Reference no: EM131252627
Learning Activities #1
Making the Case
One of your readings for the week, "27 Psychological Reasons Good People Do Bad Things", looks at a number of examples where arguably good people are faced with challenging ethical situations and take perhaps a less than ethical stance in reaction thereto. For this activity you are to select 3 of the examples and discuss whether you agree or disagree with the outcome or conclusion. In your discussion I want you to make the most compelling arguments you can to convince and persuade me that your point of view is the correct one. Is there anything in your value system that leads you to your point of view?
Required reference:
https://www.businessinsider.com/27-psychological-reasons-why-good-people-do-bad-things-2012-8#tunnel-vision-1
Learning Activities #2
Whistle-blowing: Harder Than It Looks?
R.U. Kidding, the comptroller for Rocket Man Enterprises, a government defense contractor, has a delicate ethical issue on his hands. In the course of his employment, Kidding has uncovered evidence that seems to indicate that Rocket Man has been overbilling the government for a weapons system project. Under its contract with the government, Rocket Man was supposed to calculate its hourly rate with a formula dividing charges between the more expensive work done directly in their offices and the less costly hourly labor performed by subcontractors. What Rocket Man did was simple: they billed subcontractor work at the higher in-house rate.
R.U. Kidding, realizing that the weapons system project is the lifeblood of Rocket Man, is at a loss as to what he should do with the information he has uncovered. On the one hand he feels he has a duty to bring this wrongdoing to light. After all, he reasons, there is the greater public interest and common good to consider. On the other hand, the project is so critical to the financial future of the Company that the disclosure of wrongdoing could be devastating for the Company and its employees, many of whom are R.U.'s colleagues and friends. If you were in R.U.'s shoes, what would you do and why?
Required references:
1. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/21/your-money/deciding-when-to-blow-the-whistle-and-when-to-walk-away.html?pagewanted=all
2. https://fmlink.com/articles/the-importance-of-ethics-in-the-workplace/
Write down the iteration matrix corresponding to sor
: What is a necessary and sufficient condition for convergence of a stationary scheme for any initial guess?
|
What are the nash equilibria of each stage game
: What are the Nash equilibria of each stage-game? - How many pure strategies does each player have in the multistage game?
|
For what type of matrices is the cg method suitable
: How are search direction and step size (or step length) related to the methods of Section 7.4?
|
Analyze thoreau views on labor
: For this assignment, you will write a 750 word, analytical essay. In a well-developed, organized, and thesis-driven analysis, please respond to one of the following prompts: Analyze Thoreau's views on labor and connect it to a theme from the book
|
If you were in rus shoes what would you do and why
: R.U. Kidding, realizing that the weapons system project is the lifeblood of Rocket Man, is at a loss as to what he should do with the information he has uncovered. If you were in R.U.'s shoes, what would you do and why?
|
Does diversity in the workplace really make a difference
: Does Diversity in the workplace Really Make a Difference?
|
How much house can you afford
: Create a table that shows the following information for at least 3 credit cards: grace period, interest rate, annual fee, over-the-limit fee, late fee, cash advance interest rate/fees, and transfer interest rate. In a one page paper discuss your n..
|
Find the spectral radius of the jacobi and gauss-seidel
: Find the optimal SOR parameter, ω∗. What is the spectral radius of the corresponding iteration matrix? Approximately how much faster would SOR with ω∗ converge compared to Jacobi?
|
What we still need to know is through reflective writing
: One of the most effective ways we can understand what it is we know, what we have learned, and what we still need to know is through reflective writing. While reflective writing is not, by definition, technical writing, this weekly exercise should..
|