+1-415-670-9189
info@expertsmind.com
Examine the multiple points-of-view and weigh the evidence
Course:- Other Subject
Reference No.:- EM131164090




Assignment Help
Expertsmind Rated 4.9 / 5 based on 47215 reviews.
Review Site
Assignment Help >> Other Subject

Assignment : Socratic Dialogue

For this assignment you will create a Socratic dialogue. The dialogue will be completed in two parts. The first part will be 1-2 pages of notes to help you generate the arguments and analysis that will become a part of your dialogue in Part II.

Part I

1. Identify a belief. This can be a religious belief, an ethical belief, political belief, or any other one about which reasonable minds can disagree. Beliefs that are held by the vast majority of people (such as a widely accepted scientific fact) are not good choices for this assignment). A good topic will have reasonable evidence and reasoning supporting both sides.

2. Consider other points of view, or counter-arguments. Think about what you find persuasive about these counter-arguments, as well as how you might argue against them. Try to keep an open mind. Remember, we are engaging in philosophical dialogue, not trying to win an argument.

3. Examine the multiple points-of-view and weigh the evidence. Identify any unsupported assumptions or holes in the argument.

4. Consider the consequences of the beliefs presented. Philosophical thinking is an ongoing process, so it is important to identify questions for further thinking and to wonder about factors and circumstances that might change your view about a particular question.

Part II

Using the analysis from Part I, write a 2-page dialogue between Socrates and a person of your choosing (i.e., the Interlocutor) that examines the belief.

1. Have the Interlocutor present the belief and reasons you identified in step 1 of Part I.

2. Have Socrates pose questions that encourage the Interlocutor to consider other points-of-view as well as any problems with their argument, drawing upon the multiple points-of-view you identified in steps 2 and 3 of Part I, as well as the potential consequences of a given position as identified in step 4 of Part I.

3. Make sure your dialogue arrives at a conclusion. Keep in mind that it may be different from the belief or point of view you started with, and could be somewhat open-ended. As you searched for reasons that support your belief or point of view, you may have also come across reasons that challenge your beliefs. Don't hide from these challenges. Remember, philosophy requires us to examine and even question our beliefs. If you find yourself more persuaded by the other points of view, don't despair! Unlike a formal debate, the kinds of arguments we make while engaging in philosophical thinking are open to revision.




Put your comment
 
Minimize


Ask Question & Get Answers from Experts
Browse some more (Other Subject) Materials
Psychological Egoism, After reviewing Chapter 1 in your textbook and watching "Virtue Ethics," find a contemporary article showing how the theory of psychological egoism in
You have been asked tomake a presentation regarding digital citizenship to the teachers at your school, the parents, school administration as well as the school board, what
Assignment: Discussion-Emotional Disorders. Psychological disorders of childhood and adolescence are organized into various categories. One of these categories is emotional d
Read in 20 numbers, each of which is between 10 and 100. As each number is read, print it only if it is not a duplicate of a number that has already been read. Provide for t
How does the discipline of political science differ from the practice of politics? What are the sub-disciplines of political science? What is your own personal understanding o
Measure the impact of the federalization of airport screening. Select a viewpoint pro or con to the aforementioned federalization and utilize security management fundamental
Incorporate the following into your expanded website:Apply Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) to format elements.Integrate multimedia into the website.Create navigation for the site
Explain the Cartesian proof for the existence of god. Does his version of god resemble any of the concepts of the divine proposed by the major world religions? Can his account