Reference no: EM131379148
On April 11, Fred Chapman discharged Anna Savant, the manager of his store, the Super Electronic Supply Outlet.
On April 12, Chapman called The Barnard Crossings Chronicle and had a notice printed to the effect that Savant no longer worked for Super. On that same day, Savant ordered 12 electronic games, 2 computers, 2 laser printers, a fax machine, and a car stereo from the Global Electronic Components Corporation.
As she had frequently done in the past while acting as manager for Super, she told George Pierce, the owner of Global, to send the bill to Super. Pierce did so. Savant then kept these items for herself. Pierce did not have actual notice of Savant's discharge until April 28, when he saw the notice as he was throwing out some old newspapers.
Savant could not be located, so Pierce brought suit against Chapman and Super. Chapman argued that the newspaper notice was sufficient to warn Pierce not to deal with Savant. How would the court rule? Explain.
|
How did the court find in the dispute
: LePage disputed this claim, arguing that the facts did not warrant a finding of agency under any theory. How did the court find in this dispute? Why?
|
|
Firms in monopolistic competition can acquire market power
: Firms in monopolistic competition can acquire some market power by: Which school of thought calls for more information from government policymakers so that consumers can make more rational economic decisions?
|
|
Perform the common sizing technique
: Perform the common sizing technique (convert the dollars to percentages). Perform a trend analysis for years 1-3. This information will be used to provide a response to the Discussion Board.
|
|
Make a scatterplot and describe the association
: Why would you not want to talk about the correlation between a planet's Position and Distance from the sun?
|
|
How would the court rule
: Savant could not be located, so Pierce brought suit against Chapman and Super. Chapman argued that the newspaper notice was sufficient to warn Pierce not to deal with Savant. How would the court rule? Explain.
|
|
Were turners actions outside the scope of his employment
: The state concluded, the court should dismiss Elliot's claim against it. Were Turner's actions outside the scope of his employment as a prison guard? Explain.
|
|
Find the correlation of flights with year
: Note two reasons that the correlation you found in part a is not a suitable summary of the strength of the association. Can you account for these violations of the conditions?
|
|
The decision was for whom and why
: There was no evidence, however, that Carfiro was hired, paid, instructed by, or even known by Chicken Delight. The decision was for whom, and why?
|
|
Describe the value proposition
: Describe the value proposition behind General Electrics Industrial Internet initiative (e.g. what job does GE’s strategic initiative aim to fulfill for its consumers?).
|