Examine your states policy on employment-at-will
Course:- Business Law and Ethics
Length: 1200 words
Reference No.:- EM13764448

Assignment Help
Expertsmind Rated 4.9 / 5 based on 47215 reviews.
Review Site
Assignment Help >> Business Law and Ethics

Assignment: Employment-At-Will Doctrine

Imagine you are a recently-hired Chief Operating Officer (COO) in a midsize company preparing for an Initial Public Offering (IPO). You quickly discover multiple personnel problems that require your immediate attention.

John posted a rant on his Facebook page in which he criticized the company's most important customer.

Ellen started a blog to protest the CEO's bonus, noting that no one below director has gotten a raise in two (2) years and portraying her bosses as "know-nothings" and "out-of-touch"

Bill has been using his company-issued BlackBerry to run his own business on the side.

After being disciplined for criticizing a customer in an email (sent from his personal email account on a company computer), Joe threatens to sue the company for invasion of privacy.

One of the department supervisors requests your approval to fire his secretary for insubordination. Since the secretary has always received glowing reviews, you call her into your office and determine that she has refused to prepare false expense reports for her boss.

Anna's boss refused to sign her leave request for jury duty and now wants to fire her for being absent without permission.
As an astute manager, you will need to analyze the employment-at-will doctrine and determine what, if any, exceptions and liabilities exist before taking any action. As you proceed with your investigation, you discover the company has no whistleblower policy.

In preparation for this assignment, use the Internet to research your state's employment-at-will policy.

Write a four to five (5) page paper in which you:

Summarize the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text and then evaluate three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining:

Whether you can legally fire the employee; include an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine.

The primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; specify the ethical theory that best supports your decision.

Examine your state's policy on employment-at-will. Analyze at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state's employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Include a summary of the main issue and the outcome in the identified real-world example.

Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference and proprietary Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Put your comment

Ask Question & Get Answers from Experts
Browse some more (Business Law and Ethics) Materials
Briefly discuss the meaning of the so-called social contract. In doing so, speak about political philosophers such as John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Jean-Jacques Roussea
Suppose Spires was sent by Johnson Welded Products to do a welding job in Montana. Spires was provided a Johnson Welded Products truck and stayed at a motel rented by Johnso
Briefly define consideration and explain why it is important. Briefly identify and describe 2 advantages and 2 disadvantages of public corporations versus private closely held
Explain the role of gender conversational rituals. Elaborate on the topic and share several ways you, or someone you know, has had to adapt to gender differences in communic
Discuss how internal or external stakeholders have influenced the situation in a positive or negative way? How will you consider stakeholders in your solution to the problem?
Don't just talk about his new hard work ethic or his now honorable character. Be specific. You are to write your proposal as if you are pitching it directly to Michael Vick
The Federal rule of Evidence (FRE), in defining hearsay, use an " assertion-based"test. In some states where the FRE assertion-based test is not applied, a "declarant-based"
Why does the court talk about its "sense of the current state of tort law in Massachusetts" and how this case "would be treated by the Massachusetts courts," as if it were n