In watson v. fort worth bank

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM13525663

In Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust, the Supreme Court held that:

1 Disparate impact analysis may be applied to a subjective or discretionary promotion system

2 That there was no basis for a finding of discrimination

3 That the bank had in fact acted appropriately in denying the promotion

4 The government has no interest in the promotions of employees of private corporations

Reference no: EM13525663

Questions Cloud

Example of the trap-a small personal matter : Martha Stewart was reported as having said that her sale of ImClone stock was “a small personal matter.” This is an example of the trap of:

Which best justifies the foreign corrupt practices act : Which best justifies the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act?

Components of a good whistle : Components of a good whistle? blower program/policy are

Corporate social responsibility include : The criticisms of Milton Friedman’s views on “corporate social responsibility” include:

In watson v. fort worth bank : In Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust, the Supreme Court held that:

Seek to do significant business is : Consider carefully: Giving a gift with a value of $5,000 to an executive of a foreign corporation with which you seek to do significant business is:

In determining whether there has been negligence : In determining whether there has been negligence, which of the following factors are relevant:

Under the economic espionage act of 2000 : The first civil case brought under The Economic Espionage Act of 2000, per the applicable lecture, involved:

Appropriately paired : The following terms are appropriately paired:

User Account

All Pages