Power to place lien

Assignment Help Other Subject
Reference no: EM1329360

In 1979, Paul and John Reardon purchased 16 acres of land located next to a manufacturing plant in Massachusetts. In 1983, a state environmental agency, responding to a citizen's report, tested soil samples from both properties and discovered extremely high levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) on the plant site and on the Reardons' property where it bordered the site. Shortly thereafter, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) cleaned up the contaminated areas. In 1985, the EPA notified the Reardons that they might be liable for clean-up costs. An EPA investigation of the property in 1987 revealed that some soil was still contaminated. This time, the Reardons cleaned up the property themselves.

In March 1989, the EPA placed a lien for an unspecified amount on all of the Reardons' property to secure payment for any clean-up costs for which the Reardons might be liable. The EPA told the Reardons that they could settle the claims against them for $336,709 but noted that this amount did not limit the Reardonâ??s potential liability.

The Reardons filed a motion for an injunction, arguing that filing a lien against their property without any prior notice or hearing violated their due process rights under the Fifth Amendment, which states that no person can be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

Superfund (the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, or CERCLA, of 1980, as amended in 1986) gives the government several powerful tools to use when attempting to collect clean-up costs from responsible parties. Among those tools is the authority to place a lien on a responsible party's property without providing for a reasonable hearing before placing the lien.

Is the power to place a lien on a piece of property without prior opportunity to be heard in a court of law or administrative hearing constitutional? Why or why not?

did the EPA really violate the Reardon's due process rights? The Fifth Amendment states that no person can be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. It does not say WHEN that due process needs to occur. If the EPA gives the Reardon's the right to be heard after the lien has been placed on the property (and presumably compensates them for any provable losses associated with that "taking" if it turns out to be wrongful), haven't constitutional requirements been met? Can you think of a reason why the EPA might need to act first and satisfy Due Process later?

Please help me analysis the case by answering the questions above.

 

Reference no: EM1329360

What effect do dams have on supply of healthy fresh water

What are the causes of the water crisis world wide according to the movie "Blue Gold" and the assigned articles? What do you think are tenable public policies to correct th

Identify and discuss the different types of training modes

Identify and discuss the different types of training modes. Are employees receptive to the training? How does the organization encourage active participation in the training

Write an overview of the organization you selected

Select a business organization from the Fortune 500 which is of interest to you and ensure that you will be able to obtain the necessary information about its strategy, busi

What manner does vanessa depression manifest itself

Why do teenagers require treatment that is tailored to their developmental needs? Given Vanessa's background and presenting symptoms, develop an intervention that you would us

Describe an artwork that expresses

Consider the artworks you have looked at throughout the course. Describe an artwork that expresses your personal experience as a man or woman. What roles have you played in yo

How a school could contribute to closing the achievement

how a school could contribute to closing the achievement gap for students in the specific demographic group. Also make recommendations as to how communities can contribute t

How judges are nominated for service in your nation

If you are an international student, explain how judges are nominated, reviewed, and approved for service in your nation or country and how this has impacted public policy.

Discuss your choice of two reasons excuses

Discuss your choice of two reasons (excuses?) mentioned within "Not Doing It By the Book" that we neglect to read -- or downright ignore -- manuals, instructions, quick guid

Reviews

Write a Review

 
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd