Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
In 1991, EnerSys entered into an agreement with Exide Technologies to purchase substantially all of Exide's battery business for about $135 million. To formalize this sale, the parties entered into more than 23 agreements. Under the collection of agreements, Exide agreed to allow EnerSys to use the Exide trademark without royalties in the industrial battery business, while Exide retained the right to use the Exide trademark outside the industrial battery business. In 2000, Exide wished to reenter the North American industrial battery business. Both parties agreed to the termination of the 10-year noncompetition agreement, but Exide was unable to regain the Exide trademark from EnerSys. In 2002, when Exide filed for bankruptcy protection, Exide attempted to reject various agreements it had made with EnerSys in 1991, including the right to use Exide's trademark. The bankruptcy court granted an order finding that the agreement was an executory contract, a contract that was so underperformed that failure of either party to complete performance would result in a material breach excusing performance of the other. The Bankruptcy Code allows debtors to reject any executor contract.
EnerSys appealed the bankruptcy court's decision, arguing that it had substantially performed its obligations under the 1991 agreement, including paying the full $135 million and operating the industrial battery business the 11 years prior to the 2002 bankruptcy ruling. The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court's holding that EnerSys's obligation for trademark use and quality standards provision amounted to elements of the agreement that would cause a material breach if they were not observed. EnerSys again appealed, arguing that any obligations EnerSys had under the 1991 agreement were not material. How do you think the court of appeals ruled? What standard would you use to determine whether an element of the agreement between the two parties was material?
Why is the insanity defense so difficult to prove? What factors must be proven for a person to be deemed legally insane
Then identify the three most consequential threats that you expect to encounter that week. Understanding that risk is a function of likelihood and consequence (Risk = Likelihood X Consequence), how do you rank order the overall risk posed by these..
Discuss an ethical or regulatory issue that plays a role in successful eCommerce? Support your view with evidence, explanations and credible references.
The Fund provides advocacy and support services to victims of crime for the purpose of developing and enhancing existing programs that serve victims of crime.
employment lawif you had a choice would you rather work in a right to work state non unionan or a heavily unionized
in a 1-2 page paper discuss five of the ten following laws. explain why they were enacted. give a short summary of each
individual assignment personal perception of organized crime papero write a 700- to 1050-word paper describing your
respond to the following questions.1. explain edwin sutherlands differential association theory. what is its major
Do you think that acting ethically is just a matter of wanting to badly enough and what kinds of situational factors can you think of that might make it difficult for a well-intentioned person to always do the right thing?
Essay must address the effects of the Supreme Court's decisions on law enforcement in the United States. Discuss the Supreme Court's current approach to balancing civil liberties against public order maintenance
You are required to support your answer by reference to relevant legal authority
Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on whether each of the subjects affect business in the United States and if so, provide the worst and best case scenarios.
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd