing to lay off some of its employees. Sarah, who was 7 months pregnant at the time, wasn’t worried because her friends told her they wouldn’t layoff a pregnant employee because it was against the law. Sarah received her layoff notice 5 days later. Sara’s stunned response was “It was awful—I was planning to work until I went into labor, and to return after taking my allotted maternity leave…Instead of being given an office baby shower, I was given a pink slip.” The company stated that the layoff was not related to Fielder’s pregnancy because that would be against the law. It is a violation of the Civil Rights Act to fire an employee specifically because she is pregnant, which is why firms never mention pregnancy in the firing of an employee. Furthermore, it is also lawful to lay off an employee on maternity leave if the pregnancy was not included in the decision. Some experts claim that the downturn in the economy gives a ready excuse for a company just to lay off one employee, which could be a pregnant employee that they no longer want on the payroll. Of course, a company would have the “bonus” of not having an obligation to pay for maternity leave if the pregnant employee was fired. To compound the problem, if the pregnant woman works for a small company with fewer than 20 employees, she may not be able to obtain affordable health coverage to pay for the delivery. In 2011, 6,285 cases of pregnancy-based discrimination charges were filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Furthermore, in 2008, a federal judge in Brooklyn, New York, ruled that an employer does not have to make special accommodation for pregnant women. For example, an employer does not have to allow a pregnant employee to take more bathroom breaks nor does the employer have to suspend the job duties that require heavy lifting if the employee is pregnant. The reasons these accommodations are not required is that pregnancy is not considered a disability so the employers do not have to provide the same reasonable accommodations that are required under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

QUESTIONS*

1. Do you think employers need to give pregnant women special accommodations?

2. How often do you think pregnancy is part of the decision process when layoffs occur within a firm?

3. Do you think there are certain industries that would be more likely to fire pregnant women? Do you think there are certain industries that would be less likely to fire pregnant women?